Cargando…

“No Good Choice”: What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?

BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in methamphetamine use and subsequent hospitalizations, the majority of Canadian hospitals currently lack harm reduction strategies for substance use. This can mean that people with lived experience of methamphetamine use are faced with a number of difficult decisions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forchuk, Cheryl, Serrato, Jonathan, Scott, Leanne, Rudnick, Abraham, Dickey, Chandlee, Silverman, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11782218231186065
_version_ 1785075003395407872
author Forchuk, Cheryl
Serrato, Jonathan
Scott, Leanne
Rudnick, Abraham
Dickey, Chandlee
Silverman, Michael
author_facet Forchuk, Cheryl
Serrato, Jonathan
Scott, Leanne
Rudnick, Abraham
Dickey, Chandlee
Silverman, Michael
author_sort Forchuk, Cheryl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in methamphetamine use and subsequent hospitalizations, the majority of Canadian hospitals currently lack harm reduction strategies for substance use. This can mean that people with lived experience of methamphetamine use are faced with a number of difficult decisions to make when admitted to hospital. Caring for people with lived experience of methamphetamine use can also be problematic with zero tolerance policies requiring abstinence to be maintained. This analysis set out to understand potential health care issues due to a lack of harm reduction strategies from the prospective of people with lived experience of methamphetamine use as well as health care/service professionals. METHODS: Based on a larger study, this secondary analysis explored issues discussed by people with lived experience of methamphetamine use and health care/service professionals regarding the challenges of providing harm reduction approaches in the hospital setting. A total of 108 individuals with lived experience of methamphetamine use completed a qualitative component of a mixed-method interview. In addition, 31 health care/service professionals participated in virtual focus groups and one-to-one interviews. Responses were analyzed using an ethnographic thematic approach. RESULTS: People with lived experience of methamphetamine use reported 3 choices upon admission: leave or avoid the hospital, stay but experience unsupported withdrawal, or stay but hide their substance usage from health care professionals. Health care/service professionals described 2 options: uphold zero tolerance that can lead to stigma and a lack of knowledge regarding addiction, or accept harm reduction but be unable to implement such strategies. This could lead to health being compromised due to policy and practice that requires abstinence. Neither group of participants described a good choice for them. CONCLUSION: Current policy and education related to substance use needs to be revised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10354823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103548232023-07-20 “No Good Choice”: What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals? Forchuk, Cheryl Serrato, Jonathan Scott, Leanne Rudnick, Abraham Dickey, Chandlee Silverman, Michael Subst Abuse Original Research BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in methamphetamine use and subsequent hospitalizations, the majority of Canadian hospitals currently lack harm reduction strategies for substance use. This can mean that people with lived experience of methamphetamine use are faced with a number of difficult decisions to make when admitted to hospital. Caring for people with lived experience of methamphetamine use can also be problematic with zero tolerance policies requiring abstinence to be maintained. This analysis set out to understand potential health care issues due to a lack of harm reduction strategies from the prospective of people with lived experience of methamphetamine use as well as health care/service professionals. METHODS: Based on a larger study, this secondary analysis explored issues discussed by people with lived experience of methamphetamine use and health care/service professionals regarding the challenges of providing harm reduction approaches in the hospital setting. A total of 108 individuals with lived experience of methamphetamine use completed a qualitative component of a mixed-method interview. In addition, 31 health care/service professionals participated in virtual focus groups and one-to-one interviews. Responses were analyzed using an ethnographic thematic approach. RESULTS: People with lived experience of methamphetamine use reported 3 choices upon admission: leave or avoid the hospital, stay but experience unsupported withdrawal, or stay but hide their substance usage from health care professionals. Health care/service professionals described 2 options: uphold zero tolerance that can lead to stigma and a lack of knowledge regarding addiction, or accept harm reduction but be unable to implement such strategies. This could lead to health being compromised due to policy and practice that requires abstinence. Neither group of participants described a good choice for them. CONCLUSION: Current policy and education related to substance use needs to be revised. SAGE Publications 2023-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10354823/ /pubmed/37476501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11782218231186065 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Forchuk, Cheryl
Serrato, Jonathan
Scott, Leanne
Rudnick, Abraham
Dickey, Chandlee
Silverman, Michael
“No Good Choice”: What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?
title “No Good Choice”: What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?
title_full “No Good Choice”: What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?
title_fullStr “No Good Choice”: What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?
title_full_unstemmed “No Good Choice”: What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?
title_short “No Good Choice”: What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?
title_sort “no good choice”: what are the issues of having no harm reduction strategies in hospitals?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11782218231186065
work_keys_str_mv AT forchukcheryl nogoodchoicewhataretheissuesofhavingnoharmreductionstrategiesinhospitals
AT serratojonathan nogoodchoicewhataretheissuesofhavingnoharmreductionstrategiesinhospitals
AT scottleanne nogoodchoicewhataretheissuesofhavingnoharmreductionstrategiesinhospitals
AT rudnickabraham nogoodchoicewhataretheissuesofhavingnoharmreductionstrategiesinhospitals
AT dickeychandlee nogoodchoicewhataretheissuesofhavingnoharmreductionstrategiesinhospitals
AT silvermanmichael nogoodchoicewhataretheissuesofhavingnoharmreductionstrategiesinhospitals