Implementation Status of Airborne Infection Control Measures in Primary and Secondary Public Health Facilities, Puducherry: A Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND: Poor ventilation in healthcare settings is a concern for airborne infections, particularly in light of the potential for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission. This study aimed to assess the implementation status of airborne infection control (AIC) measures in primary and secondary public healthcare facilities (HCFs) and to explore the facilitating factors and barriers in the implementation of AIC measures. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was adopted, which includes a cross-sectional descriptive study using a checklist to collect data on the implementation of AIC measures in 22 primary and two secondary public HCFs in Puducherry, South India, between October 2020 and February 2021. Further, key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted among medical officers (MOs). The qualitative data were manually analyzed, and transcripts created from handwritten notes and audio recordings were deductively evaluated. RESULTS: Of the twenty-four health facilities visited, 54.2% had infection control (IC) committees. Annual IC training was held for housekeeping staff, MOs, nurses, and laboratory technicians in 23 (95.8%), 21 (87.5%), 20 (83.4%), and 14 (58.4%) facilities, respectively. Respiratory symptomatic patients were counseled on cough etiquettes in 22 (91.6%) facilities. Adequate cross-ventilation was present in outpatient departments in 16 (66.6%) institutions. N95 masks and face shields were provided in 21 (87.5%) facilities. Training through the KAYAKALP program and the presence of a separate sputum collection area were facilitators of IC, while lack of patient adherence and delays in fund release were found as barriers. CONCLUSION: Overall, the AIC measures were well-implemented, but improvements are needed in infrastructure development for patient segregation in outpatient departments and dedicated AIC training for all healthcare personnel.