Cargando…
Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit
BACKGROUND: The earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest U.S. poverty alleviation program for low-income families, disbursed annually as a lump-sum tax refund. Despite its well-documented health impacts, the mechanisms through which the EITC affects health are not well understood. The objectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37468839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1 |
_version_ | 1785075021288308736 |
---|---|
author | Hamad, Rita Yeb, Joseph Jackson, Kaitlyn Gosliner, Wendi Fernald, Lia C.H. |
author_facet | Hamad, Rita Yeb, Joseph Jackson, Kaitlyn Gosliner, Wendi Fernald, Lia C.H. |
author_sort | Hamad, Rita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest U.S. poverty alleviation program for low-income families, disbursed annually as a lump-sum tax refund. Despite its well-documented health impacts, the mechanisms through which the EITC affects health are not well understood. The objective of this analysis was to examine self-reported spending patterns of tax refunds among EITC recipients to clarify potential pathways through which income may affect health. METHODS: We first examined spending patterns among 2020–2021 Assessing California Communities’ Experiences with Safety Net Supports (ACCESS) study participants (N = 241) and then stratified the analysis by key demographic subgroups. RESULTS: More than half of EITC recipients reported spending their tax refunds on bills and debt (52.3%), followed by 49.4% on housing, and 37.8% on vehicles. Only 3.3% reported spending on healthcare. (Note: respondents could list more than one possible spending category.) Participants ages 30 + were more likely to spend on bills and debt relative to those ages 18–29 (57.6% versus 39.4%, respectively). Other subgroup analyses did not yield significant findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that EITC recipients primarily use their refunds on bills and debt, as well as on household and vehicle expenses. This supports the idea of the EITC as a safety net policy which addresses key social determinants of health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10354901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103549012023-07-20 Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit Hamad, Rita Yeb, Joseph Jackson, Kaitlyn Gosliner, Wendi Fernald, Lia C.H. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest U.S. poverty alleviation program for low-income families, disbursed annually as a lump-sum tax refund. Despite its well-documented health impacts, the mechanisms through which the EITC affects health are not well understood. The objective of this analysis was to examine self-reported spending patterns of tax refunds among EITC recipients to clarify potential pathways through which income may affect health. METHODS: We first examined spending patterns among 2020–2021 Assessing California Communities’ Experiences with Safety Net Supports (ACCESS) study participants (N = 241) and then stratified the analysis by key demographic subgroups. RESULTS: More than half of EITC recipients reported spending their tax refunds on bills and debt (52.3%), followed by 49.4% on housing, and 37.8% on vehicles. Only 3.3% reported spending on healthcare. (Note: respondents could list more than one possible spending category.) Participants ages 30 + were more likely to spend on bills and debt relative to those ages 18–29 (57.6% versus 39.4%, respectively). Other subgroup analyses did not yield significant findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that EITC recipients primarily use their refunds on bills and debt, as well as on household and vehicle expenses. This supports the idea of the EITC as a safety net policy which addresses key social determinants of health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1. BioMed Central 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10354901/ /pubmed/37468839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hamad, Rita Yeb, Joseph Jackson, Kaitlyn Gosliner, Wendi Fernald, Lia C.H. Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit |
title | Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit |
title_full | Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit |
title_fullStr | Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit |
title_full_unstemmed | Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit |
title_short | Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit |
title_sort | potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the u.s. earned income tax credit |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37468839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamadrita potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit AT yebjoseph potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit AT jacksonkaitlyn potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit AT goslinerwendi potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit AT fernaldliach potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit |