Cargando…
Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00680-5 |
| _version_ | 1785074664336261120 |
|---|---|
| author | Terayama, Takero Okano, Hiromu Kawakami, Sadatoshi Kano, Kenichi Sakuraya, Masaaki Aoki, Yoshitaka |
| author_facet | Terayama, Takero Okano, Hiromu Kawakami, Sadatoshi Kano, Kenichi Sakuraya, Masaaki Aoki, Yoshitaka |
| author_sort | Terayama, Takero |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-10353182 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-103531822023-07-19 Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 Terayama, Takero Okano, Hiromu Kawakami, Sadatoshi Kano, Kenichi Sakuraya, Masaaki Aoki, Yoshitaka J Intensive Care Letter to the Editor BioMed Central 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10353182/ /pubmed/37461098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00680-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| spellingShingle | Letter to the Editor Terayama, Takero Okano, Hiromu Kawakami, Sadatoshi Kano, Kenichi Sakuraya, Masaaki Aoki, Yoshitaka Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 |
| title | Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 |
| title_full | Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 |
| title_short | Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 |
| title_sort | comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional grade method using the data of japanese clinical practice guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2020 |
| topic | Letter to the Editor |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37461098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00680-5 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT terayamatakero comparisonofcertaintyofevidencebetweenthenetbenefitapproachandthetraditionalgrademethodusingthedataofjapaneseclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagementofsepsisandsepticshock2020 AT okanohiromu comparisonofcertaintyofevidencebetweenthenetbenefitapproachandthetraditionalgrademethodusingthedataofjapaneseclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagementofsepsisandsepticshock2020 AT kawakamisadatoshi comparisonofcertaintyofevidencebetweenthenetbenefitapproachandthetraditionalgrademethodusingthedataofjapaneseclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagementofsepsisandsepticshock2020 AT kanokenichi comparisonofcertaintyofevidencebetweenthenetbenefitapproachandthetraditionalgrademethodusingthedataofjapaneseclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagementofsepsisandsepticshock2020 AT sakurayamasaaki comparisonofcertaintyofevidencebetweenthenetbenefitapproachandthetraditionalgrademethodusingthedataofjapaneseclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagementofsepsisandsepticshock2020 AT aokiyoshitaka comparisonofcertaintyofevidencebetweenthenetbenefitapproachandthetraditionalgrademethodusingthedataofjapaneseclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagementofsepsisandsepticshock2020 AT comparisonofcertaintyofevidencebetweenthenetbenefitapproachandthetraditionalgrademethodusingthedataofjapaneseclinicalpracticeguidelinesformanagementofsepsisandsepticshock2020 |