Cargando…

Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke. METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Térémetz, Maxime, Hamdoun, Sonia, Colle, Florence, Gerardin, Eloïse, Desvilles, Claire, Carment, Loïc, Charron, Sylvain, Cuenca, Macarena, Calvet, David, Baron, Jean-Claude, Turc, Guillaume, Maier, Marc A., Rosso, Charlotte, Mas, Jean-Louis, Lindberg, Påvel G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9
_version_ 1785075049407971328
author Térémetz, Maxime
Hamdoun, Sonia
Colle, Florence
Gerardin, Eloïse
Desvilles, Claire
Carment, Loïc
Charron, Sylvain
Cuenca, Macarena
Calvet, David
Baron, Jean-Claude
Turc, Guillaume
Maier, Marc A.
Rosso, Charlotte
Mas, Jean-Louis
Lindberg, Påvel G.
author_facet Térémetz, Maxime
Hamdoun, Sonia
Colle, Florence
Gerardin, Eloïse
Desvilles, Claire
Carment, Loïc
Charron, Sylvain
Cuenca, Macarena
Calvet, David
Baron, Jean-Claude
Turc, Guillaume
Maier, Marc A.
Rosso, Charlotte
Mas, Jean-Louis
Lindberg, Påvel G.
author_sort Térémetz, Maxime
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke. METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-phase post-stroke patients with mild-to-moderate dexterity impairment (Box and Block Test (BBT) > 1) received 12 sessions of Dextrain or CT. Blinded measures were obtained before and after training and at 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was BBT-change (after–before training). Secondary outcomes included changes in motor impairments, activity limitations and dexterity components. Corticospinal excitability and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation. RESULTS: BBT-change after training did not differ between the Dextrain (N = 21) vs CT group (N = 21) (median [IQR] = 5[2–7] vs 4[2–7], respectively; P = 0.36). Gains in BBT were maintained at the 3-month post-training follow-up, with a non-significant trend for enhanced BBT-change in the Dextrain group (median [IQR] = 3[− 1–7.0], P = 0.06). Several secondary outcomes showed significantly larger changes in the Dextrain group: finger tracking precision (mean ± SD = 0.3 ± 0.3N vs − 0.1 ± 0.33N; P < 0.0018), independent finger movements (34.7 ± 25.1 ms vs 7.7 ± 18.5 ms, P = 0.02) and maximal finger tapping speed (8.4 ± 7.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.045). At follow-up, Dextrain group showed significantly greater improvement in Motor Activity Log (median/IQR = 0.7/0.2–0.8 vs 0.2/0.1–0.6, P = 0.05). Across both groups SICI increased in patients with greater BBT-change (Rho = 0.80, P = 0.006). Comparing Dextrain subgroups with maximal grip force higher/lower than median (61.2%), BBT-change was significantly larger in patients with low vs high grip force (7.5 ± 5.6 vs 2.9 ± 2.8; respectively, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Although immediate improvements in gross dexterity post-stroke did not significantly differ between Dextrain training and CT, our findings suggest that Dextrain enhances recovery of several dexterity components and reported hand-use, particularly when motor impairment is moderate (low initial grip force). Findings need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934073 (retrospectively registered) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10355015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103550152023-07-20 Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial Térémetz, Maxime Hamdoun, Sonia Colle, Florence Gerardin, Eloïse Desvilles, Claire Carment, Loïc Charron, Sylvain Cuenca, Macarena Calvet, David Baron, Jean-Claude Turc, Guillaume Maier, Marc A. Rosso, Charlotte Mas, Jean-Louis Lindberg, Påvel G. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke. METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-phase post-stroke patients with mild-to-moderate dexterity impairment (Box and Block Test (BBT) > 1) received 12 sessions of Dextrain or CT. Blinded measures were obtained before and after training and at 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was BBT-change (after–before training). Secondary outcomes included changes in motor impairments, activity limitations and dexterity components. Corticospinal excitability and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation. RESULTS: BBT-change after training did not differ between the Dextrain (N = 21) vs CT group (N = 21) (median [IQR] = 5[2–7] vs 4[2–7], respectively; P = 0.36). Gains in BBT were maintained at the 3-month post-training follow-up, with a non-significant trend for enhanced BBT-change in the Dextrain group (median [IQR] = 3[− 1–7.0], P = 0.06). Several secondary outcomes showed significantly larger changes in the Dextrain group: finger tracking precision (mean ± SD = 0.3 ± 0.3N vs − 0.1 ± 0.33N; P < 0.0018), independent finger movements (34.7 ± 25.1 ms vs 7.7 ± 18.5 ms, P = 0.02) and maximal finger tapping speed (8.4 ± 7.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.045). At follow-up, Dextrain group showed significantly greater improvement in Motor Activity Log (median/IQR = 0.7/0.2–0.8 vs 0.2/0.1–0.6, P = 0.05). Across both groups SICI increased in patients with greater BBT-change (Rho = 0.80, P = 0.006). Comparing Dextrain subgroups with maximal grip force higher/lower than median (61.2%), BBT-change was significantly larger in patients with low vs high grip force (7.5 ± 5.6 vs 2.9 ± 2.8; respectively, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Although immediate improvements in gross dexterity post-stroke did not significantly differ between Dextrain training and CT, our findings suggest that Dextrain enhances recovery of several dexterity components and reported hand-use, particularly when motor impairment is moderate (low initial grip force). Findings need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934073 (retrospectively registered) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9. BioMed Central 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10355015/ /pubmed/37464404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Térémetz, Maxime
Hamdoun, Sonia
Colle, Florence
Gerardin, Eloïse
Desvilles, Claire
Carment, Loïc
Charron, Sylvain
Cuenca, Macarena
Calvet, David
Baron, Jean-Claude
Turc, Guillaume
Maier, Marc A.
Rosso, Charlotte
Mas, Jean-Louis
Lindberg, Påvel G.
Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01213-9
work_keys_str_mv AT teremetzmaxime efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hamdounsonia efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT colleflorence efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gerardineloise efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT desvillesclaire efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT carmentloic efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT charronsylvain efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cuencamacarena efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT calvetdavid efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baronjeanclaude efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT turcguillaume efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maiermarca efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rossocharlotte efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT masjeanlouis efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lindbergpavelg efficacyofinteractivemanualdexteritytrainingafterstrokeapilotsingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial