Cargando…
The Utility of EBUS-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy With or Without an Electrocautery Knife for the Diagnosis of Mediastinal and Hilar Lymphadenopathy
Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been shown to have a high diagnostic yield for mediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling, particularly in diagnosing and staging non-small cell lung cancer. However, the diagnostic yield is lower in patien...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37485133 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40684 |
Sumario: | Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been shown to have a high diagnostic yield for mediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling, particularly in diagnosing and staging non-small cell lung cancer. However, the diagnostic yield is lower in patients with granulomatous and lymphoproliferative disorders. We prospectively compared the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of EBUS-guided lymph node forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB) with electrocautery knife compared to EBUS-TBNA of lymph nodes in patients with suspected granulomatous and lymphoproliferative disease. Methods: Patients over 18 years of age with mediastinal/hilar lymph node >10 mm in size in short axis (on CT chest) who had suspected sarcoidosis/lymphoma radiologically/clinically were included in the study. Patients had EBUS-TBNA first with 21 or 22G needles which were followed by biopsy of the node with small forceps (EBUS-TBFB) through the same aspiration site to obtain samples. Electrocautery knife at 20W was used in patients where mucosal penetration was difficult, followed by passage of forceps through that site. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 25 patients underwent EBUS-TBFB. Eight patients had a history of lymphoma, one patient had history of squamous cell carcinoma, and one patient had history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. A 22 gauge needle was used for aspiration in all the cases that were performed, and 1.5 mm or 1.8 mm forceps were used for the biopsy. The use of electrocautery knife at 20W (Olympus America Inc.) was required in 10/25 patients. The EC knife allowed all 10 of those to have successful entry of forceps into the lymph node. The cytology (aspiration from EBUS needle) and histopathology (from forceps) were concordant in 17 patients while it was discordant in eight patients. One patient developed pneumomediastinum after needle and forceps biopsy that required no intervention. Conclusion: EBUS-guided forceps biopsy is a safe procedure. EC knife did successfully allow forceps entry into the lymph node in all EC knife procedures. The diagnostic yield was 73% (22/30) which improved to 86% (26/30) when both techniques were combined (TBNA and TBFB). |
---|