Cargando…

Arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: A biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in Atzei type II lesions

Several open and arthroscopic techniques for repair triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears have been used. The aim of this study, using a cadaveric model, was to compare the biomechanical resistance to the pronosupination movement of arthroscopic repair with anchor and pull-out techniques in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo, Ferreres, Angel, Rodríguez-Baeza, Alfonso, Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33720794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504211000888
_version_ 1785075670703931392
author Gutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo
Ferreres, Angel
Rodríguez-Baeza, Alfonso
Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor
author_facet Gutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo
Ferreres, Angel
Rodríguez-Baeza, Alfonso
Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor
author_sort Gutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo
collection PubMed
description Several open and arthroscopic techniques for repair triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears have been used. The aim of this study, using a cadaveric model, was to compare the biomechanical resistance to the pronosupination movement of arthroscopic repair with anchor and pull-out techniques in TFCC tears of Atzei type II lesions. Eighteen forearms of cadaveric specimens were evaluated arthroscopically, of which 12 were selected according to the inclusion criteria. All specimens were injured with an Atzei type II lesion and were repaired arthroscopically. Six forearms were repaired using the anchor technique and the other six with the pull-out technique. To assess the biomechanical resistance of the repair, the forearms were tested to 300 cycles of 160° pronosupination. Two evaluators independently assessed the repair status every 10 cycles and the modified Desai classification was used to verify the presence of failure. The mean failure of the repair occurred at 41.6 cycles (SD 7.5) for the pull-out technique and at 28.3 cycles (SD 9.8) for the anchor technique, showing a difference of 13.3 cycles (p = 0.025) in favor of the pull-out technique. In all cases, repair failure occurred at the junction of the fibrocartilage with the suture. Arthroscopic repair with the pull-out technique showed greater biomechanical resistance to pronosupination movement in comparison to the anchor technique. Interestingly, the failure of arthroscopic repair of Atzei type II lesions occurs at the junction between the suture and the fibrocartilage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10358480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103584802023-08-09 Arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: A biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in Atzei type II lesions Gutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo Ferreres, Angel Rodríguez-Baeza, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor Sci Prog Article Several open and arthroscopic techniques for repair triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears have been used. The aim of this study, using a cadaveric model, was to compare the biomechanical resistance to the pronosupination movement of arthroscopic repair with anchor and pull-out techniques in TFCC tears of Atzei type II lesions. Eighteen forearms of cadaveric specimens were evaluated arthroscopically, of which 12 were selected according to the inclusion criteria. All specimens were injured with an Atzei type II lesion and were repaired arthroscopically. Six forearms were repaired using the anchor technique and the other six with the pull-out technique. To assess the biomechanical resistance of the repair, the forearms were tested to 300 cycles of 160° pronosupination. Two evaluators independently assessed the repair status every 10 cycles and the modified Desai classification was used to verify the presence of failure. The mean failure of the repair occurred at 41.6 cycles (SD 7.5) for the pull-out technique and at 28.3 cycles (SD 9.8) for the anchor technique, showing a difference of 13.3 cycles (p = 0.025) in favor of the pull-out technique. In all cases, repair failure occurred at the junction of the fibrocartilage with the suture. Arthroscopic repair with the pull-out technique showed greater biomechanical resistance to pronosupination movement in comparison to the anchor technique. Interestingly, the failure of arthroscopic repair of Atzei type II lesions occurs at the junction between the suture and the fibrocartilage. SAGE Publications 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10358480/ /pubmed/33720794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504211000888 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Gutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo
Ferreres, Angel
Rodríguez-Baeza, Alfonso
Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor
Arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: A biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in Atzei type II lesions
title Arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: A biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in Atzei type II lesions
title_full Arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: A biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in Atzei type II lesions
title_fullStr Arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: A biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in Atzei type II lesions
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: A biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in Atzei type II lesions
title_short Arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: A biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in Atzei type II lesions
title_sort arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair: a biomechanical comparison of anchor and pull-out techniques in atzei type ii lesions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33720794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504211000888
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezmonclusrodrigo arthroscopictriangularfibrocartilagecomplexrepairabiomechanicalcomparisonofanchorandpullouttechniquesinatzeitypeiilesions
AT ferreresangel arthroscopictriangularfibrocartilagecomplexrepairabiomechanicalcomparisonofanchorandpullouttechniquesinatzeitypeiilesions
AT rodriguezbaezaalfonso arthroscopictriangularfibrocartilagecomplexrepairabiomechanicalcomparisonofanchorandpullouttechniquesinatzeitypeiilesions
AT gutierrezespinozahector arthroscopictriangularfibrocartilagecomplexrepairabiomechanicalcomparisonofanchorandpullouttechniquesinatzeitypeiilesions