Cargando…

The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo

Candidate ionising radiation exposure biomarkers must be validated in humans exposed in vivo. Blood from patients undergoing positron emission tomography–computed tomography scan (PET-CT) and skeletal scintigraphy (scintigraphy) was drawn before (0 h) and after (2 h) the procedure for correlation an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-Riego, Milagrosa, Płódowska, Magdalena, Lis-Zajęcka, Milena, Jeziorska, Kamila, Tetela, Sylwia, Węgierek-Ciuk, Aneta, Sobota, Daniel, Braziewicz, Janusz, Lundholm, Lovisa, Lisowska, Halina, Wojcik, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37335333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-023-01033-4
_version_ 1785075331261005824
author López-Riego, Milagrosa
Płódowska, Magdalena
Lis-Zajęcka, Milena
Jeziorska, Kamila
Tetela, Sylwia
Węgierek-Ciuk, Aneta
Sobota, Daniel
Braziewicz, Janusz
Lundholm, Lovisa
Lisowska, Halina
Wojcik, Andrzej
author_facet López-Riego, Milagrosa
Płódowska, Magdalena
Lis-Zajęcka, Milena
Jeziorska, Kamila
Tetela, Sylwia
Węgierek-Ciuk, Aneta
Sobota, Daniel
Braziewicz, Janusz
Lundholm, Lovisa
Lisowska, Halina
Wojcik, Andrzej
author_sort López-Riego, Milagrosa
collection PubMed
description Candidate ionising radiation exposure biomarkers must be validated in humans exposed in vivo. Blood from patients undergoing positron emission tomography–computed tomography scan (PET-CT) and skeletal scintigraphy (scintigraphy) was drawn before (0 h) and after (2 h) the procedure for correlation analyses of the response of selected biomarkers with radiation dose and other available patient information. FDXR, CDKN1A, BBC3, GADD45A, XPC, and MDM2 expression was determined by qRT-PCR, DNA damage (γH2AX) by flow cytometry, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels by flow cytometry using the 2′, 7′—dichlorofluorescein diacetate test in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). For ROS experiments, 0- and 2-h samples were additionally exposed to UVA to determine whether diagnostic irradiation conditioned the response to further oxidative insult. With some exceptions, radiological imaging induced weak γH2AX foci, ROS and gene expression fold changes, the latter with good coherence across genes within a patient. Diagnostic imaging did not influence oxidative stress in PBMC successively exposed to UVA. Correlation analyses with patient characteristics led to low correlation coefficient values. γH2AX fold change, which correlated positively with gene expression, presented a weak positive correlation with injected activity, indicating a radiation-induced subtle increase in DNA damage and subsequent activation of the DNA damage response pathway. The exposure discrimination potential of these biomarkers in the absence of control samples as frequently demanded in radiological emergencies, was assessed using raw data. These results suggest that the variability of the response in heterogeneous populations might complicate identifying individuals exposed to low radiation doses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00411-023-01033-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10356679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103566792023-07-21 The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo López-Riego, Milagrosa Płódowska, Magdalena Lis-Zajęcka, Milena Jeziorska, Kamila Tetela, Sylwia Węgierek-Ciuk, Aneta Sobota, Daniel Braziewicz, Janusz Lundholm, Lovisa Lisowska, Halina Wojcik, Andrzej Radiat Environ Biophys Original Article Candidate ionising radiation exposure biomarkers must be validated in humans exposed in vivo. Blood from patients undergoing positron emission tomography–computed tomography scan (PET-CT) and skeletal scintigraphy (scintigraphy) was drawn before (0 h) and after (2 h) the procedure for correlation analyses of the response of selected biomarkers with radiation dose and other available patient information. FDXR, CDKN1A, BBC3, GADD45A, XPC, and MDM2 expression was determined by qRT-PCR, DNA damage (γH2AX) by flow cytometry, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels by flow cytometry using the 2′, 7′—dichlorofluorescein diacetate test in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). For ROS experiments, 0- and 2-h samples were additionally exposed to UVA to determine whether diagnostic irradiation conditioned the response to further oxidative insult. With some exceptions, radiological imaging induced weak γH2AX foci, ROS and gene expression fold changes, the latter with good coherence across genes within a patient. Diagnostic imaging did not influence oxidative stress in PBMC successively exposed to UVA. Correlation analyses with patient characteristics led to low correlation coefficient values. γH2AX fold change, which correlated positively with gene expression, presented a weak positive correlation with injected activity, indicating a radiation-induced subtle increase in DNA damage and subsequent activation of the DNA damage response pathway. The exposure discrimination potential of these biomarkers in the absence of control samples as frequently demanded in radiological emergencies, was assessed using raw data. These results suggest that the variability of the response in heterogeneous populations might complicate identifying individuals exposed to low radiation doses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00411-023-01033-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10356679/ /pubmed/37335333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-023-01033-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
López-Riego, Milagrosa
Płódowska, Magdalena
Lis-Zajęcka, Milena
Jeziorska, Kamila
Tetela, Sylwia
Węgierek-Ciuk, Aneta
Sobota, Daniel
Braziewicz, Janusz
Lundholm, Lovisa
Lisowska, Halina
Wojcik, Andrzej
The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo
title The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo
title_full The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo
title_fullStr The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo
title_full_unstemmed The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo
title_short The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo
title_sort dna damage response to radiological imaging: from ros and γh2ax foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37335333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-023-01033-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezriegomilagrosa thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT płodowskamagdalena thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT liszajeckamilena thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT jeziorskakamila thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT tetelasylwia thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT wegierekciukaneta thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT sobotadaniel thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT braziewiczjanusz thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT lundholmlovisa thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT lisowskahalina thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT wojcikandrzej thednadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT lopezriegomilagrosa dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT płodowskamagdalena dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT liszajeckamilena dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT jeziorskakamila dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT tetelasylwia dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT wegierekciukaneta dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT sobotadaniel dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT braziewiczjanusz dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT lundholmlovisa dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT lisowskahalina dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo
AT wojcikandrzej dnadamageresponsetoradiologicalimagingfromrosandgh2axfociinductiontogeneexpressionresponsesinvivo