Cargando…

Diagnostic value of high‐risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer, and a tool more sensitive than cytology for the early screening of cervical precancers. The two most carcinogenic genotypes HPV 16/18 have been reported in the majority of studies. High‐risk HPVs other than HPV 16/18 (no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Anying, Xue, Peng, Li, Qing, Jiang, Yu, Qiao, Youlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37199394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6109
_version_ 1785075612210167808
author Bai, Anying
Xue, Peng
Li, Qing
Jiang, Yu
Qiao, Youlin
author_facet Bai, Anying
Xue, Peng
Li, Qing
Jiang, Yu
Qiao, Youlin
author_sort Bai, Anying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer, and a tool more sensitive than cytology for the early screening of cervical precancers. The two most carcinogenic genotypes HPV 16/18 have been reported in the majority of studies. High‐risk HPVs other than HPV 16/18 (non‐16/18‐hrHPVs) cause approximately a quarter of cervical cancers, and we aimed to analyze the genotype‐specific prevalence, risk and diagnostic efficiency of non‐16/18‐hrHPVs in cervical carcinogenesis among Chinese cytology‐negative women. METHODS: A total of 7043 females who had abnormal cervical testing results from January 2018 to October 2021 were enrolled, among them 3091 were cytology‐negative. Descriptive statistics was used to estimate the HPV genotype‐specific prevalence, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the genotype‐specific non‐16/18 hrHPVs risk of cervical carcinogenesis. The evaluation of diagnostic value among HPV genotypes included the possibility of predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or worse (CIN2+/CIN3+) and the diagnostic efficiency measured by increased referral rate and referral numbers of colposcopies per additional CIN2+/CIN3+ detected. RESULTS: Among HPV‐positive cytology‐negative women, the five dominant genotypes for CIN2+/CIN3+ were HPV 31/33/35/52/58. HPV 52/58/33 had comparatively high sensitivity and specificity in predicting CIN2+/CIN3+, while the referral strategy of multiple HPV58 required 26 colposcopies to detect 1 CIN3+, compared with 14, 12, and 8 required by multiple HPV52, 31, and 33, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HPV31/33/35/52/58 infections are significant risk factors for cervical lesions, and multiple HPV 31/33/52 infections should be included in the previously recommended HPV16/18 genotyping triage for colposcopy in China, as the benefits of disease prevention may outweigh the disadvantages of increasing requirements for colposcopy services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10358197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103581972023-07-21 Diagnostic value of high‐risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: A multicenter retrospective study Bai, Anying Xue, Peng Li, Qing Jiang, Yu Qiao, Youlin Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer, and a tool more sensitive than cytology for the early screening of cervical precancers. The two most carcinogenic genotypes HPV 16/18 have been reported in the majority of studies. High‐risk HPVs other than HPV 16/18 (non‐16/18‐hrHPVs) cause approximately a quarter of cervical cancers, and we aimed to analyze the genotype‐specific prevalence, risk and diagnostic efficiency of non‐16/18‐hrHPVs in cervical carcinogenesis among Chinese cytology‐negative women. METHODS: A total of 7043 females who had abnormal cervical testing results from January 2018 to October 2021 were enrolled, among them 3091 were cytology‐negative. Descriptive statistics was used to estimate the HPV genotype‐specific prevalence, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the genotype‐specific non‐16/18 hrHPVs risk of cervical carcinogenesis. The evaluation of diagnostic value among HPV genotypes included the possibility of predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or worse (CIN2+/CIN3+) and the diagnostic efficiency measured by increased referral rate and referral numbers of colposcopies per additional CIN2+/CIN3+ detected. RESULTS: Among HPV‐positive cytology‐negative women, the five dominant genotypes for CIN2+/CIN3+ were HPV 31/33/35/52/58. HPV 52/58/33 had comparatively high sensitivity and specificity in predicting CIN2+/CIN3+, while the referral strategy of multiple HPV58 required 26 colposcopies to detect 1 CIN3+, compared with 14, 12, and 8 required by multiple HPV52, 31, and 33, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HPV31/33/35/52/58 infections are significant risk factors for cervical lesions, and multiple HPV 31/33/52 infections should be included in the previously recommended HPV16/18 genotyping triage for colposcopy in China, as the benefits of disease prevention may outweigh the disadvantages of increasing requirements for colposcopy services. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10358197/ /pubmed/37199394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6109 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Bai, Anying
Xue, Peng
Li, Qing
Jiang, Yu
Qiao, Youlin
Diagnostic value of high‐risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: A multicenter retrospective study
title Diagnostic value of high‐risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: A multicenter retrospective study
title_full Diagnostic value of high‐risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: A multicenter retrospective study
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of high‐risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: A multicenter retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of high‐risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: A multicenter retrospective study
title_short Diagnostic value of high‐risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: A multicenter retrospective study
title_sort diagnostic value of high‐risk hpv other than type 16/18 in high‐grade cervical neoplasia among cytology‐negative women: a multicenter retrospective study
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37199394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6109
work_keys_str_mv AT baianying diagnosticvalueofhighriskhpvotherthantype1618inhighgradecervicalneoplasiaamongcytologynegativewomenamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT xuepeng diagnosticvalueofhighriskhpvotherthantype1618inhighgradecervicalneoplasiaamongcytologynegativewomenamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT liqing diagnosticvalueofhighriskhpvotherthantype1618inhighgradecervicalneoplasiaamongcytologynegativewomenamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT jiangyu diagnosticvalueofhighriskhpvotherthantype1618inhighgradecervicalneoplasiaamongcytologynegativewomenamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT qiaoyoulin diagnosticvalueofhighriskhpvotherthantype1618inhighgradecervicalneoplasiaamongcytologynegativewomenamulticenterretrospectivestudy