Cargando…

Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics

BACKGROUND: The twenty first century is often defined as the era of Artificial Intelligence (AI), which raises many questions regarding its impact on society. It is already significantly changing many practices in different fields. Research ethics (RE) is no exception. Many challenges, including res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouhouita-Guermech, Sarah, Gogognon, Patrick, Bélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1149082
_version_ 1785075644254650368
author Bouhouita-Guermech, Sarah
Gogognon, Patrick
Bélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe
author_facet Bouhouita-Guermech, Sarah
Gogognon, Patrick
Bélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe
author_sort Bouhouita-Guermech, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The twenty first century is often defined as the era of Artificial Intelligence (AI), which raises many questions regarding its impact on society. It is already significantly changing many practices in different fields. Research ethics (RE) is no exception. Many challenges, including responsibility, privacy, and transparency, are encountered. Research ethics boards (REB) have been established to ensure that ethical practices are adequately followed during research projects. This scoping review aims to bring out the challenges of AI in research ethics and to investigate if REBs are equipped to evaluate them. METHODS: Three electronic databases were selected to collect peer-reviewed articles that fit the inclusion criteria (English or French, published between 2016 and 2021, containing AI, RE, and REB). Two instigators independently reviewed each piece by screening with Covidence and then coding with NVivo. RESULTS: From having a total of 657 articles to review, we were left with a final sample of 28 relevant papers for our scoping review. The selected literature described AI in research ethics (i.e., views on current guidelines, key ethical concept and approaches, key issues of the current state of AI-specific RE guidelines) and REBs regarding AI (i.e., their roles, scope and approaches, key practices and processes, limitations and challenges, stakeholder perceptions). However, the literature often described REBs ethical assessment practices of projects in AI research as lacking knowledge and tools. CONCLUSION: Ethical reflections are taking a step forward while normative guidelines adaptation to AI's reality is still dawdling. This impacts REBs and most stakeholders involved with AI. Indeed, REBs are not equipped enough to adequately evaluate AI research ethics and require standard guidelines to help them do so.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10358356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103583562023-07-21 Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics Bouhouita-Guermech, Sarah Gogognon, Patrick Bélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence BACKGROUND: The twenty first century is often defined as the era of Artificial Intelligence (AI), which raises many questions regarding its impact on society. It is already significantly changing many practices in different fields. Research ethics (RE) is no exception. Many challenges, including responsibility, privacy, and transparency, are encountered. Research ethics boards (REB) have been established to ensure that ethical practices are adequately followed during research projects. This scoping review aims to bring out the challenges of AI in research ethics and to investigate if REBs are equipped to evaluate them. METHODS: Three electronic databases were selected to collect peer-reviewed articles that fit the inclusion criteria (English or French, published between 2016 and 2021, containing AI, RE, and REB). Two instigators independently reviewed each piece by screening with Covidence and then coding with NVivo. RESULTS: From having a total of 657 articles to review, we were left with a final sample of 28 relevant papers for our scoping review. The selected literature described AI in research ethics (i.e., views on current guidelines, key ethical concept and approaches, key issues of the current state of AI-specific RE guidelines) and REBs regarding AI (i.e., their roles, scope and approaches, key practices and processes, limitations and challenges, stakeholder perceptions). However, the literature often described REBs ethical assessment practices of projects in AI research as lacking knowledge and tools. CONCLUSION: Ethical reflections are taking a step forward while normative guidelines adaptation to AI's reality is still dawdling. This impacts REBs and most stakeholders involved with AI. Indeed, REBs are not equipped enough to adequately evaluate AI research ethics and require standard guidelines to help them do so. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10358356/ /pubmed/37483869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1149082 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bouhouita-Guermech, Gogognon and Bélisle-Pipon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Bouhouita-Guermech, Sarah
Gogognon, Patrick
Bélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe
Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics
title Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics
title_full Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics
title_fullStr Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics
title_full_unstemmed Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics
title_short Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics
title_sort specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37483869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1149082
work_keys_str_mv AT bouhouitaguermechsarah specificchallengesposedbyartificialintelligenceinresearchethics
AT gogognonpatrick specificchallengesposedbyartificialintelligenceinresearchethics
AT belislepiponjeanchristophe specificchallengesposedbyartificialintelligenceinresearchethics