Comprehensive evaluation of artifact reduction and tissue recovery effects of metal artifact reduction technique based on full-reference metric

For the comprehensive evaluation of metal artifact reduction (MAR) technique, not only the removal of metal artifacts but also the evaluation of the area restored by MAR is required. We propose a method to comprehensively evaluate the effect by MAR in this study. We have conducted the computed tomography scan to acquire both the evaluation image and the reference image for the full-reference based evaluation. The evaluation image and reference image were reconstructed into 24 image sets according to the tube potentials, image reconstruction method, and use of the MAR technique. Images of two different positions were selected according to the distance from metal and material (bone, tissue) distribution, and bone and tissue were automatically segmented in both evaluation and reference images. The values of full width at half the maximum (FWHM) and centroid were extracted after Gaussian modeling of each segmented region. Then, we computed four evaluation metrics (FWHM(NM): non-MAR to non-metal ratio of FWHM, FWHM(M): MAR to non-metal ratio of FWHM, CENT(NM): non-MAR to non-metal ratio of centroid, CENT(M): MAR to non-metal ratio of centroid), and the MAR image and non-MAR image were compared. The overlap ratio automatically segmented from the evaluation image and reference image were position 1 (bone: 99.61%, tissue: 99.23%) with 80 kVp, position 1 (bone: 99.32%, tissue: 99.56%) with 120 kVp, position 2 (bone: 99.20%, tissue: 99.73%) with 80 kVp, and position 2 (bone: 99.23%, tissue: 99.67%) with 120 kVp. The FWHM(NM) showing the change of image pixel value by metal artifact was calculated as (bone: 1.32–1.46, tissue: 1.08–1.16) at 80 kVp and (bone: 1.19–1.27, tissue: 1.02–1.05) at 120 kVp. More metal artifacts occurred at 80 kVp tube potential. Regardless of the tube potential and image reconstruction method, the MAR showed an overall artifact reduction effect (1 < FWHM(M) < FWHM(NM)). However, distortion of pixel values occurred due to the MAR in regions where metal artifacts were high in proximity to metal (1 < FWHM(NM) < FWHM(M)). Overall, the average value of the medium was maintained (CENT(M): 0.98–1.03) after MAR application, but there was a change of image value in region around the metal (CENT(M): 0.97–1.11). In this study, we propose a new method to evaluate the effect of metal artifacts and MAR technique using full-reference based method. Metal artifacts, effect of MAR technique, and side-effect caused by MAR technique were quantitatively analyzed through proposed method. There are some limitations in applying it to clinical imaging since our method is a reference-based evaluation. However, our experimental results were important for understanding the effects of the MAR technique and its functional properties.