Cargando…

Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of Ferula communis (Apiaceae)

INTRODUCTION: Plants are widely used in traditional medicine because they contain a high concentration of antimicrobial agents, serving as the foundation for medicines. The aim of this study was preliminary identification of phytochemicals and assesses the antimicrobial activity of extracts of Ferul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yirdaw, Betelihem, Kassa, Temesgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37392454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1170
_version_ 1785075460504289280
author Yirdaw, Betelihem
Kassa, Temesgen
author_facet Yirdaw, Betelihem
Kassa, Temesgen
author_sort Yirdaw, Betelihem
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Plants are widely used in traditional medicine because they contain a high concentration of antimicrobial agents, serving as the foundation for medicines. The aim of this study was preliminary identification of phytochemicals and assesses the antimicrobial activity of extracts of Ferula communis root bark. METHODS: Plant was collected, and standard qualitative procedures were conducted. The plant samples were extracted with 99.9% methanol and 80% ethanol. To identify phytochemicals found in plants, a preliminary phytochemical analysis was performed. Agar diffusion tests, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were performed to evaluate antibacterial activity. RESULT: The preliminary phytochemical analysis of the ethanol and methanol extract revealed positive results for flavonoids, coumarins and tannins. Terpenoids and anthraquinones were detected only in the methanol extract. The extract of Ferula communis showed an antibacterial effect on both gram‐negative and gram‐positive bacteria in a concentration‐dependent manner. The average zone of inhibition for gram‐positive bacteria was 11 mm, whereas for gram‐negative bacteria, it was 9 mm. The MIC and MBC values also varied with the type of bacteria. In all bacterial species tested, the mean MBC value was similar to the MIC. CONCLUSION: Different phytochemicals were detected in extracts of the root bark of F. communis and extracts showed antibacterial effects in a concentration‐dependent manner. Therefore, further purification and evaluation of the extracts and antioxidant activity of the plant should be investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10357268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103572682023-07-21 Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of Ferula communis (Apiaceae) Yirdaw, Betelihem Kassa, Temesgen Vet Med Sci OTHER INTRODUCTION: Plants are widely used in traditional medicine because they contain a high concentration of antimicrobial agents, serving as the foundation for medicines. The aim of this study was preliminary identification of phytochemicals and assesses the antimicrobial activity of extracts of Ferula communis root bark. METHODS: Plant was collected, and standard qualitative procedures were conducted. The plant samples were extracted with 99.9% methanol and 80% ethanol. To identify phytochemicals found in plants, a preliminary phytochemical analysis was performed. Agar diffusion tests, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were performed to evaluate antibacterial activity. RESULT: The preliminary phytochemical analysis of the ethanol and methanol extract revealed positive results for flavonoids, coumarins and tannins. Terpenoids and anthraquinones were detected only in the methanol extract. The extract of Ferula communis showed an antibacterial effect on both gram‐negative and gram‐positive bacteria in a concentration‐dependent manner. The average zone of inhibition for gram‐positive bacteria was 11 mm, whereas for gram‐negative bacteria, it was 9 mm. The MIC and MBC values also varied with the type of bacteria. In all bacterial species tested, the mean MBC value was similar to the MIC. CONCLUSION: Different phytochemicals were detected in extracts of the root bark of F. communis and extracts showed antibacterial effects in a concentration‐dependent manner. Therefore, further purification and evaluation of the extracts and antioxidant activity of the plant should be investigated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10357268/ /pubmed/37392454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1170 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle OTHER
Yirdaw, Betelihem
Kassa, Temesgen
Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of Ferula communis (Apiaceae)
title Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of Ferula communis (Apiaceae)
title_full Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of Ferula communis (Apiaceae)
title_fullStr Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of Ferula communis (Apiaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of Ferula communis (Apiaceae)
title_short Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of Ferula communis (Apiaceae)
title_sort preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial effects of root bark of ferula communis (apiaceae)
topic OTHER
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37392454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1170
work_keys_str_mv AT yirdawbetelihem preliminaryphytochemicalscreeningandantibacterialeffectsofrootbarkofferulacommunisapiaceae
AT kassatemesgen preliminaryphytochemicalscreeningandantibacterialeffectsofrootbarkofferulacommunisapiaceae