Cargando…
Systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies
PURPOSE: Mistletoe treatment is discussed controversial as a complementary treatment for cancer patients. Aim of this systematic analysis is to assess the concept of mistletoe treatment in the clinical studies with respect to indication, type of mistletoe preparation, treatment schedule, aim of trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36481925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04511-2 |
_version_ | 1785075376845750272 |
---|---|
author | Staupe, Henrike Buentzel, Judith Keinki, Christian Buentzel, Jens Huebner, Jutta |
author_facet | Staupe, Henrike Buentzel, Judith Keinki, Christian Buentzel, Jens Huebner, Jutta |
author_sort | Staupe, Henrike |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Mistletoe treatment is discussed controversial as a complementary treatment for cancer patients. Aim of this systematic analysis is to assess the concept of mistletoe treatment in the clinical studies with respect to indication, type of mistletoe preparation, treatment schedule, aim of treatment, and assessment of treatment results. METHODS: In the period from August to December 2020, the following databases were systematically searched: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, CINAHL, and “Science Citation Index Expanded” (Web of Science). We assessed all studies for study types, methods, endpoints and mistletoe preparations including their ways of application, host trees and dosage schedules. RESULTS: The search concerning mistletoe therapy revealed 3296 hits. Of these, 102 publications and at total of 19.441 patients were included. We included several study types investigating the application of mistletoe in different groups of participants (cancer patients of any type of cancer were included as well as studies conducted with healthy volunteers and pediatric patients). The most common types of cancer were breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer and malignant melanoma. Randomized controlled studies, cohort studies and case reports make up most of the included studies. A huge variety was observed concerning type and composition of mistletoe extracts (differing pharmaceutical companies and host trees), ways of applications and dosage schedules. Administration varied e. g. between using mistletoe extract as sole treatment and as concomitant therapy to cancer treatment. As the analysis of all studies shows, there is no relationship between mistletoe preparation used, host tree and dosage, and cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Our research was not able to deviate transparent rules or guidelines with respect to mistletoe treatment in cancer care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04511-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10356894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103568942023-07-21 Systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies Staupe, Henrike Buentzel, Judith Keinki, Christian Buentzel, Jens Huebner, Jutta J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: Mistletoe treatment is discussed controversial as a complementary treatment for cancer patients. Aim of this systematic analysis is to assess the concept of mistletoe treatment in the clinical studies with respect to indication, type of mistletoe preparation, treatment schedule, aim of treatment, and assessment of treatment results. METHODS: In the period from August to December 2020, the following databases were systematically searched: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, CINAHL, and “Science Citation Index Expanded” (Web of Science). We assessed all studies for study types, methods, endpoints and mistletoe preparations including their ways of application, host trees and dosage schedules. RESULTS: The search concerning mistletoe therapy revealed 3296 hits. Of these, 102 publications and at total of 19.441 patients were included. We included several study types investigating the application of mistletoe in different groups of participants (cancer patients of any type of cancer were included as well as studies conducted with healthy volunteers and pediatric patients). The most common types of cancer were breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer and malignant melanoma. Randomized controlled studies, cohort studies and case reports make up most of the included studies. A huge variety was observed concerning type and composition of mistletoe extracts (differing pharmaceutical companies and host trees), ways of applications and dosage schedules. Administration varied e. g. between using mistletoe extract as sole treatment and as concomitant therapy to cancer treatment. As the analysis of all studies shows, there is no relationship between mistletoe preparation used, host tree and dosage, and cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Our research was not able to deviate transparent rules or guidelines with respect to mistletoe treatment in cancer care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04511-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10356894/ /pubmed/36481925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04511-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Staupe, Henrike Buentzel, Judith Keinki, Christian Buentzel, Jens Huebner, Jutta Systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies |
title | Systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies |
title_full | Systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies |
title_fullStr | Systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies |
title_short | Systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies |
title_sort | systematic analysis of mistletoe prescriptions in clinical studies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36481925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04511-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staupehenrike systematicanalysisofmistletoeprescriptionsinclinicalstudies AT buentzeljudith systematicanalysisofmistletoeprescriptionsinclinicalstudies AT keinkichristian systematicanalysisofmistletoeprescriptionsinclinicalstudies AT buentzeljens systematicanalysisofmistletoeprescriptionsinclinicalstudies AT huebnerjutta systematicanalysisofmistletoeprescriptionsinclinicalstudies |