Cargando…

Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive mesenchymal neoplasm associated with a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is the standard therapy for patients with uLMS. However, it is unclear which treatment regimen results in the most favorable clinical outcome. We performed a meta‐analysis and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ijaz, Iqra, Shahzad, Muhammad Naveed, Hosseinifard, Hossein, Liu, Shuya, Sefidan, Masoud Ostadi, Kahloon, Lubna Ejaz, Imani, Saber, Hua, Zhong, Zhang, Yu Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5930
_version_ 1785075624201682944
author Ijaz, Iqra
Shahzad, Muhammad Naveed
Hosseinifard, Hossein
Liu, Shuya
Sefidan, Masoud Ostadi
Kahloon, Lubna Ejaz
Imani, Saber
Hua, Zhong
Zhang, Yu Qin
author_facet Ijaz, Iqra
Shahzad, Muhammad Naveed
Hosseinifard, Hossein
Liu, Shuya
Sefidan, Masoud Ostadi
Kahloon, Lubna Ejaz
Imani, Saber
Hua, Zhong
Zhang, Yu Qin
author_sort Ijaz, Iqra
collection PubMed
description Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive mesenchymal neoplasm associated with a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is the standard therapy for patients with uLMS. However, it is unclear which treatment regimen results in the most favorable clinical outcome. We performed a meta‐analysis and meta‐regression analysis to assess the efficiency of different treatments received by patients with advanced, metastatic, and relapsing uLMS by evaluating the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) as primary endpoints. The frequentist random effects meta‐analysis model was used to compare the outcomes of different treatment regimens for advanced uLMS. A meta‐regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between the study‐specific hazard ratios and specific demographic variables. A meta‐analysis of 51 reports including 1664 patients was conducted. Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (916 patients; 55%), gemcitabine and docetaxel were the most frequently used drugs. First‐line monotherapy with alkylating agents (pooled ORR = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–0.52) and second‐line monotherapy with protein kinase inhibitors (pooled ORR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.39–0.52) resulted in favorable prognoses. The combinations of anthracycline plus alkylating therapy (pooled DCR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67–0.79) and of gemcitabine plus docetaxel (pooled DCR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.63–0.75) showed the greatest benefits when used as first‐line and second‐line chemotherapies, respectively. Subgroup meta‐analysis results revealed that dual‐regimen therapies comprising anthracycline plus alkylating therapy and gemcitabine plus docetaxel are practical therapeutic choices for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages III–IVb with distant metastases when assessed by computed tomography (p = 0.001). Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and local radiotherapy resulted in favorable outcomes for patients with earlier stages of distant relapsed uLMS (p < 0.001). Our findings provide a basis for designing new therapeutic strategies and can potentially guide clinical practice toward better prognoses for uLMS patients with advanced, metastatic, and relapsing disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10358251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103582512023-07-21 Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis Ijaz, Iqra Shahzad, Muhammad Naveed Hosseinifard, Hossein Liu, Shuya Sefidan, Masoud Ostadi Kahloon, Lubna Ejaz Imani, Saber Hua, Zhong Zhang, Yu Qin Cancer Med REVIEW Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive mesenchymal neoplasm associated with a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is the standard therapy for patients with uLMS. However, it is unclear which treatment regimen results in the most favorable clinical outcome. We performed a meta‐analysis and meta‐regression analysis to assess the efficiency of different treatments received by patients with advanced, metastatic, and relapsing uLMS by evaluating the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) as primary endpoints. The frequentist random effects meta‐analysis model was used to compare the outcomes of different treatment regimens for advanced uLMS. A meta‐regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between the study‐specific hazard ratios and specific demographic variables. A meta‐analysis of 51 reports including 1664 patients was conducted. Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (916 patients; 55%), gemcitabine and docetaxel were the most frequently used drugs. First‐line monotherapy with alkylating agents (pooled ORR = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–0.52) and second‐line monotherapy with protein kinase inhibitors (pooled ORR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.39–0.52) resulted in favorable prognoses. The combinations of anthracycline plus alkylating therapy (pooled DCR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67–0.79) and of gemcitabine plus docetaxel (pooled DCR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.63–0.75) showed the greatest benefits when used as first‐line and second‐line chemotherapies, respectively. Subgroup meta‐analysis results revealed that dual‐regimen therapies comprising anthracycline plus alkylating therapy and gemcitabine plus docetaxel are practical therapeutic choices for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages III–IVb with distant metastases when assessed by computed tomography (p = 0.001). Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and local radiotherapy resulted in favorable outcomes for patients with earlier stages of distant relapsed uLMS (p < 0.001). Our findings provide a basis for designing new therapeutic strategies and can potentially guide clinical practice toward better prognoses for uLMS patients with advanced, metastatic, and relapsing disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10358251/ /pubmed/37081717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5930 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle REVIEW
Ijaz, Iqra
Shahzad, Muhammad Naveed
Hosseinifard, Hossein
Liu, Shuya
Sefidan, Masoud Ostadi
Kahloon, Lubna Ejaz
Imani, Saber
Hua, Zhong
Zhang, Yu Qin
Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis
title Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis
title_full Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis
title_short Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: a systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression analysis
topic REVIEW
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5930
work_keys_str_mv AT ijaziqra evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT shahzadmuhammadnaveed evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT hosseinifardhossein evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT liushuya evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT sefidanmasoudostadi evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT kahloonlubnaejaz evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT imanisaber evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT huazhong evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis
AT zhangyuqin evaluationoftheefficacyofsystemictherapyforadvanceduterineleiomyosarcomaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregressionanalysis