Cargando…

Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the criterion validity and responsiveness of the self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ) to monitor aerobic capacity in cancer survivors. METHODS: Cancer survivors participating in a 10-week sup...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weemaes, Anouk T.R., Meijer, Renske, Beelen, Milou, van Hooff, Martijn, Weijenberg, Matty P., Lenssen, Antoine F., van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V., Savelberg, Hans H.C.M., Schep, Goof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37466784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00613-8
_version_ 1785075338694361088
author Weemaes, Anouk T.R.
Meijer, Renske
Beelen, Milou
van Hooff, Martijn
Weijenberg, Matty P.
Lenssen, Antoine F.
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.
Savelberg, Hans H.C.M.
Schep, Goof
author_facet Weemaes, Anouk T.R.
Meijer, Renske
Beelen, Milou
van Hooff, Martijn
Weijenberg, Matty P.
Lenssen, Antoine F.
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.
Savelberg, Hans H.C.M.
Schep, Goof
author_sort Weemaes, Anouk T.R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluating the criterion validity and responsiveness of the self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ) to monitor aerobic capacity in cancer survivors. METHODS: Cancer survivors participating in a 10-week supervised exercise program were included. The FitMáx©-questionnaire, DASI, VSAQ and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were completed before (T(0)) and after (T(1)) the program. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated between VO(2peak) estimated by the questionnaires (questionnaire-VO(2peak)) and VO(2peak) measured during CPET (CPET-VO(2peak)), at T(0) to examine criterion validity, and between changes in questionnaire-VO(2peak) and CPET-VO(2peak) (ΔT(0)-T(1)) to determine responsiveness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to examine the ability of the questionnaires to detect true improvements (≥ 6%) in CPET-VO(2peak). RESULTS: Seventy participants were included. Outcomes at T(1) were available for 58 participants (83%). Mean CPET-VO(2peak) significantly improved at T(1) (Δ1.6 mL·kg(− 1)·min(− 1) or 8%). Agreement between questionnaire-VO(2peak) and CPET-VO(2peak) at T(0) was moderate for the FitMáx©-questionnaire (ICC = 0.69) and VSAQ (ICC = 0.53), and poor for DASI (ICC = 0.36). Poor agreement was found between ΔCPET-VO(2peak) and Δquestionnaire-VO(2peak) for all questionnaires (ICC 0.43, 0.19 and 0.18 for the FitMáx©-questionnaire, VSAQ and DASI, respectively). ROC analysis showed that the FitMáx©-questionnaire was able to detect improvements in CPET-VO(2peak) (area under the curve, AUC = 0.77), when using a cut-off value of 1.0 mL·kg(− 1)·min(− 1), while VSAQ (AUC = 0.66) and DASI (AUC = 0.64) could not. CONCLUSION: The self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire has sufficient validity to estimate aerobic capacity in cancer survivors at group level. The responsiveness of the FitMáx©-questionnaire for absolute change is limited, but the questionnaire is able to detect whether aerobic capacity improved. The FitMáx©-questionnaire showed substantial better values of validity and responsiveness compared to DASI and VSAQ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10356721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103567212023-07-21 Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness Weemaes, Anouk T.R. Meijer, Renske Beelen, Milou van Hooff, Martijn Weijenberg, Matty P. Lenssen, Antoine F. van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. Savelberg, Hans H.C.M. Schep, Goof J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Evaluating the criterion validity and responsiveness of the self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ) to monitor aerobic capacity in cancer survivors. METHODS: Cancer survivors participating in a 10-week supervised exercise program were included. The FitMáx©-questionnaire, DASI, VSAQ and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were completed before (T(0)) and after (T(1)) the program. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated between VO(2peak) estimated by the questionnaires (questionnaire-VO(2peak)) and VO(2peak) measured during CPET (CPET-VO(2peak)), at T(0) to examine criterion validity, and between changes in questionnaire-VO(2peak) and CPET-VO(2peak) (ΔT(0)-T(1)) to determine responsiveness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to examine the ability of the questionnaires to detect true improvements (≥ 6%) in CPET-VO(2peak). RESULTS: Seventy participants were included. Outcomes at T(1) were available for 58 participants (83%). Mean CPET-VO(2peak) significantly improved at T(1) (Δ1.6 mL·kg(− 1)·min(− 1) or 8%). Agreement between questionnaire-VO(2peak) and CPET-VO(2peak) at T(0) was moderate for the FitMáx©-questionnaire (ICC = 0.69) and VSAQ (ICC = 0.53), and poor for DASI (ICC = 0.36). Poor agreement was found between ΔCPET-VO(2peak) and Δquestionnaire-VO(2peak) for all questionnaires (ICC 0.43, 0.19 and 0.18 for the FitMáx©-questionnaire, VSAQ and DASI, respectively). ROC analysis showed that the FitMáx©-questionnaire was able to detect improvements in CPET-VO(2peak) (area under the curve, AUC = 0.77), when using a cut-off value of 1.0 mL·kg(− 1)·min(− 1), while VSAQ (AUC = 0.66) and DASI (AUC = 0.64) could not. CONCLUSION: The self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire has sufficient validity to estimate aerobic capacity in cancer survivors at group level. The responsiveness of the FitMáx©-questionnaire for absolute change is limited, but the questionnaire is able to detect whether aerobic capacity improved. The FitMáx©-questionnaire showed substantial better values of validity and responsiveness compared to DASI and VSAQ. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10356721/ /pubmed/37466784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00613-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Weemaes, Anouk T.R.
Meijer, Renske
Beelen, Milou
van Hooff, Martijn
Weijenberg, Matty P.
Lenssen, Antoine F.
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.
Savelberg, Hans H.C.M.
Schep, Goof
Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness
title Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness
title_full Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness
title_fullStr Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness
title_short Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness
title_sort monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37466784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00613-8
work_keys_str_mv AT weemaesanouktr monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness
AT meijerrenske monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness
AT beelenmilou monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness
AT vanhooffmartijn monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness
AT weijenbergmattyp monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness
AT lenssenantoinef monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness
AT vandepollfranselonnekev monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness
AT savelberghanshcm monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness
AT schepgoof monitoringaerobiccapacityincancersurvivorsusingselfreportedquestionnairescriterionvalidityandresponsiveness