Cargando…

Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents

Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children under two years of age. Treatment in most cases is radiologically guided reduction. In Slovenia, ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction is currently the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pušnik, Luka, Slak, Peter, Nikšić, Stevan, Winant, Abbey J., Lee, Edward Y., Plut, Domen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37148276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1
_version_ 1785074854355009536
author Pušnik, Luka
Slak, Peter
Nikšić, Stevan
Winant, Abbey J.
Lee, Edward Y.
Plut, Domen
author_facet Pušnik, Luka
Slak, Peter
Nikšić, Stevan
Winant, Abbey J.
Lee, Edward Y.
Plut, Domen
author_sort Pušnik, Luka
collection PubMed
description Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children under two years of age. Treatment in most cases is radiologically guided reduction. In Slovenia, ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction is currently the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of US-guided hydrostatic reduction when performed by subspecialty-trained pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with ileocolic intussusception who underwent US-guided hydrostatic intussusception reduction at University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2012 and December 2022 (n = 101). During regular daily working hours, the reduction was performed by pediatric radiologists. After hours (evenings and overnight), pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents performed the reduction procedure. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operator performing the procedure. Data was analyzed using the chi-square test. Pediatric radiologists had thirty-seven (75.5%) successful first attempts, non-pediatric radiologists had nineteen (76.0%), and radiology residents had twenty (74.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of ileocolic intussusception reduction depending on the operator who performed the procedure (p = 0.98). No perforation was observed in either group during the reduction attempts.   Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that US-guided hydrostatic reduction is a reliable and safe procedure that achieves good results even in the hands of less experienced, however appropriately trained, radiologists. The results should encourage more medical centers to consider the implementation of US-guided hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10354123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103541232023-07-20 Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents Pušnik, Luka Slak, Peter Nikšić, Stevan Winant, Abbey J. Lee, Edward Y. Plut, Domen Eur J Pediatr Research Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children under two years of age. Treatment in most cases is radiologically guided reduction. In Slovenia, ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction is currently the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of US-guided hydrostatic reduction when performed by subspecialty-trained pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with ileocolic intussusception who underwent US-guided hydrostatic intussusception reduction at University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2012 and December 2022 (n = 101). During regular daily working hours, the reduction was performed by pediatric radiologists. After hours (evenings and overnight), pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents performed the reduction procedure. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operator performing the procedure. Data was analyzed using the chi-square test. Pediatric radiologists had thirty-seven (75.5%) successful first attempts, non-pediatric radiologists had nineteen (76.0%), and radiology residents had twenty (74.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of ileocolic intussusception reduction depending on the operator who performed the procedure (p = 0.98). No perforation was observed in either group during the reduction attempts.   Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that US-guided hydrostatic reduction is a reliable and safe procedure that achieves good results even in the hands of less experienced, however appropriately trained, radiologists. The results should encourage more medical centers to consider the implementation of US-guided hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10354123/ /pubmed/37148276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Pušnik, Luka
Slak, Peter
Nikšić, Stevan
Winant, Abbey J.
Lee, Edward Y.
Plut, Domen
Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
title Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
title_full Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
title_short Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
title_sort ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37148276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pusnikluka ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents
AT slakpeter ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents
AT niksicstevan ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents
AT winantabbeyj ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents
AT leeedwardy ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents
AT plutdomen ultrasoundguidedhydrostaticreductionofintussusceptioncomparisonofsuccessratesbetweensubspecializedpediatricradiologistsandnonpediatricradiologistsorradiologyresidents