Cargando…
The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates
BACKGROUND: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates. This also matters for drug development. The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) is engaged to define actionable reference ranges of commonly used laboratory values in neonates. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02385-1 |
_version_ | 1785075311321284608 |
---|---|
author | Allegaert, Karel Hildebrand, Heidrun Singh, Kanwaljit Turner, Mark A. |
author_facet | Allegaert, Karel Hildebrand, Heidrun Singh, Kanwaljit Turner, Mark A. |
author_sort | Allegaert, Karel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates. This also matters for drug development. The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) is engaged to define actionable reference ranges of commonly used laboratory values in neonates. METHODS: A structured literature search was performed to identify standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in neonates. Using a modified Delphi approach, an assessment and data extraction instrument to screen on completeness of information was developed. RESULTS: On 2908 hits, 281 papers were retained for full reading and 257 for data extraction. None of the papers reported a publication standard. Using the extraction instrument, most papers presented single country or unit findings. The median number of neonates was 120, with uncertainty on single or repeated measurements. Clinically meaningful information on age, sex, and medical conditions was commonly provided. Information on pharmacotherapy, equipment, analytical method, or laboratory location was rarely mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete. This undermines efforts to compare treatments, safety monitoring, or clinical management. Furthermore, there appears to be no standard yet to report laboratory values in neonates. IMPACT: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates, leading to a significant knowledge gap, also for safety reporting and drug development in neonates. We performed a literature search to identify standards or recommendations for publications on neonatal laboratory data and to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies involving neonates. Standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data were not identified, while published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10356592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103565922023-07-21 The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates Allegaert, Karel Hildebrand, Heidrun Singh, Kanwaljit Turner, Mark A. Pediatr Res Special Article BACKGROUND: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates. This also matters for drug development. The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) is engaged to define actionable reference ranges of commonly used laboratory values in neonates. METHODS: A structured literature search was performed to identify standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in neonates. Using a modified Delphi approach, an assessment and data extraction instrument to screen on completeness of information was developed. RESULTS: On 2908 hits, 281 papers were retained for full reading and 257 for data extraction. None of the papers reported a publication standard. Using the extraction instrument, most papers presented single country or unit findings. The median number of neonates was 120, with uncertainty on single or repeated measurements. Clinically meaningful information on age, sex, and medical conditions was commonly provided. Information on pharmacotherapy, equipment, analytical method, or laboratory location was rarely mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete. This undermines efforts to compare treatments, safety monitoring, or clinical management. Furthermore, there appears to be no standard yet to report laboratory values in neonates. IMPACT: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates, leading to a significant knowledge gap, also for safety reporting and drug development in neonates. We performed a literature search to identify standards or recommendations for publications on neonatal laboratory data and to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies involving neonates. Standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data were not identified, while published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete. Nature Publishing Group US 2022-12-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10356592/ /pubmed/36550353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02385-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Special Article Allegaert, Karel Hildebrand, Heidrun Singh, Kanwaljit Turner, Mark A. The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates |
title | The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates |
title_full | The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates |
title_fullStr | The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates |
title_full_unstemmed | The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates |
title_short | The publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates |
title_sort | publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies in neonates |
topic | Special Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02385-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allegaertkarel thepublicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates AT hildebrandheidrun thepublicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates AT singhkanwaljit thepublicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates AT turnermarka thepublicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates AT allegaertkarel publicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates AT hildebrandheidrun publicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates AT singhkanwaljit publicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates AT turnermarka publicationqualityoflaboratoryvaluesinclinicalstudiesinneonates |