Cargando…

Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study

INTRODUCTION: The Canadian population has poor and inequitable access to psychiatric care despite a steady per-capita supply of psychiatrists in most provinces. There is some quantitative evidence that practice style and characteristics vary substantially among psychiatrists. However, how this compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudoler, David, Lavergne, M Ruth, Marshall, Emily Gard, Zaheer, Juveria, Etches, Selene, Good, Kimberley P, Grudniewicz, Agnes, Katz, Alan, Kurdyak, Paul, Bolton, James, Kaoser, Ridhwana, Moravac, Catherine, Morrison, Jason, Mulsant, Benoit, Peterson, Sandra, Tibbo, Phil G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37463812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073183
_version_ 1785075554676899840
author Rudoler, David
Lavergne, M Ruth
Marshall, Emily Gard
Zaheer, Juveria
Etches, Selene
Good, Kimberley P
Grudniewicz, Agnes
Katz, Alan
Kurdyak, Paul
Bolton, James
Kaoser, Ridhwana
Moravac, Catherine
Morrison, Jason
Mulsant, Benoit
Peterson, Sandra
Tibbo, Phil G
author_facet Rudoler, David
Lavergne, M Ruth
Marshall, Emily Gard
Zaheer, Juveria
Etches, Selene
Good, Kimberley P
Grudniewicz, Agnes
Katz, Alan
Kurdyak, Paul
Bolton, James
Kaoser, Ridhwana
Moravac, Catherine
Morrison, Jason
Mulsant, Benoit
Peterson, Sandra
Tibbo, Phil G
author_sort Rudoler, David
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Canadian population has poor and inequitable access to psychiatric care despite a steady per-capita supply of psychiatrists in most provinces. There is some quantitative evidence that practice style and characteristics vary substantially among psychiatrists. However, how this compares across jurisdictions and implications for workforce planning require further study. A qualitative exploration of psychiatrists’ preferences for practice style and the practice choices that result is also lacking. The goal of this study is to inform psychiatrist workforce planning to improve access to psychiatric care by: (1) developing and evaluating comparable indicators of supply of psychiatric care across provinces, (2) analysing variations and changes in the characteristics of the psychiatrist workforce, including demographics and practice style and (3) studying psychiatrist practice choices and intentions, and the factors that lead to these choices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cross-provincial mixed-methods study will be conducted in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia. We will analyse linked-health administrative data within three of the four provinces to develop comparable indicators of supply and characterise psychiatric services at the regional level within provinces. We will use latent profile analysis to estimate the probability that a psychiatrist is in a particular practice style and map the geographical distribution of psychiatrist practices overlayed with measures of need for psychiatric care. We will also conduct in-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews with psychiatrists in each province to explore their preferences and practice choices and to inform workforce planning. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by Ontario Tech University Research Ethics Board (16637 and 16795) and institutions affiliated with the study team. We built a team comprising experienced researchers, psychiatrists, medical educators and policymakers in mental health services and workforce planning to disseminate knowledge that will support effective human resource policies to improve access to psychiatric care in Canada.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10357719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103577192023-07-21 Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study Rudoler, David Lavergne, M Ruth Marshall, Emily Gard Zaheer, Juveria Etches, Selene Good, Kimberley P Grudniewicz, Agnes Katz, Alan Kurdyak, Paul Bolton, James Kaoser, Ridhwana Moravac, Catherine Morrison, Jason Mulsant, Benoit Peterson, Sandra Tibbo, Phil G BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: The Canadian population has poor and inequitable access to psychiatric care despite a steady per-capita supply of psychiatrists in most provinces. There is some quantitative evidence that practice style and characteristics vary substantially among psychiatrists. However, how this compares across jurisdictions and implications for workforce planning require further study. A qualitative exploration of psychiatrists’ preferences for practice style and the practice choices that result is also lacking. The goal of this study is to inform psychiatrist workforce planning to improve access to psychiatric care by: (1) developing and evaluating comparable indicators of supply of psychiatric care across provinces, (2) analysing variations and changes in the characteristics of the psychiatrist workforce, including demographics and practice style and (3) studying psychiatrist practice choices and intentions, and the factors that lead to these choices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cross-provincial mixed-methods study will be conducted in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia. We will analyse linked-health administrative data within three of the four provinces to develop comparable indicators of supply and characterise psychiatric services at the regional level within provinces. We will use latent profile analysis to estimate the probability that a psychiatrist is in a particular practice style and map the geographical distribution of psychiatrist practices overlayed with measures of need for psychiatric care. We will also conduct in-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews with psychiatrists in each province to explore their preferences and practice choices and to inform workforce planning. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by Ontario Tech University Research Ethics Board (16637 and 16795) and institutions affiliated with the study team. We built a team comprising experienced researchers, psychiatrists, medical educators and policymakers in mental health services and workforce planning to disseminate knowledge that will support effective human resource policies to improve access to psychiatric care in Canada. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10357719/ /pubmed/37463812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073183 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Rudoler, David
Lavergne, M Ruth
Marshall, Emily Gard
Zaheer, Juveria
Etches, Selene
Good, Kimberley P
Grudniewicz, Agnes
Katz, Alan
Kurdyak, Paul
Bolton, James
Kaoser, Ridhwana
Moravac, Catherine
Morrison, Jason
Mulsant, Benoit
Peterson, Sandra
Tibbo, Phil G
Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study
title Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study
title_full Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study
title_short Pan-Canadian study of psychiatric care (PCPC): protocol for a mixed-methods study
title_sort pan-canadian study of psychiatric care (pcpc): protocol for a mixed-methods study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37463812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073183
work_keys_str_mv AT rudolerdavid pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT lavergnemruth pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT marshallemilygard pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT zaheerjuveria pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT etchesselene pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT goodkimberleyp pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT grudniewiczagnes pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT katzalan pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT kurdyakpaul pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT boltonjames pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT kaoserridhwana pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT moravaccatherine pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT morrisonjason pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT mulsantbenoit pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT petersonsandra pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT tibbophilg pancanadianstudyofpsychiatriccarepcpcprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy