Cargando…
Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke. METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-ph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9 |
_version_ | 1785075049407971328 |
---|---|
author | Térémetz, Maxime Hamdoun, Sonia Colle, Florence Gerardin, Eloïse Desvilles, Claire Carment, Loïc Charron, Sylvain Cuenca, Macarena Calvet, David Baron, Jean-Claude Turc, Guillaume Maier, Marc A. Rosso, Charlotte Mas, Jean-Louis Lindberg, Påvel G. |
author_facet | Térémetz, Maxime Hamdoun, Sonia Colle, Florence Gerardin, Eloïse Desvilles, Claire Carment, Loïc Charron, Sylvain Cuenca, Macarena Calvet, David Baron, Jean-Claude Turc, Guillaume Maier, Marc A. Rosso, Charlotte Mas, Jean-Louis Lindberg, Påvel G. |
author_sort | Térémetz, Maxime |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke. METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-phase post-stroke patients with mild-to-moderate dexterity impairment (Box and Block Test (BBT) > 1) received 12 sessions of Dextrain or CT. Blinded measures were obtained before and after training and at 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was BBT-change (after–before training). Secondary outcomes included changes in motor impairments, activity limitations and dexterity components. Corticospinal excitability and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation. RESULTS: BBT-change after training did not differ between the Dextrain (N = 21) vs CT group (N = 21) (median [IQR] = 5[2–7] vs 4[2–7], respectively; P = 0.36). Gains in BBT were maintained at the 3-month post-training follow-up, with a non-significant trend for enhanced BBT-change in the Dextrain group (median [IQR] = 3[− 1–7.0], P = 0.06). Several secondary outcomes showed significantly larger changes in the Dextrain group: finger tracking precision (mean ± SD = 0.3 ± 0.3N vs − 0.1 ± 0.33N; P < 0.0018), independent finger movements (34.7 ± 25.1 ms vs 7.7 ± 18.5 ms, P = 0.02) and maximal finger tapping speed (8.4 ± 7.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.045). At follow-up, Dextrain group showed significantly greater improvement in Motor Activity Log (median/IQR = 0.7/0.2–0.8 vs 0.2/0.1–0.6, P = 0.05). Across both groups SICI increased in patients with greater BBT-change (Rho = 0.80, P = 0.006). Comparing Dextrain subgroups with maximal grip force higher/lower than median (61.2%), BBT-change was significantly larger in patients with low vs high grip force (7.5 ± 5.6 vs 2.9 ± 2.8; respectively, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Although immediate improvements in gross dexterity post-stroke did not significantly differ between Dextrain training and CT, our findings suggest that Dextrain enhances recovery of several dexterity components and reported hand-use, particularly when motor impairment is moderate (low initial grip force). Findings need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934073 (retrospectively registered) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10355015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103550152023-07-20 Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial Térémetz, Maxime Hamdoun, Sonia Colle, Florence Gerardin, Eloïse Desvilles, Claire Carment, Loïc Charron, Sylvain Cuenca, Macarena Calvet, David Baron, Jean-Claude Turc, Guillaume Maier, Marc A. Rosso, Charlotte Mas, Jean-Louis Lindberg, Påvel G. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke. METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-phase post-stroke patients with mild-to-moderate dexterity impairment (Box and Block Test (BBT) > 1) received 12 sessions of Dextrain or CT. Blinded measures were obtained before and after training and at 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was BBT-change (after–before training). Secondary outcomes included changes in motor impairments, activity limitations and dexterity components. Corticospinal excitability and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation. RESULTS: BBT-change after training did not differ between the Dextrain (N = 21) vs CT group (N = 21) (median [IQR] = 5[2–7] vs 4[2–7], respectively; P = 0.36). Gains in BBT were maintained at the 3-month post-training follow-up, with a non-significant trend for enhanced BBT-change in the Dextrain group (median [IQR] = 3[− 1–7.0], P = 0.06). Several secondary outcomes showed significantly larger changes in the Dextrain group: finger tracking precision (mean ± SD = 0.3 ± 0.3N vs − 0.1 ± 0.33N; P < 0.0018), independent finger movements (34.7 ± 25.1 ms vs 7.7 ± 18.5 ms, P = 0.02) and maximal finger tapping speed (8.4 ± 7.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.045). At follow-up, Dextrain group showed significantly greater improvement in Motor Activity Log (median/IQR = 0.7/0.2–0.8 vs 0.2/0.1–0.6, P = 0.05). Across both groups SICI increased in patients with greater BBT-change (Rho = 0.80, P = 0.006). Comparing Dextrain subgroups with maximal grip force higher/lower than median (61.2%), BBT-change was significantly larger in patients with low vs high grip force (7.5 ± 5.6 vs 2.9 ± 2.8; respectively, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Although immediate improvements in gross dexterity post-stroke did not significantly differ between Dextrain training and CT, our findings suggest that Dextrain enhances recovery of several dexterity components and reported hand-use, particularly when motor impairment is moderate (low initial grip force). Findings need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934073 (retrospectively registered) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9. BioMed Central 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10355015/ /pubmed/37464404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Térémetz, Maxime Hamdoun, Sonia Colle, Florence Gerardin, Eloïse Desvilles, Claire Carment, Loïc Charron, Sylvain Cuenca, Macarena Calvet, David Baron, Jean-Claude Turc, Guillaume Maier, Marc A. Rosso, Charlotte Mas, Jean-Louis Lindberg, Påvel G. Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title | Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teremetzmaxime efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hamdounsonia efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT colleflorence efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gerardineloise efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT desvillesclaire efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT carmentloic efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT charronsylvain efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cuencamacarena efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT calvetdavid efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baronjeanclaude efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT turcguillaume efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maiermarca efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rossocharlotte efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT masjeanlouis efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lindbergpavelg efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial |