Cargando…
The association of the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the association between the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria (DHRCs) with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined (NOC) prostate cancer in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). MATERIAL AN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483849 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.030 |
_version_ | 1785075577620791296 |
---|---|
author | Chierigo, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Sorce, Gabriele Hoeh, Benedikt Hohenhorst, Lukas Tian, Zhe Saad, Fred Gallucci, Michele Briganti, Alberto Montorsi, Francesco Chun, Felix K.H. Graefen, Markus Shariat, Shahrokh F. Guano, Giovanni Mantica, Guglielmo Borghesi, Marco Suardi, Nazareno Terrone, Carlo Karakiewicz, Pierre I. |
author_facet | Chierigo, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Sorce, Gabriele Hoeh, Benedikt Hohenhorst, Lukas Tian, Zhe Saad, Fred Gallucci, Michele Briganti, Alberto Montorsi, Francesco Chun, Felix K.H. Graefen, Markus Shariat, Shahrokh F. Guano, Giovanni Mantica, Guglielmo Borghesi, Marco Suardi, Nazareno Terrone, Carlo Karakiewicz, Pierre I. |
author_sort | Chierigo, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the association between the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria (DHRCs) with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined (NOC) prostate cancer in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2016), we identified 12961 RP and PLDN patients with at least one DHRC. We relied on descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 12 961 patients, 6135 (47%) exclusively harboured biopsy Gleason score (GS) 8–10, 3526 (27%) had clinical stage ≥T2c, and 1234 (9.5%) had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/mL. Only 1886 (15%) harboured any combination of 2 DHRCs. Finally, all 3 DHRCs were present in 180 (1.4%) patients. NOC rates increased from 32% for clinical T stage ≥T2c to 49% for either GS 8–10 only or PSA >20 ng/mL only and to 66–68% for any combination of 2 DHRCs, and to 84% for respectively all 3 DHRCs, which resulted in a multivariable logistic regression OR of 1.00, 2.01 (95% CI 1.85–2.19; p <0.001), 4.16 (95% CI 3.69–4.68; p <0.001), and 10.83 (95% CI 7.35–16.52; p <0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates a stimulus-response effect according to the type and number of DHRCs. Hence, a formal risk-stratification within high-risk prostate cancer patients should be considered in clinical decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10357822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103578222023-07-21 The association of the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer Chierigo, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Sorce, Gabriele Hoeh, Benedikt Hohenhorst, Lukas Tian, Zhe Saad, Fred Gallucci, Michele Briganti, Alberto Montorsi, Francesco Chun, Felix K.H. Graefen, Markus Shariat, Shahrokh F. Guano, Giovanni Mantica, Guglielmo Borghesi, Marco Suardi, Nazareno Terrone, Carlo Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the association between the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria (DHRCs) with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined (NOC) prostate cancer in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2016), we identified 12961 RP and PLDN patients with at least one DHRC. We relied on descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 12 961 patients, 6135 (47%) exclusively harboured biopsy Gleason score (GS) 8–10, 3526 (27%) had clinical stage ≥T2c, and 1234 (9.5%) had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/mL. Only 1886 (15%) harboured any combination of 2 DHRCs. Finally, all 3 DHRCs were present in 180 (1.4%) patients. NOC rates increased from 32% for clinical T stage ≥T2c to 49% for either GS 8–10 only or PSA >20 ng/mL only and to 66–68% for any combination of 2 DHRCs, and to 84% for respectively all 3 DHRCs, which resulted in a multivariable logistic regression OR of 1.00, 2.01 (95% CI 1.85–2.19; p <0.001), 4.16 (95% CI 3.69–4.68; p <0.001), and 10.83 (95% CI 7.35–16.52; p <0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates a stimulus-response effect according to the type and number of DHRCs. Hence, a formal risk-stratification within high-risk prostate cancer patients should be considered in clinical decision-making. Polish Urological Association 2023-04-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10357822/ /pubmed/37483849 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.030 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Chierigo, Francesco Flammia, Rocco Simone Sorce, Gabriele Hoeh, Benedikt Hohenhorst, Lukas Tian, Zhe Saad, Fred Gallucci, Michele Briganti, Alberto Montorsi, Francesco Chun, Felix K.H. Graefen, Markus Shariat, Shahrokh F. Guano, Giovanni Mantica, Guglielmo Borghesi, Marco Suardi, Nazareno Terrone, Carlo Karakiewicz, Pierre I. The association of the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer |
title | The association of the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer |
title_full | The association of the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | The association of the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The association of the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer |
title_short | The association of the type and number of D’Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer |
title_sort | association of the type and number of d’amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483849 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chierigofrancesco theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT flammiaroccosimone theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT sorcegabriele theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT hoehbenedikt theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT hohenhorstlukas theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT tianzhe theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT saadfred theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT galluccimichele theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT brigantialberto theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT montorsifrancesco theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT chunfelixkh theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT graefenmarkus theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT shariatshahrokhf theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT guanogiovanni theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT manticaguglielmo theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT borghesimarco theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT suardinazareno theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT terronecarlo theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT karakiewiczpierrei theassociationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT chierigofrancesco associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT flammiaroccosimone associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT sorcegabriele associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT hoehbenedikt associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT hohenhorstlukas associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT tianzhe associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT saadfred associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT galluccimichele associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT brigantialberto associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT montorsifrancesco associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT chunfelixkh associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT graefenmarkus associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT shariatshahrokhf associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT guanogiovanni associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT manticaguglielmo associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT borghesimarco associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT suardinazareno associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT terronecarlo associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer AT karakiewiczpierrei associationofthetypeandnumberofdamicohighriskcriteriawithratesofpathologicallynonorganconfinedprostatecancer |