Cargando…
Reply: Confounding in Mendelian randomisation studies
Mendelian randomisation (MR) overcomes classical confounding issues that beset observational studies. “Horizontal” but not “vertical” pleiotropy can bias MR study findings but we found no evidence that it was present in our MR analysis of GORD on IPF. https://bit.ly/3Jn7aeq
Autores principales: | Reynolds, Carl J., Minelli, Cosetta |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10356965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00995-2023 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reply to Suissa: Mortality in IMPACT: Confounded by Asthma?
por: Lipson, David A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Asthma and incident coronary heart disease: an observational and Mendelian randomisation study
por: Valencia-Hernández, Carlos A., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Confounding in case control studies
por: Raina, Sunil Kumar
Publicado: (2015) -
Reply to Pouwels et al.: Confounding Factors Affecting sRAGE as a Biomarker for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
por: Stockley, Robert A., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Reply to “The causal association between sarcopenia and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization analysis”
por: Kim, Min Cheol, et al.
Publicado: (2023)