Cargando…

An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020

BACKGROUND: India accounted for 6% of global burden of malaria with 95% population residing in malaria endemic areas. However, Punjab is in the malaria elimination phase with annual parasite incidence (API) <1/1000 population. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated malaria surveillance system in Punjab using C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Sahil, Goel, Kapil, Kaushal, Kanica, Grover, Gagandeep S., Dikid, Tanzin, Singh, Gurinder B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469921
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_305_22
_version_ 1785074763551473664
author Sharma, Sahil
Goel, Kapil
Kaushal, Kanica
Grover, Gagandeep S.
Dikid, Tanzin
Singh, Gurinder B.
author_facet Sharma, Sahil
Goel, Kapil
Kaushal, Kanica
Grover, Gagandeep S.
Dikid, Tanzin
Singh, Gurinder B.
author_sort Sharma, Sahil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: India accounted for 6% of global burden of malaria with 95% population residing in malaria endemic areas. However, Punjab is in the malaria elimination phase with annual parasite incidence (API) <1/1000 population. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated malaria surveillance system in Punjab using CDC’s updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems to provide recommendations for strengthening the existing system and to overcome the challenges in the path of malaria free Punjab. METHODS: We chose two districts of Punjab, Amritsar (lowest API) and Mansa (highest API), interviewed stakeholders, and performed a retrospective desk review. We evaluated the overall usefulness of the system and assessed seven attributes at state, district, health facility, and village level during July–August 2020. RESULTS: In Punjab, there was progressive decline in the malaria cases from 2,955 cases in 2009 to 1,140 in 2019 and no malaria deaths since 2011. Regarding various attributes, overall score for flexibility was good (85.9%); average for simplicity (77%), acceptability (74%), data quality (74%), and timeliness (70%); and poor for representativeness (59%) and stability (57%). CONCLUSIONS: Malaria surveillance system was useful in analyzing the trends of morbidity and mortality and for generating data to drive policy decisions. To improve stability, representativeness, and acceptability, surveillance staff should not be engaged in supplemental work, and reports from private sector must be ensured. Supportive supervision and regular trainings should be carried out regarding reporting formats, guidelines, and timely epidemiological investigations to improve timeliness, data quality, and simplicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10353677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103536772023-07-19 An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020 Sharma, Sahil Goel, Kapil Kaushal, Kanica Grover, Gagandeep S. Dikid, Tanzin Singh, Gurinder B. Indian J Community Med Original Article BACKGROUND: India accounted for 6% of global burden of malaria with 95% population residing in malaria endemic areas. However, Punjab is in the malaria elimination phase with annual parasite incidence (API) <1/1000 population. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated malaria surveillance system in Punjab using CDC’s updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems to provide recommendations for strengthening the existing system and to overcome the challenges in the path of malaria free Punjab. METHODS: We chose two districts of Punjab, Amritsar (lowest API) and Mansa (highest API), interviewed stakeholders, and performed a retrospective desk review. We evaluated the overall usefulness of the system and assessed seven attributes at state, district, health facility, and village level during July–August 2020. RESULTS: In Punjab, there was progressive decline in the malaria cases from 2,955 cases in 2009 to 1,140 in 2019 and no malaria deaths since 2011. Regarding various attributes, overall score for flexibility was good (85.9%); average for simplicity (77%), acceptability (74%), data quality (74%), and timeliness (70%); and poor for representativeness (59%) and stability (57%). CONCLUSIONS: Malaria surveillance system was useful in analyzing the trends of morbidity and mortality and for generating data to drive policy decisions. To improve stability, representativeness, and acceptability, surveillance staff should not be engaged in supplemental work, and reports from private sector must be ensured. Supportive supervision and regular trainings should be carried out regarding reporting formats, guidelines, and timely epidemiological investigations to improve timeliness, data quality, and simplicity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10353677/ /pubmed/37469921 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_305_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Community Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Sahil
Goel, Kapil
Kaushal, Kanica
Grover, Gagandeep S.
Dikid, Tanzin
Singh, Gurinder B.
An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020
title An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020
title_full An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020
title_short An Evaluation of Malaria Surveillance System in Punjab, India, 2020
title_sort evaluation of malaria surveillance system in punjab, india, 2020
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469921
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_305_22
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmasahil anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT goelkapil anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT kaushalkanica anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT grovergagandeeps anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT dikidtanzin anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT singhgurinderb anevaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT sharmasahil evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT goelkapil evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT kaushalkanica evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT grovergagandeeps evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT dikidtanzin evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020
AT singhgurinderb evaluationofmalariasurveillancesysteminpunjabindia2020