Cargando…
An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020
BACKGROUND: India accounted for 6% of global burden of malaria with 95% population residing in malaria endemic areas. However, Punjab is in the malaria elimination phase with annual parasite incidence (API) <1/1000 population. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated malaria surveillance system in Punjab using C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469921 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_305_22 |
_version_ | 1785074763551473664 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Sahil Goel, Kapil Kaushal, Kanica Grover, Gagandeep S. Dikid, Tanzin Singh, Gurinder B. |
author_facet | Sharma, Sahil Goel, Kapil Kaushal, Kanica Grover, Gagandeep S. Dikid, Tanzin Singh, Gurinder B. |
author_sort | Sharma, Sahil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: India accounted for 6% of global burden of malaria with 95% population residing in malaria endemic areas. However, Punjab is in the malaria elimination phase with annual parasite incidence (API) <1/1000 population. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated malaria surveillance system in Punjab using CDC’s updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems to provide recommendations for strengthening the existing system and to overcome the challenges in the path of malaria free Punjab. METHODS: We chose two districts of Punjab, Amritsar (lowest API) and Mansa (highest API), interviewed stakeholders, and performed a retrospective desk review. We evaluated the overall usefulness of the system and assessed seven attributes at state, district, health facility, and village level during July–August 2020. RESULTS: In Punjab, there was progressive decline in the malaria cases from 2,955 cases in 2009 to 1,140 in 2019 and no malaria deaths since 2011. Regarding various attributes, overall score for flexibility was good (85.9%); average for simplicity (77%), acceptability (74%), data quality (74%), and timeliness (70%); and poor for representativeness (59%) and stability (57%). CONCLUSIONS: Malaria surveillance system was useful in analyzing the trends of morbidity and mortality and for generating data to drive policy decisions. To improve stability, representativeness, and acceptability, surveillance staff should not be engaged in supplemental work, and reports from private sector must be ensured. Supportive supervision and regular trainings should be carried out regarding reporting formats, guidelines, and timely epidemiological investigations to improve timeliness, data quality, and simplicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10353677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103536772023-07-19 An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020 Sharma, Sahil Goel, Kapil Kaushal, Kanica Grover, Gagandeep S. Dikid, Tanzin Singh, Gurinder B. Indian J Community Med Original Article BACKGROUND: India accounted for 6% of global burden of malaria with 95% population residing in malaria endemic areas. However, Punjab is in the malaria elimination phase with annual parasite incidence (API) <1/1000 population. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated malaria surveillance system in Punjab using CDC’s updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems to provide recommendations for strengthening the existing system and to overcome the challenges in the path of malaria free Punjab. METHODS: We chose two districts of Punjab, Amritsar (lowest API) and Mansa (highest API), interviewed stakeholders, and performed a retrospective desk review. We evaluated the overall usefulness of the system and assessed seven attributes at state, district, health facility, and village level during July–August 2020. RESULTS: In Punjab, there was progressive decline in the malaria cases from 2,955 cases in 2009 to 1,140 in 2019 and no malaria deaths since 2011. Regarding various attributes, overall score for flexibility was good (85.9%); average for simplicity (77%), acceptability (74%), data quality (74%), and timeliness (70%); and poor for representativeness (59%) and stability (57%). CONCLUSIONS: Malaria surveillance system was useful in analyzing the trends of morbidity and mortality and for generating data to drive policy decisions. To improve stability, representativeness, and acceptability, surveillance staff should not be engaged in supplemental work, and reports from private sector must be ensured. Supportive supervision and regular trainings should be carried out regarding reporting formats, guidelines, and timely epidemiological investigations to improve timeliness, data quality, and simplicity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10353677/ /pubmed/37469921 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_305_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Community Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Sahil Goel, Kapil Kaushal, Kanica Grover, Gagandeep S. Dikid, Tanzin Singh, Gurinder B. An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020 |
title | An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020 |
title_full | An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020 |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020 |
title_short | An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020 |
title_sort | evaluation of malaria surveillance system in punjab, india, 2020 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469921 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_305_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmasahil anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT goelkapil anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT kaushalkanica anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT grovergagandeeps anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT dikidtanzin anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT singhgurinderb anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT sharmasahil evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT goelkapil evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT kaushalkanica evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT grovergagandeeps evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT dikidtanzin evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 AT singhgurinderb evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020 |