Cargando…

Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariappan, Ramamani, Kumar, Snehil, Raju, Krishnaprabhu, Daniel, Dolly, Nair, Sukesh Chandran, Subramani, Sathya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476432
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_849_22
_version_ 1785075121949507584
author Mariappan, Ramamani
Kumar, Snehil
Raju, Krishnaprabhu
Daniel, Dolly
Nair, Sukesh Chandran
Subramani, Sathya
author_facet Mariappan, Ramamani
Kumar, Snehil
Raju, Krishnaprabhu
Daniel, Dolly
Nair, Sukesh Chandran
Subramani, Sathya
author_sort Mariappan, Ramamani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the clot. This in vitro study compared the techniques of performing the EC-assisted EBP using 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe on clotting time (CT), clot retraction (CR) and haemolysis. METHODS: This in vitro study was performed in a haematology laboratory. Five consented adult healthy male volunteers donated blood. In the 5-ml syringe technique, blood was injected through an EC, and as it flowed out of the tip, it was collected at the beginning and the end of 1 min. With the 20-ml technique, blood was collected at the beginning and end of the first, second and third minute. The samples were tested for CT, CR and haemolysis by measuring the plasma-free haemoglobin (PFHb). RESULTS: Five injections were made using a 5-ml syringe, and another five with a 20-ml syringe. Injection time was shorter in the 5-ml technique (80.80 ± 5.89 vs. 272 ± 28.4 s, P < 0.0001). With the 20-ml technique, CT progressively increased (>15 min), whereas, with the 5-ml syringe, the CT was normal. Both techniques caused mild, insignificant haemolysis (PFHb >0.005 g/dl), without affecting the quality of CR. CONCLUSION: EC-assisted EBP using a 5-ml syringe technique shortens the injection time and deposits fresh blood quickly without affecting CT and CR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10355359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103553592023-07-20 Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study) Mariappan, Ramamani Kumar, Snehil Raju, Krishnaprabhu Daniel, Dolly Nair, Sukesh Chandran Subramani, Sathya Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the clot. This in vitro study compared the techniques of performing the EC-assisted EBP using 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe on clotting time (CT), clot retraction (CR) and haemolysis. METHODS: This in vitro study was performed in a haematology laboratory. Five consented adult healthy male volunteers donated blood. In the 5-ml syringe technique, blood was injected through an EC, and as it flowed out of the tip, it was collected at the beginning and the end of 1 min. With the 20-ml technique, blood was collected at the beginning and end of the first, second and third minute. The samples were tested for CT, CR and haemolysis by measuring the plasma-free haemoglobin (PFHb). RESULTS: Five injections were made using a 5-ml syringe, and another five with a 20-ml syringe. Injection time was shorter in the 5-ml technique (80.80 ± 5.89 vs. 272 ± 28.4 s, P < 0.0001). With the 20-ml technique, CT progressively increased (>15 min), whereas, with the 5-ml syringe, the CT was normal. Both techniques caused mild, insignificant haemolysis (PFHb >0.005 g/dl), without affecting the quality of CR. CONCLUSION: EC-assisted EBP using a 5-ml syringe technique shortens the injection time and deposits fresh blood quickly without affecting CT and CR. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-06 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10355359/ /pubmed/37476432 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_849_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mariappan, Ramamani
Kumar, Snehil
Raju, Krishnaprabhu
Daniel, Dolly
Nair, Sukesh Chandran
Subramani, Sathya
Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)
title Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)
title_full Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)
title_fullStr Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)
title_full_unstemmed Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)
title_short Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)
title_sort comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – a prospective in vitro study (ec-ebp study)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476432
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_849_22
work_keys_str_mv AT mariappanramamani comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy
AT kumarsnehil comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy
AT rajukrishnaprabhu comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy
AT danieldolly comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy
AT nairsukeshchandran comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy
AT subramanisathya comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy