Cargando…

Optical Response, Lithium Doping, and Charge Transfer in Sn-Based 312 MAX Phases

[Image: see text] The optical response, lithium doping, and charge transfer in three Sn-based existing M(3)SnC(2) MAX phases with electron localization function (ELF) were investigated using density functional theory (DFT). Optical calculations show a slight optical anisotropy in the spectra of diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadi, Md. Abdul, Kelaidis, Nicolas, Christopoulos, Stavros-Richard G., Chroneos, Alexander, Naqib, Saleh Hasan, Islam, A. K. M. Azharul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03645
_version_ 1785075509123612672
author Hadi, Md. Abdul
Kelaidis, Nicolas
Christopoulos, Stavros-Richard G.
Chroneos, Alexander
Naqib, Saleh Hasan
Islam, A. K. M. Azharul
author_facet Hadi, Md. Abdul
Kelaidis, Nicolas
Christopoulos, Stavros-Richard G.
Chroneos, Alexander
Naqib, Saleh Hasan
Islam, A. K. M. Azharul
author_sort Hadi, Md. Abdul
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The optical response, lithium doping, and charge transfer in three Sn-based existing M(3)SnC(2) MAX phases with electron localization function (ELF) were investigated using density functional theory (DFT). Optical calculations show a slight optical anisotropy in the spectra of different optical parameters in some energy ranges of the incident photons. The peak height is mostly slightly higher for the polarization ⟨001⟩. The highest peak shifts toward higher energy when the M-element Ti is replaced by Zr and then by Hf. Optical conductivity, refractive index, extinction coefficient, and dielectric functions reveal the metallic nature of Ti(3)SnC(2), Zr(3)SnC(2), and Hf(3)SnC(2). The plasma frequencies of these materials are very similar for two different polarizations and are 12.97, 13.56, and 14.46 eV, respectively. The formation energies of Li-doped Zr(3)SnC(2) and Hf(3)SnC(2) are considerably lower than those of their Li-doped 211 MAX phase counterparts Zr(2)SnC and Hf(2)SnC. Consistently, the formation energy of Li-doped Ti(3)SnC(2) is lower than that of the corresponding 2D MXene Ti(3)C(2), which is a promising photothermal material. The Bader charge is higher in magnitude than the Mulliken and Hirschfeld charges. The highest charge transfer occurs in Zr(3)SnC(2) and the lowest charge transfer occurs in Ti(3)SnC(2). ELF reveals that the bonds between carbon and metal ions are strongly localized, whereas in the case of Sn and metal ions, there is less localization which is interpreted as a weak bond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10357525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103575252023-07-21 Optical Response, Lithium Doping, and Charge Transfer in Sn-Based 312 MAX Phases Hadi, Md. Abdul Kelaidis, Nicolas Christopoulos, Stavros-Richard G. Chroneos, Alexander Naqib, Saleh Hasan Islam, A. K. M. Azharul ACS Omega [Image: see text] The optical response, lithium doping, and charge transfer in three Sn-based existing M(3)SnC(2) MAX phases with electron localization function (ELF) were investigated using density functional theory (DFT). Optical calculations show a slight optical anisotropy in the spectra of different optical parameters in some energy ranges of the incident photons. The peak height is mostly slightly higher for the polarization ⟨001⟩. The highest peak shifts toward higher energy when the M-element Ti is replaced by Zr and then by Hf. Optical conductivity, refractive index, extinction coefficient, and dielectric functions reveal the metallic nature of Ti(3)SnC(2), Zr(3)SnC(2), and Hf(3)SnC(2). The plasma frequencies of these materials are very similar for two different polarizations and are 12.97, 13.56, and 14.46 eV, respectively. The formation energies of Li-doped Zr(3)SnC(2) and Hf(3)SnC(2) are considerably lower than those of their Li-doped 211 MAX phase counterparts Zr(2)SnC and Hf(2)SnC. Consistently, the formation energy of Li-doped Ti(3)SnC(2) is lower than that of the corresponding 2D MXene Ti(3)C(2), which is a promising photothermal material. The Bader charge is higher in magnitude than the Mulliken and Hirschfeld charges. The highest charge transfer occurs in Zr(3)SnC(2) and the lowest charge transfer occurs in Ti(3)SnC(2). ELF reveals that the bonds between carbon and metal ions are strongly localized, whereas in the case of Sn and metal ions, there is less localization which is interpreted as a weak bond. American Chemical Society 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10357525/ /pubmed/37483256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03645 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Hadi, Md. Abdul
Kelaidis, Nicolas
Christopoulos, Stavros-Richard G.
Chroneos, Alexander
Naqib, Saleh Hasan
Islam, A. K. M. Azharul
Optical Response, Lithium Doping, and Charge Transfer in Sn-Based 312 MAX Phases
title Optical Response, Lithium Doping, and Charge Transfer in Sn-Based 312 MAX Phases
title_full Optical Response, Lithium Doping, and Charge Transfer in Sn-Based 312 MAX Phases
title_fullStr Optical Response, Lithium Doping, and Charge Transfer in Sn-Based 312 MAX Phases
title_full_unstemmed Optical Response, Lithium Doping, and Charge Transfer in Sn-Based 312 MAX Phases
title_short Optical Response, Lithium Doping, and Charge Transfer in Sn-Based 312 MAX Phases
title_sort optical response, lithium doping, and charge transfer in sn-based 312 max phases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03645
work_keys_str_mv AT hadimdabdul opticalresponselithiumdopingandchargetransferinsnbased312maxphases
AT kelaidisnicolas opticalresponselithiumdopingandchargetransferinsnbased312maxphases
AT christopoulosstavrosrichardg opticalresponselithiumdopingandchargetransferinsnbased312maxphases
AT chroneosalexander opticalresponselithiumdopingandchargetransferinsnbased312maxphases
AT naqibsalehhasan opticalresponselithiumdopingandchargetransferinsnbased312maxphases
AT islamakmazharul opticalresponselithiumdopingandchargetransferinsnbased312maxphases