Cargando…

Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is emerging as a transformative technology for biomedical engineering. The 3D printed product can be patient-specific by allowing customizability and direct control of the architecture. The trial-and-error approach currently used for developing the composition of prin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Hongyi, Liu, Yuanchang, Balabani, Stavroula, Hirayama, Ryuji, Huang, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AAAS 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469394
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/research.0197
_version_ 1785074732268257280
author Chen, Hongyi
Liu, Yuanchang
Balabani, Stavroula
Hirayama, Ryuji
Huang, Jie
author_facet Chen, Hongyi
Liu, Yuanchang
Balabani, Stavroula
Hirayama, Ryuji
Huang, Jie
author_sort Chen, Hongyi
collection PubMed
description Three-dimensional (3D) printing is emerging as a transformative technology for biomedical engineering. The 3D printed product can be patient-specific by allowing customizability and direct control of the architecture. The trial-and-error approach currently used for developing the composition of printable inks is time- and resource-consuming due to the increasing number of variables requiring expert knowledge. Artificial intelligence has the potential to reshape the ink development process by forming a predictive model for printability from experimental data. In this paper, we constructed machine learning (ML) algorithms including decision tree, random forest (RF), and deep learning (DL) to predict the printability of biomaterials. A total of 210 formulations including 16 different bioactive and smart materials and 4 solvents were 3D printed, and their printability was assessed. All ML methods were able to learn and predict the printability of a variety of inks based on their biomaterial formulations. In particular, the RF algorithm has achieved the highest accuracy (88.1%), precision (90.6%), and F1 score (87.0%), indicating the best overall performance out of the 3 algorithms, while DL has the highest recall (87.3%). Furthermore, the ML algorithms have predicted the printability window of biomaterials to guide the ink development. The printability map generated with DL has finer granularity than other algorithms. ML has proven to be an effective and novel strategy for developing biomaterial formulations with desired 3D printability for biomedical engineering applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10353544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AAAS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103535442023-07-19 Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing Chen, Hongyi Liu, Yuanchang Balabani, Stavroula Hirayama, Ryuji Huang, Jie Research (Wash D C) Research Article Three-dimensional (3D) printing is emerging as a transformative technology for biomedical engineering. The 3D printed product can be patient-specific by allowing customizability and direct control of the architecture. The trial-and-error approach currently used for developing the composition of printable inks is time- and resource-consuming due to the increasing number of variables requiring expert knowledge. Artificial intelligence has the potential to reshape the ink development process by forming a predictive model for printability from experimental data. In this paper, we constructed machine learning (ML) algorithms including decision tree, random forest (RF), and deep learning (DL) to predict the printability of biomaterials. A total of 210 formulations including 16 different bioactive and smart materials and 4 solvents were 3D printed, and their printability was assessed. All ML methods were able to learn and predict the printability of a variety of inks based on their biomaterial formulations. In particular, the RF algorithm has achieved the highest accuracy (88.1%), precision (90.6%), and F1 score (87.0%), indicating the best overall performance out of the 3 algorithms, while DL has the highest recall (87.3%). Furthermore, the ML algorithms have predicted the printability window of biomaterials to guide the ink development. The printability map generated with DL has finer granularity than other algorithms. ML has proven to be an effective and novel strategy for developing biomaterial formulations with desired 3D printability for biomedical engineering applications. AAAS 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10353544/ /pubmed/37469394 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/research.0197 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hongyi Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Exclusive licensee Science and Technology Review Publishing House. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Hongyi
Liu, Yuanchang
Balabani, Stavroula
Hirayama, Ryuji
Huang, Jie
Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing
title Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing
title_full Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing
title_fullStr Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing
title_short Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing
title_sort machine learning in predicting printable biomaterial formulations for direct ink writing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469394
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/research.0197
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhongyi machinelearninginpredictingprintablebiomaterialformulationsfordirectinkwriting
AT liuyuanchang machinelearninginpredictingprintablebiomaterialformulationsfordirectinkwriting
AT balabanistavroula machinelearninginpredictingprintablebiomaterialformulationsfordirectinkwriting
AT hirayamaryuji machinelearninginpredictingprintablebiomaterialformulationsfordirectinkwriting
AT huangjie machinelearninginpredictingprintablebiomaterialformulationsfordirectinkwriting