Cargando…

Response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system

The objective of this study was to compare three-breed rotational crossbred calves sired by Holstein, Jersey, Montbéliarde, Normande, Viking Red, and Limousin bulls with Holstein’s calves fed a high milk allowance for growth, milk consumption, health scores, and profitability in an automated group f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arens, Sara C, Sharpe, Kirsten T, Schutz, Michael M, Heins, Bradley J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad063
_version_ 1785075156369014784
author Arens, Sara C
Sharpe, Kirsten T
Schutz, Michael M
Heins, Bradley J
author_facet Arens, Sara C
Sharpe, Kirsten T
Schutz, Michael M
Heins, Bradley J
author_sort Arens, Sara C
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to compare three-breed rotational crossbred calves sired by Holstein, Jersey, Montbéliarde, Normande, Viking Red, and Limousin bulls with Holstein’s calves fed a high milk allowance for growth, milk consumption, health scores, and profitability in an automated group feeding system. Breed groups were Holstein (n = 16), crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein (n = 24), crossbreds of Jersey, Normande, and Viking Red (n = 6), and Limousin crossbred beef × dairy (n = 45) calves. Calves were randomly assigned within the breed to one of two treatments from September 2019 to June 2020 at the University of Minnesota West Central Research and Outreach Center in Morris, MN. The five breed groups were balanced across the two treatment groups. Treatment groups were fed 8 L/d (8 L) or ad libitum (AL) milk allowance, and calves were introduced to the automated feeder at day 5 and were weaned at 56 d. Milk feeding behaviors (drinking speeds) were collected from the automatic feeding system and analyzed by feeding and breed groups. Body weights were recorded at birth and weekly through weaning. The health scores of calves were recorded twice per week. Variables included in the statistical model for analyses were fixed effects of birthweight, the season of birth, breed group, and treatment group. Calves fed AL had a greater weaning weight (P = 0.001; 106.4 kg vs. 91.4 kg) and greater (P = 0.001) average daily gain (ADG; 1.11 kg/d vs. 0.87 kg/d) than calves fed 8 L, respectively. The calves fed AL (1,064 mL/min) had a slower drinking speed (P = 0.01) than calves fed 8 L (1,467 mL/min). Most breed groups were not different for weaning weight or ADG across the 56 d. Daily milk consumption per calf was lower (P = 0.009) for Limousin crossbred calves compared with Holstein and crossbred dairy calves. As expected, AL calves had higher (P = 0.001) milk cost ($189.52) than the 8 L calves ($140.71). The average cost per kilogram of gain was similar for calves fed 8 L ($2.89/kg) compared to AL ($3.00/kg) calves. Overall, the Limousin crossbred calves had the least milk cost ($152.75) compared with Holstein ($175.67) calves and Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein crossbred calves ($177.13). The results from this study found that although feeding calves AL resulted in greater milk consumption and higher cost than 8 L calves, there may be an economic advantage with costs per kilogram of gain to feeding calves ad libitum if increased growth rates are realized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10355792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103557922023-07-20 Response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system Arens, Sara C Sharpe, Kirsten T Schutz, Michael M Heins, Bradley J Transl Anim Sci Housing and Management The objective of this study was to compare three-breed rotational crossbred calves sired by Holstein, Jersey, Montbéliarde, Normande, Viking Red, and Limousin bulls with Holstein’s calves fed a high milk allowance for growth, milk consumption, health scores, and profitability in an automated group feeding system. Breed groups were Holstein (n = 16), crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein (n = 24), crossbreds of Jersey, Normande, and Viking Red (n = 6), and Limousin crossbred beef × dairy (n = 45) calves. Calves were randomly assigned within the breed to one of two treatments from September 2019 to June 2020 at the University of Minnesota West Central Research and Outreach Center in Morris, MN. The five breed groups were balanced across the two treatment groups. Treatment groups were fed 8 L/d (8 L) or ad libitum (AL) milk allowance, and calves were introduced to the automated feeder at day 5 and were weaned at 56 d. Milk feeding behaviors (drinking speeds) were collected from the automatic feeding system and analyzed by feeding and breed groups. Body weights were recorded at birth and weekly through weaning. The health scores of calves were recorded twice per week. Variables included in the statistical model for analyses were fixed effects of birthweight, the season of birth, breed group, and treatment group. Calves fed AL had a greater weaning weight (P = 0.001; 106.4 kg vs. 91.4 kg) and greater (P = 0.001) average daily gain (ADG; 1.11 kg/d vs. 0.87 kg/d) than calves fed 8 L, respectively. The calves fed AL (1,064 mL/min) had a slower drinking speed (P = 0.01) than calves fed 8 L (1,467 mL/min). Most breed groups were not different for weaning weight or ADG across the 56 d. Daily milk consumption per calf was lower (P = 0.009) for Limousin crossbred calves compared with Holstein and crossbred dairy calves. As expected, AL calves had higher (P = 0.001) milk cost ($189.52) than the 8 L calves ($140.71). The average cost per kilogram of gain was similar for calves fed 8 L ($2.89/kg) compared to AL ($3.00/kg) calves. Overall, the Limousin crossbred calves had the least milk cost ($152.75) compared with Holstein ($175.67) calves and Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein crossbred calves ($177.13). The results from this study found that although feeding calves AL resulted in greater milk consumption and higher cost than 8 L calves, there may be an economic advantage with costs per kilogram of gain to feeding calves ad libitum if increased growth rates are realized. Oxford University Press 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10355792/ /pubmed/37476418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad063 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Housing and Management
Arens, Sara C
Sharpe, Kirsten T
Schutz, Michael M
Heins, Bradley J
Response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system
title Response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system
title_full Response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system
title_fullStr Response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system
title_full_unstemmed Response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system
title_short Response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system
title_sort response to ad libitum milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy–beef calves in an automated feeding system
topic Housing and Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad063
work_keys_str_mv AT arenssarac responsetoadlibitummilkallowancebycrossbreddairyanddairybeefcalvesinanautomatedfeedingsystem
AT sharpekirstent responsetoadlibitummilkallowancebycrossbreddairyanddairybeefcalvesinanautomatedfeedingsystem
AT schutzmichaelm responsetoadlibitummilkallowancebycrossbreddairyanddairybeefcalvesinanautomatedfeedingsystem
AT heinsbradleyj responsetoadlibitummilkallowancebycrossbreddairyanddairybeefcalvesinanautomatedfeedingsystem