Cargando…
Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Self-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical sta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37475038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8 |
_version_ | 1785075530407608320 |
---|---|
author | Rose, Morgan Holmes, Natasha Eastwood, Glenn Vogrin, Sara James, Fiona Phung, Michelle Barnes, Sara Murfin, Brendan Rogers, Ben Lambros, Belinda Peel, Trisha Gibney, Grace Slavin, Monica Trubiano, Jason |
author_facet | Rose, Morgan Holmes, Natasha Eastwood, Glenn Vogrin, Sara James, Fiona Phung, Michelle Barnes, Sara Murfin, Brendan Rogers, Ben Lambros, Belinda Peel, Trisha Gibney, Grace Slavin, Monica Trubiano, Jason |
author_sort | Rose, Morgan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Self-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical stability and reliability of penicillin skin testing. Allergy assessment tools exist to identify low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes and facilitate direct oral challenge delabelling. PEN-FAST is a clinical decision rule that has been validated to predict true penicillin allergy in a cohort of non-critically ill patients. There is however limited evidence regarding the feasibility, safety and efficacy of direct oral challenges and the use of delabelling clinical decisions rules in the intensive care setting. METHODS: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes (PEN-FAST score < 3) will be randomised 1:1 to direct oral penicillin challenge (single dose 250 mg oral amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) or routine care, followed by a 2-h observation period. Patients will receive a second oral challenge/observation prior to hospital discharge (with subsequent observation for 2 h). An assessment for antibiotic-associated adverse events will also be undertaken at 24 h and 5 days post each challenge/observation and again at 90 days post-randomisation. The primary outcome measures are feasibility (proportion of eligible patients recruited and protocol compliance) and safety (proportion of patients who experience an antibiotic-associated immune-mediated adverse event or serious adverse event). DISCUSSION: We will report the feasibility and safety of point-of-care penicillin direct oral challenge in this first randomised controlled trial of low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospitalised patients. Upon completion of the project, important findings will inform the design of planned large prospective multi-centre clinical trials in Australian and international ICUs, further examining safety and efficacy and exploring antimicrobial prescribing-related outcomes following penicillin oral challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ACTRN12621000051842 Date registered: 20/01/2021 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379735&isReview=true SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10357614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103576142023-07-21 Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial Rose, Morgan Holmes, Natasha Eastwood, Glenn Vogrin, Sara James, Fiona Phung, Michelle Barnes, Sara Murfin, Brendan Rogers, Ben Lambros, Belinda Peel, Trisha Gibney, Grace Slavin, Monica Trubiano, Jason Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Self-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical stability and reliability of penicillin skin testing. Allergy assessment tools exist to identify low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes and facilitate direct oral challenge delabelling. PEN-FAST is a clinical decision rule that has been validated to predict true penicillin allergy in a cohort of non-critically ill patients. There is however limited evidence regarding the feasibility, safety and efficacy of direct oral challenges and the use of delabelling clinical decisions rules in the intensive care setting. METHODS: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes (PEN-FAST score < 3) will be randomised 1:1 to direct oral penicillin challenge (single dose 250 mg oral amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) or routine care, followed by a 2-h observation period. Patients will receive a second oral challenge/observation prior to hospital discharge (with subsequent observation for 2 h). An assessment for antibiotic-associated adverse events will also be undertaken at 24 h and 5 days post each challenge/observation and again at 90 days post-randomisation. The primary outcome measures are feasibility (proportion of eligible patients recruited and protocol compliance) and safety (proportion of patients who experience an antibiotic-associated immune-mediated adverse event or serious adverse event). DISCUSSION: We will report the feasibility and safety of point-of-care penicillin direct oral challenge in this first randomised controlled trial of low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospitalised patients. Upon completion of the project, important findings will inform the design of planned large prospective multi-centre clinical trials in Australian and international ICUs, further examining safety and efficacy and exploring antimicrobial prescribing-related outcomes following penicillin oral challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ACTRN12621000051842 Date registered: 20/01/2021 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379735&isReview=true SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8. BioMed Central 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10357614/ /pubmed/37475038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Rose, Morgan Holmes, Natasha Eastwood, Glenn Vogrin, Sara James, Fiona Phung, Michelle Barnes, Sara Murfin, Brendan Rogers, Ben Lambros, Belinda Peel, Trisha Gibney, Grace Slavin, Monica Trubiano, Jason Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title | Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (oracle): a pilot randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37475038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01337-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosemorgan oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT holmesnatasha oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT eastwoodglenn oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vogrinsara oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jamesfiona oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT phungmichelle oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT barnessara oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT murfinbrendan oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rogersben oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lambrosbelinda oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT peeltrisha oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gibneygrace oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT slavinmonica oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT trubianojason oralchallengevsroutinecaretoassesslowriskpenicillinallergyincriticallyillhospitalpatientsoracleapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial |