Cargando…

Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Self-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Morgan, Holmes, Natasha, Eastwood, Glenn, Vogrin, Sara, James, Fiona, Phung, Michelle, Barnes, Sara, Murfin, Brendan, Rogers, Ben, Lambros, Belinda, Peel, Trisha, Gibney, Grace, Slavin, Monica, Trubiano, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37475038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8
_version_ 1785075530407608320
author Rose, Morgan
Holmes, Natasha
Eastwood, Glenn
Vogrin, Sara
James, Fiona
Phung, Michelle
Barnes, Sara
Murfin, Brendan
Rogers, Ben
Lambros, Belinda
Peel, Trisha
Gibney, Grace
Slavin, Monica
Trubiano, Jason
author_facet Rose, Morgan
Holmes, Natasha
Eastwood, Glenn
Vogrin, Sara
James, Fiona
Phung, Michelle
Barnes, Sara
Murfin, Brendan
Rogers, Ben
Lambros, Belinda
Peel, Trisha
Gibney, Grace
Slavin, Monica
Trubiano, Jason
author_sort Rose, Morgan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical stability and reliability of penicillin skin testing. Allergy assessment tools exist to identify low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes and facilitate direct oral challenge delabelling. PEN-FAST is a clinical decision rule that has been validated to predict true penicillin allergy in a cohort of non-critically ill patients. There is however limited evidence regarding the feasibility, safety and efficacy of direct oral challenges and the use of delabelling clinical decisions rules in the intensive care setting. METHODS: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes (PEN-FAST score < 3) will be randomised 1:1 to direct oral penicillin challenge (single dose 250 mg oral amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) or routine care, followed by a 2-h observation period. Patients will receive a second oral challenge/observation prior to hospital discharge (with subsequent observation for 2 h). An assessment for antibiotic-associated adverse events will also be undertaken at 24 h and 5 days post each challenge/observation and again at 90 days post-randomisation. The primary outcome measures are feasibility (proportion of eligible patients recruited and protocol compliance) and safety (proportion of patients who experience an antibiotic-associated immune-mediated adverse event or serious adverse event). DISCUSSION: We will report the feasibility and safety of point-of-care penicillin direct oral challenge in this first randomised controlled trial of low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospitalised patients. Upon completion of the project, important findings will inform the design of planned large prospective multi-centre clinical trials in Australian and international ICUs, further examining safety and efficacy and exploring antimicrobial prescribing-related outcomes following penicillin oral challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ACTRN12621000051842 Date registered: 20/01/2021 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379735&isReview=true SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10357614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103576142023-07-21 Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial Rose, Morgan Holmes, Natasha Eastwood, Glenn Vogrin, Sara James, Fiona Phung, Michelle Barnes, Sara Murfin, Brendan Rogers, Ben Lambros, Belinda Peel, Trisha Gibney, Grace Slavin, Monica Trubiano, Jason Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Self-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical stability and reliability of penicillin skin testing. Allergy assessment tools exist to identify low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes and facilitate direct oral challenge delabelling. PEN-FAST is a clinical decision rule that has been validated to predict true penicillin allergy in a cohort of non-critically ill patients. There is however limited evidence regarding the feasibility, safety and efficacy of direct oral challenges and the use of delabelling clinical decisions rules in the intensive care setting. METHODS: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes (PEN-FAST score < 3) will be randomised 1:1 to direct oral penicillin challenge (single dose 250 mg oral amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) or routine care, followed by a 2-h observation period. Patients will receive a second oral challenge/observation prior to hospital discharge (with subsequent observation for 2 h). An assessment for antibiotic-associated adverse events will also be undertaken at 24 h and 5 days post each challenge/observation and again at 90 days post-randomisation. The primary outcome measures are feasibility (proportion of eligible patients recruited and protocol compliance) and safety (proportion of patients who experience an antibiotic-associated immune-mediated adverse event or serious adverse event). DISCUSSION: We will report the feasibility and safety of point-of-care penicillin direct oral challenge in this first randomised controlled trial of low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospitalised patients. Upon completion of the project, important findings will inform the design of planned large prospective multi-centre clinical trials in Australian and international ICUs, further examining safety and efficacy and exploring antimicrobial prescribing-related outcomes following penicillin oral challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ACTRN12621000051842 Date registered: 20/01/2021 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379735&isReview=true SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8. BioMed Central 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10357614/ /pubmed/37475038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rose, Morgan
Holmes, Natasha
Eastwood, Glenn
Vogrin, Sara
James, Fiona
Phung, Michelle
Barnes, Sara
Murfin, Brendan
Rogers, Ben
Lambros, Belinda
Peel, Trisha
Gibney, Grace
Slavin, Monica
Trubiano, Jason
Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial
title Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (oracle): a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37475038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rosemorgan oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT holmesnatasha oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eastwoodglenn oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vogrinsara oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jamesfiona oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT phungmichelle oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT barnessara oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT murfinbrendan oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rogersben oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lambrosbelinda oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT peeltrisha oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gibneygrace oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT slavinmonica oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT trubianojason oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial