Cargando…

Smartphone Photography as a Teledentistry Method to Evaluate Anterior Composite Restorations

OBJECTIVE: Today, teledentistry have gain more attention than past due to the advances in technology. The aim of this study was to compare the use of smartphone photography as a method in teledentistry with the face-to-face examination in the evaluation of anterior composite restorations. MATERIALS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh, Valizadeh-Haghi, Safa, Naslseraji, Nasim, Zandian, Hamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3171140
_version_ 1785074802212470784
author Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh
Valizadeh-Haghi, Safa
Naslseraji, Nasim
Zandian, Hamed
author_facet Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh
Valizadeh-Haghi, Safa
Naslseraji, Nasim
Zandian, Hamed
author_sort Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Today, teledentistry have gain more attention than past due to the advances in technology. The aim of this study was to compare the use of smartphone photography as a method in teledentistry with the face-to-face examination in the evaluation of anterior composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, photographs of 24 composite restorations in patients attended to the clinic of Ardabil Dental School were obtained using a smartphone without any additional equipment and sent by email to 10 remote observers. As a gold standard method, these restorations were evaluated by an experienced expert in restorative dentistry a face-to-face examination. In both methods FDI criteria were used to evaluate the restorations and classified them as acceptable or not. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of the photographic method relative to face-to-face method were calculated. Furthermore the Mann–Whitney U test was used to statistically compare the two methods in detail. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the smartphone photography method was 69.35%, 48.72%, 87.34%, and 23.75%, respectively. A diagnostic accuracy of 65.97% was obtained. Statistically, in overall the photographic method rated the restorations as better than they were in reality (face-to-face examination) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the method of evaluating anterior composite restorations by smartphone photography was moderate and the use of this method in teledentistry, although was promising, needs to be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10353899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103538992023-07-19 Smartphone Photography as a Teledentistry Method to Evaluate Anterior Composite Restorations Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh Valizadeh-Haghi, Safa Naslseraji, Nasim Zandian, Hamed Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVE: Today, teledentistry have gain more attention than past due to the advances in technology. The aim of this study was to compare the use of smartphone photography as a method in teledentistry with the face-to-face examination in the evaluation of anterior composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, photographs of 24 composite restorations in patients attended to the clinic of Ardabil Dental School were obtained using a smartphone without any additional equipment and sent by email to 10 remote observers. As a gold standard method, these restorations were evaluated by an experienced expert in restorative dentistry a face-to-face examination. In both methods FDI criteria were used to evaluate the restorations and classified them as acceptable or not. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of the photographic method relative to face-to-face method were calculated. Furthermore the Mann–Whitney U test was used to statistically compare the two methods in detail. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the smartphone photography method was 69.35%, 48.72%, 87.34%, and 23.75%, respectively. A diagnostic accuracy of 65.97% was obtained. Statistically, in overall the photographic method rated the restorations as better than they were in reality (face-to-face examination) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the method of evaluating anterior composite restorations by smartphone photography was moderate and the use of this method in teledentistry, although was promising, needs to be improved. Hindawi 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10353899/ /pubmed/37469491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3171140 Text en Copyright © 2023 Haleh Valizadeh-Haghi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh
Valizadeh-Haghi, Safa
Naslseraji, Nasim
Zandian, Hamed
Smartphone Photography as a Teledentistry Method to Evaluate Anterior Composite Restorations
title Smartphone Photography as a Teledentistry Method to Evaluate Anterior Composite Restorations
title_full Smartphone Photography as a Teledentistry Method to Evaluate Anterior Composite Restorations
title_fullStr Smartphone Photography as a Teledentistry Method to Evaluate Anterior Composite Restorations
title_full_unstemmed Smartphone Photography as a Teledentistry Method to Evaluate Anterior Composite Restorations
title_short Smartphone Photography as a Teledentistry Method to Evaluate Anterior Composite Restorations
title_sort smartphone photography as a teledentistry method to evaluate anterior composite restorations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3171140
work_keys_str_mv AT valizadehhaghihaleh smartphonephotographyasateledentistrymethodtoevaluateanteriorcompositerestorations
AT valizadehhaghisafa smartphonephotographyasateledentistrymethodtoevaluateanteriorcompositerestorations
AT naslserajinasim smartphonephotographyasateledentistrymethodtoevaluateanteriorcompositerestorations
AT zandianhamed smartphonephotographyasateledentistrymethodtoevaluateanteriorcompositerestorations