Cargando…
Diffusion tensor imaging in the courtroom: Distinction between scientific specificity and legally admissible evidence
Interest and uptake of science and medicine peer-reviewed literature by readers outside of a paper’s topical subject, field or even discipline is ever-expanding. While the application of knowledge from one field or discipline to others can stimulate innovative solutions to problems facing modern soc...
Autores principales: | van Velkinburgh, Jennifer Christine, Herbst, Mark D, Casper, Stewart M |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469746 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4477 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A scientist’s take on scientific evidence in the courtroom
por: Albright, Thomas D.
Publicado: (2023) -
Coercive Control in the Courtroom: the Legal Abuse Scale (LAS)
por: Gutowski, Ellen R., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Digital forensics for legal professionals: understanding digital evidence from the warrant to the courtroom
por: Daniel, Larry, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Scientists in the courtroom: basic pointers for the expert scientific witness.
por: Eaton, D L, et al.
Publicado: (1994) -
Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom: a review
por: Aono, Darby, et al.
Publicado: (2019)