Cargando…

Animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review

The aim of this review is to present and compare the various animal models of vascularized nerve grafts described in the literature as well as to summarize preclinical evidence for superior functional results compared to non-vascularized free nerve grafts. We also will present the state of the art o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toia, Francesca, Matta, Daniele, De Michele, Federico, Pirrello, Roberto, Cordova, Adriana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449598
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.358604
_version_ 1785075719133462528
author Toia, Francesca
Matta, Daniele
De Michele, Federico
Pirrello, Roberto
Cordova, Adriana
author_facet Toia, Francesca
Matta, Daniele
De Michele, Federico
Pirrello, Roberto
Cordova, Adriana
author_sort Toia, Francesca
collection PubMed
description The aim of this review is to present and compare the various animal models of vascularized nerve grafts described in the literature as well as to summarize preclinical evidence for superior functional results compared to non-vascularized free nerve grafts. We also will present the state of the art on prefabricated vascularized nerve grafts. A systematic literature review on vascularized nerve graft models was conducted via the retrieval with the PubMed database on March 30, 2019. Data on the animal, nerve, and vascularization model, the recipient bed, the evaluation time points and methods, and the results of the study results were extracted and analyzed from selected articles. The rat sciatic nerve was the most popular model for vascularized nerve grafts, followed by the rabbit; however, rabbit models allow for longer nerve grafts, which are suitable for translational evaluation, and produced more cautious results on the superiority of vascularized nerve grafts. Compared to free nerve grafts, vascularized nerve grafts have better early but similar long-term results, especially in an avascular bed. There are few studies on avascular receiving beds and prefabricated nerve grafts. The clinical translation potential of available animal models is limited, and current experimental knowledge cannot fully support that the differences between vascularized nerve grafts and free nerve grafts yield a clinical advantage that justifies the complexity of the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10358682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103586822023-07-21 Animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review Toia, Francesca Matta, Daniele De Michele, Federico Pirrello, Roberto Cordova, Adriana Neural Regen Res Review The aim of this review is to present and compare the various animal models of vascularized nerve grafts described in the literature as well as to summarize preclinical evidence for superior functional results compared to non-vascularized free nerve grafts. We also will present the state of the art on prefabricated vascularized nerve grafts. A systematic literature review on vascularized nerve graft models was conducted via the retrieval with the PubMed database on March 30, 2019. Data on the animal, nerve, and vascularization model, the recipient bed, the evaluation time points and methods, and the results of the study results were extracted and analyzed from selected articles. The rat sciatic nerve was the most popular model for vascularized nerve grafts, followed by the rabbit; however, rabbit models allow for longer nerve grafts, which are suitable for translational evaluation, and produced more cautious results on the superiority of vascularized nerve grafts. Compared to free nerve grafts, vascularized nerve grafts have better early but similar long-term results, especially in an avascular bed. There are few studies on avascular receiving beds and prefabricated nerve grafts. The clinical translation potential of available animal models is limited, and current experimental knowledge cannot fully support that the differences between vascularized nerve grafts and free nerve grafts yield a clinical advantage that justifies the complexity of the procedure. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10358682/ /pubmed/37449598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.358604 Text en Copyright: © Neural Regeneration Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review
Toia, Francesca
Matta, Daniele
De Michele, Federico
Pirrello, Roberto
Cordova, Adriana
Animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review
title Animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review
title_full Animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review
title_fullStr Animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review
title_short Animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review
title_sort animal models of vascularized nerve grafts: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449598
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.358604
work_keys_str_mv AT toiafrancesca animalmodelsofvascularizednervegraftsasystematicreview
AT mattadaniele animalmodelsofvascularizednervegraftsasystematicreview
AT demichelefederico animalmodelsofvascularizednervegraftsasystematicreview
AT pirrelloroberto animalmodelsofvascularizednervegraftsasystematicreview
AT cordovaadriana animalmodelsofvascularizednervegraftsasystematicreview