Cargando…

A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research

Recent major health shocks, such as the 2014–16 Ebola, the Zika outbreak, and, last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic, have strongly contributed to drawing attention to the issue of resilience in the healthcare domain. Nevertheless, the scientific literature appears fragmented, creating difficult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agostini, L., Onofrio, R., Piccolo, C., Stefanini, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37468875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09701-3
_version_ 1785075549558800384
author Agostini, L.
Onofrio, R.
Piccolo, C.
Stefanini, A.
author_facet Agostini, L.
Onofrio, R.
Piccolo, C.
Stefanini, A.
author_sort Agostini, L.
collection PubMed
description Recent major health shocks, such as the 2014–16 Ebola, the Zika outbreak, and, last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic, have strongly contributed to drawing attention to the issue of resilience in the healthcare domain. Nevertheless, the scientific literature appears fragmented, creating difficulties in developing incremental research in this relevant managerial field. To fill this gap, this systematic literature review aims to provide a clear state of the art of the literature dealing with resilience in healthcare. Specifically, from the analysis of the theoretical articles and reviews, the key dimensions of resilience are identified, and a novel classification framework is proposed. The classification framework is then used to systematize extant empirical contributions. Two main dimensions of resilience are identified: the approach to resilience (reactive vs. proactive) and the type of crisis to deal with (acute shocks vs. chronic stressors). Four main streams of research are thus identified: (i) proactive approaches to acute shocks; (ii) proactive approaches to chronic stressors; (iii) reactive approaches to acute shocks; and (iv) reactive approaches to chronic stressors. These are scrutinised considering three additional dimensions: the level of analysis, the resources to nurture resilience, and the country context. The classification framework and the associated mapping contribute to systematising the fragmented literature on resilience in healthcare, providing a clear picture of the state of the art in this field and drawing a research agenda that opens interesting paths for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09701-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10357696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103576962023-07-21 A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research Agostini, L. Onofrio, R. Piccolo, C. Stefanini, A. BMC Health Serv Res Research Recent major health shocks, such as the 2014–16 Ebola, the Zika outbreak, and, last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic, have strongly contributed to drawing attention to the issue of resilience in the healthcare domain. Nevertheless, the scientific literature appears fragmented, creating difficulties in developing incremental research in this relevant managerial field. To fill this gap, this systematic literature review aims to provide a clear state of the art of the literature dealing with resilience in healthcare. Specifically, from the analysis of the theoretical articles and reviews, the key dimensions of resilience are identified, and a novel classification framework is proposed. The classification framework is then used to systematize extant empirical contributions. Two main dimensions of resilience are identified: the approach to resilience (reactive vs. proactive) and the type of crisis to deal with (acute shocks vs. chronic stressors). Four main streams of research are thus identified: (i) proactive approaches to acute shocks; (ii) proactive approaches to chronic stressors; (iii) reactive approaches to acute shocks; and (iv) reactive approaches to chronic stressors. These are scrutinised considering three additional dimensions: the level of analysis, the resources to nurture resilience, and the country context. The classification framework and the associated mapping contribute to systematising the fragmented literature on resilience in healthcare, providing a clear picture of the state of the art in this field and drawing a research agenda that opens interesting paths for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09701-3. BioMed Central 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10357696/ /pubmed/37468875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09701-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Agostini, L.
Onofrio, R.
Piccolo, C.
Stefanini, A.
A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research
title A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research
title_full A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research
title_fullStr A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research
title_full_unstemmed A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research
title_short A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research
title_sort management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37468875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09701-3
work_keys_str_mv AT agostinil amanagementperspectiveonresilienceinhealthcareaframeworkandavenuesforfutureresearch
AT onofrior amanagementperspectiveonresilienceinhealthcareaframeworkandavenuesforfutureresearch
AT piccoloc amanagementperspectiveonresilienceinhealthcareaframeworkandavenuesforfutureresearch
AT stefaninia amanagementperspectiveonresilienceinhealthcareaframeworkandavenuesforfutureresearch
AT agostinil managementperspectiveonresilienceinhealthcareaframeworkandavenuesforfutureresearch
AT onofrior managementperspectiveonresilienceinhealthcareaframeworkandavenuesforfutureresearch
AT piccoloc managementperspectiveonresilienceinhealthcareaframeworkandavenuesforfutureresearch
AT stefaninia managementperspectiveonresilienceinhealthcareaframeworkandavenuesforfutureresearch