Cargando…

Failure of diltiazem to prevent 1:1 conduction of atrial flutter: a case report

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction to the ventricles is a dangerous cardiac arrhythmia. Contemporary guidelines recommend atrioventricular nodal blocking agents should be co-administered with class 1C anti-arrhythmics, as prophylaxis against 1:1 flutter. No guidance is provided on the ty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiver, K. D., Martin, D. K., Quah, J., Lahiri, A., Ganesan, A. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-023-03947-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction to the ventricles is a dangerous cardiac arrhythmia. Contemporary guidelines recommend atrioventricular nodal blocking agents should be co-administered with class 1C anti-arrhythmics, as prophylaxis against 1:1 flutter. No guidance is provided on the type or strength of atrioventricular nodal blockade required, and in practice, these agents are frequently prescribed at low dose, or even omitted, due to their side effect profile. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62 year old Caucasian man with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treated with flecainide, presented with atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction to the ventricles and was cardioverted. Diltiazem was added to prevent this complication and he again presented with atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction to the ventricles, despite prophylaxis with coadministration of diltiazem. CONCLUSIONS: This case report demonstrates failure of diltiazem to prevent 1:1 flutter in a patient chronically treated with flecainide for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.