Cargando…
Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476432 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_849_22 |
_version_ | 1785075121949507584 |
---|---|
author | Mariappan, Ramamani Kumar, Snehil Raju, Krishnaprabhu Daniel, Dolly Nair, Sukesh Chandran Subramani, Sathya |
author_facet | Mariappan, Ramamani Kumar, Snehil Raju, Krishnaprabhu Daniel, Dolly Nair, Sukesh Chandran Subramani, Sathya |
author_sort | Mariappan, Ramamani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the clot. This in vitro study compared the techniques of performing the EC-assisted EBP using 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe on clotting time (CT), clot retraction (CR) and haemolysis. METHODS: This in vitro study was performed in a haematology laboratory. Five consented adult healthy male volunteers donated blood. In the 5-ml syringe technique, blood was injected through an EC, and as it flowed out of the tip, it was collected at the beginning and the end of 1 min. With the 20-ml technique, blood was collected at the beginning and end of the first, second and third minute. The samples were tested for CT, CR and haemolysis by measuring the plasma-free haemoglobin (PFHb). RESULTS: Five injections were made using a 5-ml syringe, and another five with a 20-ml syringe. Injection time was shorter in the 5-ml technique (80.80 ± 5.89 vs. 272 ± 28.4 s, P < 0.0001). With the 20-ml technique, CT progressively increased (>15 min), whereas, with the 5-ml syringe, the CT was normal. Both techniques caused mild, insignificant haemolysis (PFHb >0.005 g/dl), without affecting the quality of CR. CONCLUSION: EC-assisted EBP using a 5-ml syringe technique shortens the injection time and deposits fresh blood quickly without affecting CT and CR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10355359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103553592023-07-20 Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study) Mariappan, Ramamani Kumar, Snehil Raju, Krishnaprabhu Daniel, Dolly Nair, Sukesh Chandran Subramani, Sathya Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the clot. This in vitro study compared the techniques of performing the EC-assisted EBP using 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe on clotting time (CT), clot retraction (CR) and haemolysis. METHODS: This in vitro study was performed in a haematology laboratory. Five consented adult healthy male volunteers donated blood. In the 5-ml syringe technique, blood was injected through an EC, and as it flowed out of the tip, it was collected at the beginning and the end of 1 min. With the 20-ml technique, blood was collected at the beginning and end of the first, second and third minute. The samples were tested for CT, CR and haemolysis by measuring the plasma-free haemoglobin (PFHb). RESULTS: Five injections were made using a 5-ml syringe, and another five with a 20-ml syringe. Injection time was shorter in the 5-ml technique (80.80 ± 5.89 vs. 272 ± 28.4 s, P < 0.0001). With the 20-ml technique, CT progressively increased (>15 min), whereas, with the 5-ml syringe, the CT was normal. Both techniques caused mild, insignificant haemolysis (PFHb >0.005 g/dl), without affecting the quality of CR. CONCLUSION: EC-assisted EBP using a 5-ml syringe technique shortens the injection time and deposits fresh blood quickly without affecting CT and CR. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-06 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10355359/ /pubmed/37476432 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_849_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mariappan, Ramamani Kumar, Snehil Raju, Krishnaprabhu Daniel, Dolly Nair, Sukesh Chandran Subramani, Sathya Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study) |
title | Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study) |
title_full | Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study) |
title_fullStr | Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study) |
title_short | Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study) |
title_sort | comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis – a prospective in vitro study (ec-ebp study) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476432 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_849_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mariappanramamani comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy AT kumarsnehil comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy AT rajukrishnaprabhu comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy AT danieldolly comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy AT nairsukeshchandran comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy AT subramanisathya comparingtwotechniquesofperforminganepiduralcatheterassistedepiduralbloodpatchusinga20mlsyringeversusa5mlsyringeanditseffectonclottingtimethestrengthofclotretractionandhaemolysisaprospectiveinvitrostudyecebpstudy |