Cargando…
Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children under two years of age. Treatment in most cases is radiologically guided reduction. In Slovenia, ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction is currently the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37148276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1 |
_version_ | 1785074854355009536 |
---|---|
author | Pušnik, Luka Slak, Peter Nikšić, Stevan Winant, Abbey J. Lee, Edward Y. Plut, Domen |
author_facet | Pušnik, Luka Slak, Peter Nikšić, Stevan Winant, Abbey J. Lee, Edward Y. Plut, Domen |
author_sort | Pušnik, Luka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children under two years of age. Treatment in most cases is radiologically guided reduction. In Slovenia, ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction is currently the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of US-guided hydrostatic reduction when performed by subspecialty-trained pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with ileocolic intussusception who underwent US-guided hydrostatic intussusception reduction at University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2012 and December 2022 (n = 101). During regular daily working hours, the reduction was performed by pediatric radiologists. After hours (evenings and overnight), pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents performed the reduction procedure. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operator performing the procedure. Data was analyzed using the chi-square test. Pediatric radiologists had thirty-seven (75.5%) successful first attempts, non-pediatric radiologists had nineteen (76.0%), and radiology residents had twenty (74.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of ileocolic intussusception reduction depending on the operator who performed the procedure (p = 0.98). No perforation was observed in either group during the reduction attempts. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that US-guided hydrostatic reduction is a reliable and safe procedure that achieves good results even in the hands of less experienced, however appropriately trained, radiologists. The results should encourage more medical centers to consider the implementation of US-guided hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10354123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103541232023-07-20 Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents Pušnik, Luka Slak, Peter Nikšić, Stevan Winant, Abbey J. Lee, Edward Y. Plut, Domen Eur J Pediatr Research Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children under two years of age. Treatment in most cases is radiologically guided reduction. In Slovenia, ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction is currently the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of US-guided hydrostatic reduction when performed by subspecialty-trained pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with ileocolic intussusception who underwent US-guided hydrostatic intussusception reduction at University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2012 and December 2022 (n = 101). During regular daily working hours, the reduction was performed by pediatric radiologists. After hours (evenings and overnight), pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents performed the reduction procedure. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operator performing the procedure. Data was analyzed using the chi-square test. Pediatric radiologists had thirty-seven (75.5%) successful first attempts, non-pediatric radiologists had nineteen (76.0%), and radiology residents had twenty (74.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of ileocolic intussusception reduction depending on the operator who performed the procedure (p = 0.98). No perforation was observed in either group during the reduction attempts. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that US-guided hydrostatic reduction is a reliable and safe procedure that achieves good results even in the hands of less experienced, however appropriately trained, radiologists. The results should encourage more medical centers to consider the implementation of US-guided hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10354123/ /pubmed/37148276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Pušnik, Luka Slak, Peter Nikšić, Stevan Winant, Abbey J. Lee, Edward Y. Plut, Domen Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents |
title | Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents |
title_full | Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents |
title_short | Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents |
title_sort | ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37148276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pusnikluka ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents AT slakpeter ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents AT niksicstevan ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents AT winantabbeyj ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents AT leeedwardy ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents AT plutdomen ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents |