Cargando…

Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?

BACKGROUND: Patients with a tibial shaft fracture experiencing their first postoperative complication following treatment with intramedullary nails may be at greater risk of subsequent complications than the whole population. We aimed to determine whether the initial method of nail insertion influen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schemitsch, Emil H., Kumar, Ashesh, Heels-Ansdell, Diane, Sprague, Sheila, Bhandari, Mohit, Guyatt, Gordon, Sanders, David W., Swiontkowski, Marc, Tornetta, Paul, Walter, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37442585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012222
_version_ 1785075170249015296
author Schemitsch, Emil H.
Kumar, Ashesh
Heels-Ansdell, Diane
Sprague, Sheila
Bhandari, Mohit
Guyatt, Gordon
Sanders, David W.
Swiontkowski, Marc
Tornetta, Paul
Walter, Stephen
author_facet Schemitsch, Emil H.
Kumar, Ashesh
Heels-Ansdell, Diane
Sprague, Sheila
Bhandari, Mohit
Guyatt, Gordon
Sanders, David W.
Swiontkowski, Marc
Tornetta, Paul
Walter, Stephen
author_sort Schemitsch, Emil H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with a tibial shaft fracture experiencing their first postoperative complication following treatment with intramedullary nails may be at greater risk of subsequent complications than the whole population. We aimed to determine whether the initial method of nail insertion influences outcome in patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring multiple reoperations. METHODS: Using the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures trial data, we categorized patients as those not requiring reoperation, those requiring a single reoperation and those requiring multiple reoperations, and we compared them by nail insertion technique (reamed v. unreamed) and fracture type (open v. closed). We then determined the number of patients whose first reoperation was in response to infection, and we compared other clinical outcomes between the reamed and unreamed groups. RESULTS: Among 1226 patients included in this analysis, 175 (14.27%) experienced a single reoperation and 44 patients (3.59%) underwent multiple reoperations. Nail insertion techniques (reamed v. unreamed) did not play a role in the need to perform multiple reoperations. Seventy-five percent of patients requiring multiple reoperations had open tibial shaft fractures. An equal number of these were reamed and unreamed insertions. The majority of patients had their course complicated by infection and almost 50% of patients whose first reoperation was for infection required more than 2 reoperations for management. The rest required multiple procedures for nonunion or bone loss. CONCLUSION: Our findings corroborate those of other studies, in which open fracture type rather than nail insertion technique was found to be the cause of morbidity following intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00038129
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10355994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103559942023-07-20 Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations? Schemitsch, Emil H. Kumar, Ashesh Heels-Ansdell, Diane Sprague, Sheila Bhandari, Mohit Guyatt, Gordon Sanders, David W. Swiontkowski, Marc Tornetta, Paul Walter, Stephen Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: Patients with a tibial shaft fracture experiencing their first postoperative complication following treatment with intramedullary nails may be at greater risk of subsequent complications than the whole population. We aimed to determine whether the initial method of nail insertion influences outcome in patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring multiple reoperations. METHODS: Using the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures trial data, we categorized patients as those not requiring reoperation, those requiring a single reoperation and those requiring multiple reoperations, and we compared them by nail insertion technique (reamed v. unreamed) and fracture type (open v. closed). We then determined the number of patients whose first reoperation was in response to infection, and we compared other clinical outcomes between the reamed and unreamed groups. RESULTS: Among 1226 patients included in this analysis, 175 (14.27%) experienced a single reoperation and 44 patients (3.59%) underwent multiple reoperations. Nail insertion techniques (reamed v. unreamed) did not play a role in the need to perform multiple reoperations. Seventy-five percent of patients requiring multiple reoperations had open tibial shaft fractures. An equal number of these were reamed and unreamed insertions. The majority of patients had their course complicated by infection and almost 50% of patients whose first reoperation was for infection required more than 2 reoperations for management. The rest required multiple procedures for nonunion or bone loss. CONCLUSION: Our findings corroborate those of other studies, in which open fracture type rather than nail insertion technique was found to be the cause of morbidity following intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00038129 CMA Impact Inc. 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10355994/ /pubmed/37442585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012222 Text en © 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use) and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Schemitsch, Emil H.
Kumar, Ashesh
Heels-Ansdell, Diane
Sprague, Sheila
Bhandari, Mohit
Guyatt, Gordon
Sanders, David W.
Swiontkowski, Marc
Tornetta, Paul
Walter, Stephen
Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
title Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
title_full Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
title_fullStr Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
title_full_unstemmed Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
title_short Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
title_sort reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37442585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012222
work_keys_str_mv AT schemitschemilh reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT kumarashesh reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT heelsansdelldiane reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT spraguesheila reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT bhandarimohit reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT guyattgordon reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT sandersdavidw reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT swiontkowskimarc reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT tornettapaul reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations
AT walterstephen reamedcomparedwithunreamednailingoftibialshaftfracturesdoestheinitialmethodofnailinsertioninfluenceoutcomeinpatientsrequiringreoperations