Cargando…
Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE
Two major goals of the Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network are to learn how best to return research results to patient/participants and the clinicians who care for them and also to assess the impact of placing these results in clinical care. Yet since its inception, the Network h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37343562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.011 |
_version_ | 1785075500746539008 |
---|---|
author | Clayton, Ellen Wright Smith, Maureen E. Anderson, Katherine C. Chung, Wendy K. Connolly, John J. Fullerton, Stephanie M. McGowan, Michelle L. Peterson, Josh F. Prows, Cynthia A. Sabatello, Maya Holm, Ingrid A. |
author_facet | Clayton, Ellen Wright Smith, Maureen E. Anderson, Katherine C. Chung, Wendy K. Connolly, John J. Fullerton, Stephanie M. McGowan, Michelle L. Peterson, Josh F. Prows, Cynthia A. Sabatello, Maya Holm, Ingrid A. |
author_sort | Clayton, Ellen Wright |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two major goals of the Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network are to learn how best to return research results to patient/participants and the clinicians who care for them and also to assess the impact of placing these results in clinical care. Yet since its inception, the Network has confronted a host of challenges in achieving these goals, many of which had ethical, legal, or social implications (ELSIs) that required consideration. Here, we share impediments we encountered in recruiting participants, returning results, and assessing their impact, all of which affected our ability to achieve the goals of eMERGE, as well as the steps we took to attempt to address these obstacles. We divide the domains in which we experienced challenges into four broad categories: (1) study design, including recruitment of more diverse groups; (2) consent; (3) returning results to participants and their health care providers (HCPs); and (4) assessment of follow-up care of participants and measuring the impact of research on participants and their families. Since most phases of eMERGE have included children as well as adults, we also address the particular ELSI posed by including pediatric populations in this research. We make specific suggestions for improving translational genomic research to ensure that future projects can effectively return results and assess their impact on patient/participants and providers if the goals of genomic-informed medicine are to be achieved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10357472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103574722023-07-21 Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE Clayton, Ellen Wright Smith, Maureen E. Anderson, Katherine C. Chung, Wendy K. Connolly, John J. Fullerton, Stephanie M. McGowan, Michelle L. Peterson, Josh F. Prows, Cynthia A. Sabatello, Maya Holm, Ingrid A. Am J Hum Genet Review Two major goals of the Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network are to learn how best to return research results to patient/participants and the clinicians who care for them and also to assess the impact of placing these results in clinical care. Yet since its inception, the Network has confronted a host of challenges in achieving these goals, many of which had ethical, legal, or social implications (ELSIs) that required consideration. Here, we share impediments we encountered in recruiting participants, returning results, and assessing their impact, all of which affected our ability to achieve the goals of eMERGE, as well as the steps we took to attempt to address these obstacles. We divide the domains in which we experienced challenges into four broad categories: (1) study design, including recruitment of more diverse groups; (2) consent; (3) returning results to participants and their health care providers (HCPs); and (4) assessment of follow-up care of participants and measuring the impact of research on participants and their families. Since most phases of eMERGE have included children as well as adults, we also address the particular ELSI posed by including pediatric populations in this research. We make specific suggestions for improving translational genomic research to ensure that future projects can effectively return results and assess their impact on patient/participants and providers if the goals of genomic-informed medicine are to be achieved. Elsevier 2023-07-06 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10357472/ /pubmed/37343562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.011 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Clayton, Ellen Wright Smith, Maureen E. Anderson, Katherine C. Chung, Wendy K. Connolly, John J. Fullerton, Stephanie M. McGowan, Michelle L. Peterson, Josh F. Prows, Cynthia A. Sabatello, Maya Holm, Ingrid A. Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE |
title | Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE |
title_full | Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE |
title_fullStr | Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE |
title_full_unstemmed | Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE |
title_short | Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE |
title_sort | studying the impact of translational genomic research: lessons from emerge |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37343562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claytonellenwright studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT smithmaureene studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT andersonkatherinec studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT chungwendyk studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT connollyjohnj studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT fullertonstephaniem studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT mcgowanmichellel studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT petersonjoshf studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT prowscynthiaa studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT sabatellomaya studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge AT holmingrida studyingtheimpactoftranslationalgenomicresearchlessonsfromemerge |