Cargando…

Development of a patient-centred electronic review template to support self-management in primary care: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Electronic templates are frequently used in long-term condition (LTC) reviews (for example, asthma) to act as reminders and improve documentation; however, they can restrict patient-centred care and opportunities for patients to discuss concerns and self-management. AIM: The IMPlementing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McClatchey, Kirstie, Sheldon, Aimee, Steed, Liz, Sheringham, Jessica, Appiagyei, Francis, Price, David, Hammersley, Vicky, Taylor, Stephanie, Pinnock, Hilary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36868789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0165
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Electronic templates are frequently used in long-term condition (LTC) reviews (for example, asthma) to act as reminders and improve documentation; however, they can restrict patient-centred care and opportunities for patients to discuss concerns and self-management. AIM: The IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP(2)ART) programme aimed to develop a patient-centred asthma review template that encourages supported self-management. DESIGN & SETTING: This was a mixed-methods study, which integrated qualitative and systematic review data, primary care Professional Advisory Group feedback, and qualitative data from clinician interviews. METHOD: Aligned with the Medical Research Council complex intervention framework, a template was developed in the following three phases: (1) development phase, which consisted of a qualitative exploration with clinicians and patients, a systematic review, and prototype template development; (2) feasibility pilot phase, which involved feedback from clinicians (n = 7); and (3) pre-piloting phase, which consisted of delivering the template within the IMP(2)ART implementation strategy (incorporating the template with patient and professional resources) and eliciting clinician feedback (n = 6). RESULTS: Template development was guided by the preliminary qualitative work and the systematic review. A prototype template was developed with an opening question to establish patient agendas, and a closing prompt to confirm agendas have been addressed and an asthma action plan provided. The feasibility pilot identified refinements needed, including focusing the opening question on asthma. Pre-piloting ensured integration with the IMP(2)ART strategy. CONCLUSION: Following the multi-stage development process, the implementation strategy, including the asthma review template, is now being tested in a cluster randomised controlled trial.