Cargando…
Perspectives on scientific error
Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published findings do not replicate and are likely false. The current position paper provides a broad perspective on scientific error, which may lead to replication failures. This broad perspective focuses on refor...
Autores principales: | van Ravenzwaaij, D., Bakker, M., Heesen, R., Romero, F., van Dongen, N., Crüwell, S., Field, S. M., Held, L., Munafò, M. R., Pittelkow, M. M., Tiokhin, L., Traag, V. A., van den Akker, O. R., van ‘t Veer, A. E., Wagenmakers, E. J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230448 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered report
por: Field, Sarahanne M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider?
por: Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
When numbers fail: do researchers agree on operationalization of published research?
por: Haucke, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Preregistration in diverse contexts: a preregistration template for the application of cognitive models
por: Crüwell, Sophia, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
How best to quantify replication success? A simulation study on the comparison of replication success metrics
por: Muradchanian, Jasmine, et al.
Publicado: (2021)