Cargando…

Determining a Worldwide Prevalence of Oculocutaneous Albinism: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the available data on the epidemiology of oculocutaneous albinism (OCA) around the world, and to determine whether a generalizable, worldwide prevalence figure could be proposed. METHODS: Extensive literature search strategies were conduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kromberg, Jennifer G. R., Flynn, Kaitlyn A., Kerr, Robyn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.10.14
_version_ 1785074772169719808
author Kromberg, Jennifer G. R.
Flynn, Kaitlyn A.
Kerr, Robyn A.
author_facet Kromberg, Jennifer G. R.
Flynn, Kaitlyn A.
Kerr, Robyn A.
author_sort Kromberg, Jennifer G. R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the available data on the epidemiology of oculocutaneous albinism (OCA) around the world, and to determine whether a generalizable, worldwide prevalence figure could be proposed. METHODS: Extensive literature search strategies were conducted, interrogating PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to locate relevant literature. Ultimately 34 studies reporting original data were included for analysis. RESULTS: Findings showed that most data were outdated, and only 6 of 34 articles (18%) were published after 2010. There were few good studies with sound methodology and large, clearly defined population samples. Only a small proportion of countries worldwide (26/193 [13%]) have produced prevalence figures for OCA. By continent, African studies were disproportionately represented (15/34 [44%]). The highest prevalence rates (range, 1 in 22 to 1 in 1300; mean, 1 in 464) were reported in population isolates. The mean prevalence from four African countries was 1 in 4264 (range, 1 in 1755 to 1 in 7900). Prevalence for three countries in Europe (mean, 1 in 12,000; range, 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 15,000) may be underestimated, as the phenotype, in fair-skinned populations, may be missed or misdiagnosed as ocular albinism or isolated visual impairment. Population rates may vary depending on local cultural factors (e.g., consanguineous matings) and may change over time. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of OCA varies widely between continents and population groups, and it is often influenced by local factors. It was not possible, therefore, to determine a single, generalizable worldwide prevalence rate for OCA, although continental rates for Africa and Europe are useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10353740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103537402023-07-19 Determining a Worldwide Prevalence of Oculocutaneous Albinism: A Systematic Review Kromberg, Jennifer G. R. Flynn, Kaitlyn A. Kerr, Robyn A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Review PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the available data on the epidemiology of oculocutaneous albinism (OCA) around the world, and to determine whether a generalizable, worldwide prevalence figure could be proposed. METHODS: Extensive literature search strategies were conducted, interrogating PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to locate relevant literature. Ultimately 34 studies reporting original data were included for analysis. RESULTS: Findings showed that most data were outdated, and only 6 of 34 articles (18%) were published after 2010. There were few good studies with sound methodology and large, clearly defined population samples. Only a small proportion of countries worldwide (26/193 [13%]) have produced prevalence figures for OCA. By continent, African studies were disproportionately represented (15/34 [44%]). The highest prevalence rates (range, 1 in 22 to 1 in 1300; mean, 1 in 464) were reported in population isolates. The mean prevalence from four African countries was 1 in 4264 (range, 1 in 1755 to 1 in 7900). Prevalence for three countries in Europe (mean, 1 in 12,000; range, 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 15,000) may be underestimated, as the phenotype, in fair-skinned populations, may be missed or misdiagnosed as ocular albinism or isolated visual impairment. Population rates may vary depending on local cultural factors (e.g., consanguineous matings) and may change over time. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of OCA varies widely between continents and population groups, and it is often influenced by local factors. It was not possible, therefore, to determine a single, generalizable worldwide prevalence rate for OCA, although continental rates for Africa and Europe are useful. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10353740/ /pubmed/37440261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.10.14 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Review
Kromberg, Jennifer G. R.
Flynn, Kaitlyn A.
Kerr, Robyn A.
Determining a Worldwide Prevalence of Oculocutaneous Albinism: A Systematic Review
title Determining a Worldwide Prevalence of Oculocutaneous Albinism: A Systematic Review
title_full Determining a Worldwide Prevalence of Oculocutaneous Albinism: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Determining a Worldwide Prevalence of Oculocutaneous Albinism: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Determining a Worldwide Prevalence of Oculocutaneous Albinism: A Systematic Review
title_short Determining a Worldwide Prevalence of Oculocutaneous Albinism: A Systematic Review
title_sort determining a worldwide prevalence of oculocutaneous albinism: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.10.14
work_keys_str_mv AT krombergjennifergr determiningaworldwideprevalenceofoculocutaneousalbinismasystematicreview
AT flynnkaitlyna determiningaworldwideprevalenceofoculocutaneousalbinismasystematicreview
AT kerrrobyna determiningaworldwideprevalenceofoculocutaneousalbinismasystematicreview