Cargando…

The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates

BACKGROUND: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates. This also matters for drug development. The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) is engaged to define actionable reference ranges of commonly used laboratory values in neonates. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allegaert, Karel, Hildebrand, Heidrun, Singh, Kanwaljit, Turner, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02385-1
_version_ 1785075311321284608
author Allegaert, Karel
Hildebrand, Heidrun
Singh, Kanwaljit
Turner, Mark A.
author_facet Allegaert, Karel
Hildebrand, Heidrun
Singh, Kanwaljit
Turner, Mark A.
author_sort Allegaert, Karel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates. This also matters for drug development. The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) is engaged to define actionable reference ranges of commonly used laboratory values in neonates. METHODS: A structured literature search was performed to identify standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in neonates. Using a modified Delphi approach, an assessment and data extraction instrument to screen on completeness of information was developed. RESULTS: On 2908 hits, 281 papers were retained for full reading and 257 for data extraction. None of the papers reported a publication standard. Using the extraction instrument, most papers presented single country or unit findings. The median number of neonates was 120, with uncertainty on single or repeated measurements. Clinically meaningful information on age, sex, and medical conditions was commonly provided. Information on pharmacotherapy, equipment, analytical method, or laboratory location was rarely mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete. This undermines efforts to compare treatments, safety monitoring, or clinical management. Furthermore, there appears to be no standard yet to report laboratory values in neonates. IMPACT: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates, leading to a significant knowledge gap, also for safety reporting and drug development in neonates. We performed a literature search to identify standards or recommendations for publications on neonatal laboratory data and to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies involving neonates. Standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data were not identified, while published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10356592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103565922023-07-21 The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates Allegaert, Karel Hildebrand, Heidrun Singh, Kanwaljit Turner, Mark A. Pediatr Res Special Article BACKGROUND: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates. This also matters for drug development. The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) is engaged to define actionable reference ranges of commonly used laboratory values in neonates. METHODS: A structured literature search was performed to identify standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in neonates. Using a modified Delphi approach, an assessment and data extraction instrument to screen on completeness of information was developed. RESULTS: On 2908 hits, 281 papers were retained for full reading and 257 for data extraction. None of the papers reported a publication standard. Using the extraction instrument, most papers presented single country or unit findings. The median number of neonates was 120, with uncertainty on single or repeated measurements. Clinically meaningful information on age, sex, and medical conditions was commonly provided. Information on pharmacotherapy, equipment, analytical method, or laboratory location was rarely mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete. This undermines efforts to compare treatments, safety monitoring, or clinical management. Furthermore, there appears to be no standard yet to report laboratory values in neonates. IMPACT: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates, leading to a significant knowledge gap, also for safety reporting and drug development in neonates. We performed a literature search to identify standards or recommendations for publications on neonatal laboratory data and to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies involving neonates. Standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data were not identified, while published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete. Nature Publishing Group US 2022-12-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10356592/ /pubmed/36550353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02385-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Special Article
Allegaert, Karel
Hildebrand, Heidrun
Singh, Kanwaljit
Turner, Mark A.
The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates
title The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates
title_full The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates
title_fullStr The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates
title_full_unstemmed The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates
title_short The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates
title_sort publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates
topic Special Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02385-1
work_keys_str_mv AT allegaertkarel thepublicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates
AT hildebrandheidrun thepublicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates
AT singhkanwaljit thepublicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates
AT turnermarka thepublicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates
AT allegaertkarel publicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates
AT hildebrandheidrun publicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates
AT singhkanwaljit publicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates
AT turnermarka publicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates