_version_ 1785075536622518272
author Bissell, Malenka M.
Raimondi, Francesca
Ait Ali, Lamia
Allen, Bradley D.
Barker, Alex J.
Bolger, Ann
Burris, Nicholas
Carhäll, Carl-Johan
Collins, Jeremy D.
Ebbers, Tino
Francois, Christopher J.
Frydrychowicz, Alex
Garg, Pankaj
Geiger, Julia
Ha, Hojin
Hennemuth, Anja
Hope, Michael D.
Hsiao, Albert
Johnson, Kevin
Kozerke, Sebastian
Ma, Liliana E.
Markl, Michael
Martins, Duarte
Messina, Marci
Oechtering, Thekla H.
van Ooij, Pim
Rigsby, Cynthia
Rodriguez-Palomares, Jose
Roest, Arno A. W.
Roldán-Alzate, Alejandro
Schnell, Susanne
Sotelo, Julio
Stuber, Matthias
Syed, Ali B.
Töger, Johannes
van der Geest, Rob
Westenberg, Jos
Zhong, Liang
Zhong, Yumin
Wieben, Oliver
Dyverfeldt, Petter
author_facet Bissell, Malenka M.
Raimondi, Francesca
Ait Ali, Lamia
Allen, Bradley D.
Barker, Alex J.
Bolger, Ann
Burris, Nicholas
Carhäll, Carl-Johan
Collins, Jeremy D.
Ebbers, Tino
Francois, Christopher J.
Frydrychowicz, Alex
Garg, Pankaj
Geiger, Julia
Ha, Hojin
Hennemuth, Anja
Hope, Michael D.
Hsiao, Albert
Johnson, Kevin
Kozerke, Sebastian
Ma, Liliana E.
Markl, Michael
Martins, Duarte
Messina, Marci
Oechtering, Thekla H.
van Ooij, Pim
Rigsby, Cynthia
Rodriguez-Palomares, Jose
Roest, Arno A. W.
Roldán-Alzate, Alejandro
Schnell, Susanne
Sotelo, Julio
Stuber, Matthias
Syed, Ali B.
Töger, Johannes
van der Geest, Rob
Westenberg, Jos
Zhong, Liang
Zhong, Yumin
Wieben, Oliver
Dyverfeldt, Petter
author_sort Bissell, Malenka M.
collection PubMed
description Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 ‘4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement’. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10357639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103576392023-07-21 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update Bissell, Malenka M. Raimondi, Francesca Ait Ali, Lamia Allen, Bradley D. Barker, Alex J. Bolger, Ann Burris, Nicholas Carhäll, Carl-Johan Collins, Jeremy D. Ebbers, Tino Francois, Christopher J. Frydrychowicz, Alex Garg, Pankaj Geiger, Julia Ha, Hojin Hennemuth, Anja Hope, Michael D. Hsiao, Albert Johnson, Kevin Kozerke, Sebastian Ma, Liliana E. Markl, Michael Martins, Duarte Messina, Marci Oechtering, Thekla H. van Ooij, Pim Rigsby, Cynthia Rodriguez-Palomares, Jose Roest, Arno A. W. Roldán-Alzate, Alejandro Schnell, Susanne Sotelo, Julio Stuber, Matthias Syed, Ali B. Töger, Johannes van der Geest, Rob Westenberg, Jos Zhong, Liang Zhong, Yumin Wieben, Oliver Dyverfeldt, Petter J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Review Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 ‘4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement’. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards. BioMed Central 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10357639/ /pubmed/37474977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Bissell, Malenka M.
Raimondi, Francesca
Ait Ali, Lamia
Allen, Bradley D.
Barker, Alex J.
Bolger, Ann
Burris, Nicholas
Carhäll, Carl-Johan
Collins, Jeremy D.
Ebbers, Tino
Francois, Christopher J.
Frydrychowicz, Alex
Garg, Pankaj
Geiger, Julia
Ha, Hojin
Hennemuth, Anja
Hope, Michael D.
Hsiao, Albert
Johnson, Kevin
Kozerke, Sebastian
Ma, Liliana E.
Markl, Michael
Martins, Duarte
Messina, Marci
Oechtering, Thekla H.
van Ooij, Pim
Rigsby, Cynthia
Rodriguez-Palomares, Jose
Roest, Arno A. W.
Roldán-Alzate, Alejandro
Schnell, Susanne
Sotelo, Julio
Stuber, Matthias
Syed, Ali B.
Töger, Johannes
van der Geest, Rob
Westenberg, Jos
Zhong, Liang
Zhong, Yumin
Wieben, Oliver
Dyverfeldt, Petter
4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update
title 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update
title_full 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update
title_fullStr 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update
title_full_unstemmed 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update
title_short 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update
title_sort 4d flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bissellmalenkam 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT raimondifrancesca 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT aitalilamia 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT allenbradleyd 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT barkeralexj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT bolgerann 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT burrisnicholas 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT carhallcarljohan 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT collinsjeremyd 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT ebberstino 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT francoischristopherj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT frydrychowiczalex 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT gargpankaj 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT geigerjulia 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT hahojin 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT hennemuthanja 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT hopemichaeld 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT hsiaoalbert 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT johnsonkevin 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT kozerkesebastian 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT malilianae 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT marklmichael 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT martinsduarte 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT messinamarci 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT oechteringtheklah 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT vanooijpim 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT rigsbycynthia 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT rodriguezpalomaresjose 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT roestarnoaw 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT roldanalzatealejandro 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT schnellsusanne 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT sotelojulio 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT stubermatthias 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT syedalib 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT togerjohannes 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT vandergeestrob 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT westenbergjos 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT zhongliang 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT zhongyumin 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT wiebenoliver 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update
AT dyverfeldtpetter 4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceconsensusstatement2023update