Cargando…

Comparison of Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA monitoring in wastewater has become an important tool for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance. Grab (quantitative) and passive samples (qualitative) are two distinct wastewater sampling methods. Although many...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Pengbo, Guo, Lizheng, Cavallo, Matthew, Cantrell, Caleb, Hilton, Stephen Patrick, Nguyen, Anh, Long, Audrey, Dunbar, Jillian, Barbero, Robbie, Barclay, Robert, Sablon, Orlando, Wolfe, Marlene, Lepene, Ben, Moe, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476666
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1215311
_version_ 1785074945073610752
author Liu, Pengbo
Guo, Lizheng
Cavallo, Matthew
Cantrell, Caleb
Hilton, Stephen Patrick
Nguyen, Anh
Long, Audrey
Dunbar, Jillian
Barbero, Robbie
Barclay, Robert
Sablon, Orlando
Wolfe, Marlene
Lepene, Ben
Moe, Christine
author_facet Liu, Pengbo
Guo, Lizheng
Cavallo, Matthew
Cantrell, Caleb
Hilton, Stephen Patrick
Nguyen, Anh
Long, Audrey
Dunbar, Jillian
Barbero, Robbie
Barclay, Robert
Sablon, Orlando
Wolfe, Marlene
Lepene, Ben
Moe, Christine
author_sort Liu, Pengbo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA monitoring in wastewater has become an important tool for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance. Grab (quantitative) and passive samples (qualitative) are two distinct wastewater sampling methods. Although many viral concentration methods such as the usage of membrane filtration and skim milk are reported, these methods generally require large volumes of wastewater, expensive lab equipment, and laborious processes. METHODS: The objectives of this study were to compare two workflows (Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles coupled with MagMax kit and membrane filtration workflows coupled with RNeasy kit) for SARS-CoV-2 recovery in grab samples and two workflows (Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles and skim milk workflows coupled with MagMax kit) for SARS-CoV-2 recovery in Moore swab samples. The Nanotrap particle workflow was initially evaluated with and without the addition of the enhancement reagent 1 (ER1) in 10 mL wastewater. RT-qPCR targeting the nucleocapsid protein was used for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA. RESULTS: Adding ER1 to wastewater prior to viral concentration significantly improved viral concentration results (P < 0.0001) in 10 mL grab and swab samples processed by automated or manual Nanotrap workflows. SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in 10 mL grab and Moore swab samples with ER1 processed by the automated workflow as a whole showed significantly higher (P < 0.001) results than 150 mL grab samples using the membrane filtration workflow and 250 mL swab samples using the skim milk workflow, respectively. Spiking known genome copies (GC) of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 into 10 mL wastewater indicated that the limit of detection of the automated Nanotrap workflow was ~11.5 GC/mL using the RT-qPCR and 115 GC/mL using the digital PCR methods. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that Nanotrap workflows could substitute the traditional membrane filtration and skim milk workflows for viral concentration without compromising the assay sensitivity. The manual workflow can be used in resource-limited areas, and the automated workflow is appropriate for large-scale COVID-19 wastewater-based surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10354513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103545132023-07-20 Comparison of Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater Liu, Pengbo Guo, Lizheng Cavallo, Matthew Cantrell, Caleb Hilton, Stephen Patrick Nguyen, Anh Long, Audrey Dunbar, Jillian Barbero, Robbie Barclay, Robert Sablon, Orlando Wolfe, Marlene Lepene, Ben Moe, Christine Front Microbiol Microbiology INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA monitoring in wastewater has become an important tool for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance. Grab (quantitative) and passive samples (qualitative) are two distinct wastewater sampling methods. Although many viral concentration methods such as the usage of membrane filtration and skim milk are reported, these methods generally require large volumes of wastewater, expensive lab equipment, and laborious processes. METHODS: The objectives of this study were to compare two workflows (Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles coupled with MagMax kit and membrane filtration workflows coupled with RNeasy kit) for SARS-CoV-2 recovery in grab samples and two workflows (Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles and skim milk workflows coupled with MagMax kit) for SARS-CoV-2 recovery in Moore swab samples. The Nanotrap particle workflow was initially evaluated with and without the addition of the enhancement reagent 1 (ER1) in 10 mL wastewater. RT-qPCR targeting the nucleocapsid protein was used for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA. RESULTS: Adding ER1 to wastewater prior to viral concentration significantly improved viral concentration results (P < 0.0001) in 10 mL grab and swab samples processed by automated or manual Nanotrap workflows. SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in 10 mL grab and Moore swab samples with ER1 processed by the automated workflow as a whole showed significantly higher (P < 0.001) results than 150 mL grab samples using the membrane filtration workflow and 250 mL swab samples using the skim milk workflow, respectively. Spiking known genome copies (GC) of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 into 10 mL wastewater indicated that the limit of detection of the automated Nanotrap workflow was ~11.5 GC/mL using the RT-qPCR and 115 GC/mL using the digital PCR methods. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that Nanotrap workflows could substitute the traditional membrane filtration and skim milk workflows for viral concentration without compromising the assay sensitivity. The manual workflow can be used in resource-limited areas, and the automated workflow is appropriate for large-scale COVID-19 wastewater-based surveillance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10354513/ /pubmed/37476666 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1215311 Text en Copyright © 2023 Liu, Guo, Cavallo, Cantrell, Hilton, Nguyen, Long, Dunbar, Barbero, Barclay, Sablon, Wolfe, Lepene and Moe. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Liu, Pengbo
Guo, Lizheng
Cavallo, Matthew
Cantrell, Caleb
Hilton, Stephen Patrick
Nguyen, Anh
Long, Audrey
Dunbar, Jillian
Barbero, Robbie
Barclay, Robert
Sablon, Orlando
Wolfe, Marlene
Lepene, Ben
Moe, Christine
Comparison of Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater
title Comparison of Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater
title_full Comparison of Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater
title_fullStr Comparison of Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater
title_short Comparison of Nanotrap(®) Microbiome A Particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater
title_sort comparison of nanotrap(®) microbiome a particles, membrane filtration, and skim milk workflows for sars-cov-2 concentration in wastewater
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476666
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1215311
work_keys_str_mv AT liupengbo comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT guolizheng comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT cavallomatthew comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT cantrellcaleb comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT hiltonstephenpatrick comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT nguyenanh comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT longaudrey comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT dunbarjillian comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT barberorobbie comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT barclayrobert comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT sablonorlando comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT wolfemarlene comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT lepeneben comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater
AT moechristine comparisonofnanotrapmicrobiomeaparticlesmembranefiltrationandskimmilkworkflowsforsarscov2concentrationinwastewater