Cargando…

Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit

BACKGROUND: The earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest U.S. poverty alleviation program for low-income families, disbursed annually as a lump-sum tax refund. Despite its well-documented health impacts, the mechanisms through which the EITC affects health are not well understood. The objectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamad, Rita, Yeb, Joseph, Jackson, Kaitlyn, Gosliner, Wendi, Fernald, Lia C.H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37468839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1
_version_ 1785075021288308736
author Hamad, Rita
Yeb, Joseph
Jackson, Kaitlyn
Gosliner, Wendi
Fernald, Lia C.H.
author_facet Hamad, Rita
Yeb, Joseph
Jackson, Kaitlyn
Gosliner, Wendi
Fernald, Lia C.H.
author_sort Hamad, Rita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest U.S. poverty alleviation program for low-income families, disbursed annually as a lump-sum tax refund. Despite its well-documented health impacts, the mechanisms through which the EITC affects health are not well understood. The objective of this analysis was to examine self-reported spending patterns of tax refunds among EITC recipients to clarify potential pathways through which income may affect health. METHODS: We first examined spending patterns among 2020–2021 Assessing California Communities’ Experiences with Safety Net Supports (ACCESS) study participants (N = 241) and then stratified the analysis by key demographic subgroups. RESULTS: More than half of EITC recipients reported spending their tax refunds on bills and debt (52.3%), followed by 49.4% on housing, and 37.8% on vehicles. Only 3.3% reported spending on healthcare. (Note: respondents could list more than one possible spending category.) Participants ages 30 + were more likely to spend on bills and debt relative to those ages 18–29 (57.6% versus 39.4%, respectively). Other subgroup analyses did not yield significant findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that EITC recipients primarily use their refunds on bills and debt, as well as on household and vehicle expenses. This supports the idea of the EITC as a safety net policy which addresses key social determinants of health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10354901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103549012023-07-20 Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit Hamad, Rita Yeb, Joseph Jackson, Kaitlyn Gosliner, Wendi Fernald, Lia C.H. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest U.S. poverty alleviation program for low-income families, disbursed annually as a lump-sum tax refund. Despite its well-documented health impacts, the mechanisms through which the EITC affects health are not well understood. The objective of this analysis was to examine self-reported spending patterns of tax refunds among EITC recipients to clarify potential pathways through which income may affect health. METHODS: We first examined spending patterns among 2020–2021 Assessing California Communities’ Experiences with Safety Net Supports (ACCESS) study participants (N = 241) and then stratified the analysis by key demographic subgroups. RESULTS: More than half of EITC recipients reported spending their tax refunds on bills and debt (52.3%), followed by 49.4% on housing, and 37.8% on vehicles. Only 3.3% reported spending on healthcare. (Note: respondents could list more than one possible spending category.) Participants ages 30 + were more likely to spend on bills and debt relative to those ages 18–29 (57.6% versus 39.4%, respectively). Other subgroup analyses did not yield significant findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that EITC recipients primarily use their refunds on bills and debt, as well as on household and vehicle expenses. This supports the idea of the EITC as a safety net policy which addresses key social determinants of health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1. BioMed Central 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10354901/ /pubmed/37468839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hamad, Rita
Yeb, Joseph
Jackson, Kaitlyn
Gosliner, Wendi
Fernald, Lia C.H.
Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit
title Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit
title_full Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit
title_fullStr Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit
title_full_unstemmed Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit
title_short Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit
title_sort potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the u.s. earned income tax credit
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37468839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hamadrita potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit
AT yebjoseph potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit
AT jacksonkaitlyn potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit
AT goslinerwendi potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit
AT fernaldliach potentialmechanismslinkingpovertyalleviationandhealthananalysisofbenefitspendingamongrecipientsoftheusearnedincometaxcredit