Cargando…

Effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer

In volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the effect of an increase in skin surface dose due to topical agents might be negligible. We investigated the bolus effects of three types of topical agents in VMAT for head and neck cancer (HNC). Topical agents of different thicknesses (0.1, 0.5 and 2 mm)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ueda, Hikari, Ueda, Yoshihiro, Ikawa, Toshiki, Ohira, Shingo, Miyazaki, Masayoshi, Enomoto, Kazumi, Sakai, Kayo, Konishi, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37280131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrad035
_version_ 1785075009834713088
author Ueda, Hikari
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Ikawa, Toshiki
Ohira, Shingo
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Enomoto, Kazumi
Sakai, Kayo
Konishi, Koji
author_facet Ueda, Hikari
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Ikawa, Toshiki
Ohira, Shingo
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Enomoto, Kazumi
Sakai, Kayo
Konishi, Koji
author_sort Ueda, Hikari
collection PubMed
description In volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the effect of an increase in skin surface dose due to topical agents might be negligible. We investigated the bolus effects of three types of topical agents in VMAT for head and neck cancer (HNC). Topical agents of different thicknesses (0.1, 0.5 and 2 mm) were prepared. When each topical agent was set, the surface doses were measured for the anterior static field and VMAT, with and without a thermoplastic mask. No significant differences were observed among the three topical agents. For topical agent thicknesses of 0.1, 0.5 and 2 mm, the increases in surface dose for the anterior static field without the thermoplastic mask were 7–9, 30–31 and 81–84%, respectively. With the thermoplastic mask, the corresponding increases were 5, 12–15 and 41–43%, respectively. The increases in surface dose for VMAT without the thermoplastic mask were 5–8, 16–19 and 36–39%, respectively, and those with the thermoplastic mask were 4, 7–10 and 15–19%, respectively. The rate of increase in surface dose with the thermoplastic mask was smaller than that without the thermoplastic mask. The increase in surface dose with topical agents of clinical standard thickness (0.02 mm) was estimated to be 2% with the thermoplastic mask. The increase in surface dose with topical agents in dosimetric simulation, compared with control situation, is not significant in clinical conditions for HNC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10354852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103548522023-07-20 Effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer Ueda, Hikari Ueda, Yoshihiro Ikawa, Toshiki Ohira, Shingo Miyazaki, Masayoshi Enomoto, Kazumi Sakai, Kayo Konishi, Koji J Radiat Res Regular paper In volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the effect of an increase in skin surface dose due to topical agents might be negligible. We investigated the bolus effects of three types of topical agents in VMAT for head and neck cancer (HNC). Topical agents of different thicknesses (0.1, 0.5 and 2 mm) were prepared. When each topical agent was set, the surface doses were measured for the anterior static field and VMAT, with and without a thermoplastic mask. No significant differences were observed among the three topical agents. For topical agent thicknesses of 0.1, 0.5 and 2 mm, the increases in surface dose for the anterior static field without the thermoplastic mask were 7–9, 30–31 and 81–84%, respectively. With the thermoplastic mask, the corresponding increases were 5, 12–15 and 41–43%, respectively. The increases in surface dose for VMAT without the thermoplastic mask were 5–8, 16–19 and 36–39%, respectively, and those with the thermoplastic mask were 4, 7–10 and 15–19%, respectively. The rate of increase in surface dose with the thermoplastic mask was smaller than that without the thermoplastic mask. The increase in surface dose with topical agents of clinical standard thickness (0.02 mm) was estimated to be 2% with the thermoplastic mask. The increase in surface dose with topical agents in dosimetric simulation, compared with control situation, is not significant in clinical conditions for HNC patients. Oxford University Press 2023-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10354852/ /pubmed/37280131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrad035 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular paper
Ueda, Hikari
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Ikawa, Toshiki
Ohira, Shingo
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Enomoto, Kazumi
Sakai, Kayo
Konishi, Koji
Effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
title Effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
title_full Effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
title_short Effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
title_sort effect of topical agents on skin surface dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
topic Regular paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37280131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrad035
work_keys_str_mv AT uedahikari effectoftopicalagentsonskinsurfacedoseinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadandneckcancer
AT uedayoshihiro effectoftopicalagentsonskinsurfacedoseinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadandneckcancer
AT ikawatoshiki effectoftopicalagentsonskinsurfacedoseinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadandneckcancer
AT ohirashingo effectoftopicalagentsonskinsurfacedoseinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadandneckcancer
AT miyazakimasayoshi effectoftopicalagentsonskinsurfacedoseinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadandneckcancer
AT enomotokazumi effectoftopicalagentsonskinsurfacedoseinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadandneckcancer
AT sakaikayo effectoftopicalagentsonskinsurfacedoseinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadandneckcancer
AT konishikoji effectoftopicalagentsonskinsurfacedoseinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadandneckcancer