Cargando…

The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity and specificity are characteristics of a diagnostic test and are not expected to change as the prevalence of the target condition changes. We sought to evaluate the association between prevalence and changes in sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: We retrieved data from meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murad, M. Hassan, Lin, Lifeng, Chu, Haitao, Hasan, Bashar, Alsibai, Reem A., Abbas, Alzhraa S., Mustafa, Reem A., Wang, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37460126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.221802
_version_ 1785075175081902080
author Murad, M. Hassan
Lin, Lifeng
Chu, Haitao
Hasan, Bashar
Alsibai, Reem A.
Abbas, Alzhraa S.
Mustafa, Reem A.
Wang, Zhen
author_facet Murad, M. Hassan
Lin, Lifeng
Chu, Haitao
Hasan, Bashar
Alsibai, Reem A.
Abbas, Alzhraa S.
Mustafa, Reem A.
Wang, Zhen
author_sort Murad, M. Hassan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sensitivity and specificity are characteristics of a diagnostic test and are not expected to change as the prevalence of the target condition changes. We sought to evaluate the association between prevalence and changes in sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: We retrieved data from meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2003–2020). We used mixed-effects random-intercept linear regression models to evaluate the association between prevalence and logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity. The model evaluated all meta-analyses as nested within each systematic review. RESULTS: We analyzed 6909 diagnostic test accuracy studies from 552 meta-analyses that were included in 92 systematic reviews. For sensitivity, compared with the lowest quartile of prevalence, the second, third and fourth quartiles were associated with significantly higher odds of identifying a true positive case (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.26; OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23–1.41; OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37–1.58; respectively). For specificity, compared with the lowest quartile of prevalence, the second, third and fourth quartiles were associated with significantly lower odds of identifying a true negative case (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69–0.80; OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60–0.70; OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.44–0.51; respectively). Pooled regression coefficients from bivariate models conducted within each meta-analysis showed that prevalence was positively associated with sensitivity and negatively associated with specificity. Findings were consistent across subgroups. INTERPRETATION: In this large sample of diagnostic studies, higher prevalence was associated with higher estimated sensitivity and lower estimated specificity. Clinicians should consider the implications of disease prevalence and spectrum when interpreting the results from studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10356012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103560122023-07-20 The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy Murad, M. Hassan Lin, Lifeng Chu, Haitao Hasan, Bashar Alsibai, Reem A. Abbas, Alzhraa S. Mustafa, Reem A. Wang, Zhen CMAJ Research BACKGROUND: Sensitivity and specificity are characteristics of a diagnostic test and are not expected to change as the prevalence of the target condition changes. We sought to evaluate the association between prevalence and changes in sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: We retrieved data from meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2003–2020). We used mixed-effects random-intercept linear regression models to evaluate the association between prevalence and logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity. The model evaluated all meta-analyses as nested within each systematic review. RESULTS: We analyzed 6909 diagnostic test accuracy studies from 552 meta-analyses that were included in 92 systematic reviews. For sensitivity, compared with the lowest quartile of prevalence, the second, third and fourth quartiles were associated with significantly higher odds of identifying a true positive case (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.26; OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23–1.41; OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37–1.58; respectively). For specificity, compared with the lowest quartile of prevalence, the second, third and fourth quartiles were associated with significantly lower odds of identifying a true negative case (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69–0.80; OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60–0.70; OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.44–0.51; respectively). Pooled regression coefficients from bivariate models conducted within each meta-analysis showed that prevalence was positively associated with sensitivity and negatively associated with specificity. Findings were consistent across subgroups. INTERPRETATION: In this large sample of diagnostic studies, higher prevalence was associated with higher estimated sensitivity and lower estimated specificity. Clinicians should consider the implications of disease prevalence and spectrum when interpreting the results from studies of diagnostic test accuracy. CMA Impact Inc. 2023-07-17 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10356012/ /pubmed/37460126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.221802 Text en © 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Murad, M. Hassan
Lin, Lifeng
Chu, Haitao
Hasan, Bashar
Alsibai, Reem A.
Abbas, Alzhraa S.
Mustafa, Reem A.
Wang, Zhen
The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy
title The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy
title_fullStr The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full_unstemmed The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy
title_short The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy
title_sort association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37460126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.221802
work_keys_str_mv AT muradmhassan theassociationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT linlifeng theassociationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT chuhaitao theassociationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT hasanbashar theassociationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT alsibaireema theassociationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT abbasalzhraas theassociationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT mustafareema theassociationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT wangzhen theassociationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT muradmhassan associationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT linlifeng associationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT chuhaitao associationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT hasanbashar associationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT alsibaireema associationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT abbasalzhraas associationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT mustafareema associationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT wangzhen associationofsensitivityandspecificitywithdiseaseprevalenceanalysisof6909studiesofdiagnostictestaccuracy