Cargando…

Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a life-threatening condition with high mortality rates. AIM: To compare the performance of pre-endoscopic risk scores in predicting the following primary outcomes: In-hospital mortality, intervention (endoscopic or surgical) and length of admission...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morarasu, Bianca Codrina, Sorodoc, Victorita, Haisan, Anca, Morarasu, Stefan, Bologa, Cristina, Haliga, Raluca Ecaterina, Lionte, Catalina, Marciuc, Emilia Adriana, Elsiddig, Mohammed, Cimpoesu, Diana, Dimofte, Gabriel Mihail, Sorodoc, Laurentiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469720
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4513
_version_ 1785074725828952064
author Morarasu, Bianca Codrina
Sorodoc, Victorita
Haisan, Anca
Morarasu, Stefan
Bologa, Cristina
Haliga, Raluca Ecaterina
Lionte, Catalina
Marciuc, Emilia Adriana
Elsiddig, Mohammed
Cimpoesu, Diana
Dimofte, Gabriel Mihail
Sorodoc, Laurentiu
author_facet Morarasu, Bianca Codrina
Sorodoc, Victorita
Haisan, Anca
Morarasu, Stefan
Bologa, Cristina
Haliga, Raluca Ecaterina
Lionte, Catalina
Marciuc, Emilia Adriana
Elsiddig, Mohammed
Cimpoesu, Diana
Dimofte, Gabriel Mihail
Sorodoc, Laurentiu
author_sort Morarasu, Bianca Codrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a life-threatening condition with high mortality rates. AIM: To compare the performance of pre-endoscopic risk scores in predicting the following primary outcomes: In-hospital mortality, intervention (endoscopic or surgical) and length of admission (≥ 7 d). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 363 patients presenting with upper GI bleeding from December 2020 to January 2021. We calculated and compared the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) of Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PERS), albumin, international normalized ratio, altered mental status, systolic blood pressure, age older than 65 (AIMS65) and age, blood tests and comorbidities (ABC), including their optimal cut-off in variceal and non-variceal upper GI bleeding cohorts. We subsequently analyzed through a logistic binary regression model, if addition of lactate increased the score performance. RESULTS: All scores had discriminative ability in predicting in-hospital mortality irrespective of study group. AIMS65 score had the best performance in the variceal bleeding group (AUROC = 0.772; P < 0.001), and ABC score (AUROC = 0.775; P < 0.001) in the non-variceal bleeding group. However, ABC score, at a cut-off value of 5.5, was the best predictor (AUROC = 0.770, P = 0.001) of in-hospital mortality in both populations. PERS score was a good predictor for endoscopic treatment (AUC = 0.604; P = 0.046) in the variceal population, while GBS score, (AUROC = 0.722; P = 0.024), outperformed the other scores in predicting surgical intervention. Addition of lactate to AIMS65 score, increases by 5-fold the probability of in-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) and by 12-fold if added to GBS score (P < 0.003). No score proved to be a good predictor for length of admission. CONCLUSION: ABC score is the most accurate in predicting in-hospital mortality in both mixed and non-variceal bleeding population. PERS and GBS should be used to determine need for endoscopic and surgical intervention, respectively. Lactate can be used as an additional tool to risk scores for predicting in-hospital mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10353516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103535162023-07-19 Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding Morarasu, Bianca Codrina Sorodoc, Victorita Haisan, Anca Morarasu, Stefan Bologa, Cristina Haliga, Raluca Ecaterina Lionte, Catalina Marciuc, Emilia Adriana Elsiddig, Mohammed Cimpoesu, Diana Dimofte, Gabriel Mihail Sorodoc, Laurentiu World J Clin Cases Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a life-threatening condition with high mortality rates. AIM: To compare the performance of pre-endoscopic risk scores in predicting the following primary outcomes: In-hospital mortality, intervention (endoscopic or surgical) and length of admission (≥ 7 d). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 363 patients presenting with upper GI bleeding from December 2020 to January 2021. We calculated and compared the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) of Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PERS), albumin, international normalized ratio, altered mental status, systolic blood pressure, age older than 65 (AIMS65) and age, blood tests and comorbidities (ABC), including their optimal cut-off in variceal and non-variceal upper GI bleeding cohorts. We subsequently analyzed through a logistic binary regression model, if addition of lactate increased the score performance. RESULTS: All scores had discriminative ability in predicting in-hospital mortality irrespective of study group. AIMS65 score had the best performance in the variceal bleeding group (AUROC = 0.772; P < 0.001), and ABC score (AUROC = 0.775; P < 0.001) in the non-variceal bleeding group. However, ABC score, at a cut-off value of 5.5, was the best predictor (AUROC = 0.770, P = 0.001) of in-hospital mortality in both populations. PERS score was a good predictor for endoscopic treatment (AUC = 0.604; P = 0.046) in the variceal population, while GBS score, (AUROC = 0.722; P = 0.024), outperformed the other scores in predicting surgical intervention. Addition of lactate to AIMS65 score, increases by 5-fold the probability of in-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) and by 12-fold if added to GBS score (P < 0.003). No score proved to be a good predictor for length of admission. CONCLUSION: ABC score is the most accurate in predicting in-hospital mortality in both mixed and non-variceal bleeding population. PERS and GBS should be used to determine need for endoscopic and surgical intervention, respectively. Lactate can be used as an additional tool to risk scores for predicting in-hospital mortality. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-07-06 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10353516/ /pubmed/37469720 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4513 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Morarasu, Bianca Codrina
Sorodoc, Victorita
Haisan, Anca
Morarasu, Stefan
Bologa, Cristina
Haliga, Raluca Ecaterina
Lionte, Catalina
Marciuc, Emilia Adriana
Elsiddig, Mohammed
Cimpoesu, Diana
Dimofte, Gabriel Mihail
Sorodoc, Laurentiu
Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_fullStr Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_short Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_sort age, blood tests and comorbidities and aims65 risk scores outperform glasgow-blatchford and pre-endoscopic rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469720
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4513
work_keys_str_mv AT morarasubiancacodrina agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT sorodocvictorita agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT haisananca agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT morarasustefan agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT bologacristina agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT haligaralucaecaterina agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT liontecatalina agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT marciucemiliaadriana agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT elsiddigmohammed agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT cimpoesudiana agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT dimoftegabrielmihail agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT sorodoclaurentiu agebloodtestsandcomorbiditiesandaims65riskscoresoutperformglasgowblatchfordandpreendoscopicrockallscoreinpatientswithuppergastrointestinalbleeding