Cargando…

Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom

We present a study of emotional reactions to climate change utilizing representative samples from France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom (UK). Drawing on appraisal theories of emotion, we examine relations between appraisals, emotions, and behavioral intentions in the context of climate cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böhm, Gisela, Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger, Doran, Rouven, Ogunbode, Charles A., Poortinga, Wouter, Tvinnereim, Endre, Steentjes, Katharine, Mays, Claire, Bertoldo, Raquel, Sonnberger, Marco, Pidgeon, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139133
_version_ 1785075751572209664
author Böhm, Gisela
Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger
Doran, Rouven
Ogunbode, Charles A.
Poortinga, Wouter
Tvinnereim, Endre
Steentjes, Katharine
Mays, Claire
Bertoldo, Raquel
Sonnberger, Marco
Pidgeon, Nicholas
author_facet Böhm, Gisela
Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger
Doran, Rouven
Ogunbode, Charles A.
Poortinga, Wouter
Tvinnereim, Endre
Steentjes, Katharine
Mays, Claire
Bertoldo, Raquel
Sonnberger, Marco
Pidgeon, Nicholas
author_sort Böhm, Gisela
collection PubMed
description We present a study of emotional reactions to climate change utilizing representative samples from France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom (UK). Drawing on appraisal theories of emotion, we examine relations between appraisals, emotions, and behavioral intentions in the context of climate change. We compare the four countries concerning emotional differences and commonalities and relate our findings to pertinent models of cultural values. Five distinct emotions were measured: worry, hope, fear, outrage, and guilt. In addition, the survey asked respondents to appraise a set of climate-related statements, such as the causality of climate change, or the efficacy of mitigation efforts. Also, a set of climate-relevant actions, such as willingness to reduce energy consumption or support for climate policies, was assessed. Findings show that appraisals of human causation and moral concern were associated with worry and outrage, and appraisals of efficacy and technological solutions were associated with hope. Worry and outrage are associated with intentions to reduce one’s energy consumption, whereas hope and guilt are related to support for policies such as tax and price increases. A country comparison shows that French respondents score high on outrage and worry and tend to engage in individual behaviors to mitigate climate change, whereas Norwegian respondents score high on hope and show a tendency to support policies of cost increase. Generally, worry is the most and guilt the least intense emotion. Moral concerns and perceived collective efficacy of one’s country in addressing climate change are relatively strong in France, while beliefs in human causation and in negative impacts of climate change prevail in Germany, and confidence in technological solutions are prevalent in Norway. In sum, findings reveal typical patterns of emotional responses in the four countries and confirm systematic associations between emotions and appraisals as well as between emotions and behaviors. Relating these findings to models of cultural values reveals that Norway, endorsing secular and egalitarian values, is characterized by hope and confidence in technological solutions, whereas France and Germany, emphasizing relatively more hierarchical and traditional values, are rather characterized by fear, outrage, and support for behavioral restrictions imposed by climate change policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10358841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103588412023-07-21 Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom Böhm, Gisela Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger Doran, Rouven Ogunbode, Charles A. Poortinga, Wouter Tvinnereim, Endre Steentjes, Katharine Mays, Claire Bertoldo, Raquel Sonnberger, Marco Pidgeon, Nicholas Front Psychol Psychology We present a study of emotional reactions to climate change utilizing representative samples from France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom (UK). Drawing on appraisal theories of emotion, we examine relations between appraisals, emotions, and behavioral intentions in the context of climate change. We compare the four countries concerning emotional differences and commonalities and relate our findings to pertinent models of cultural values. Five distinct emotions were measured: worry, hope, fear, outrage, and guilt. In addition, the survey asked respondents to appraise a set of climate-related statements, such as the causality of climate change, or the efficacy of mitigation efforts. Also, a set of climate-relevant actions, such as willingness to reduce energy consumption or support for climate policies, was assessed. Findings show that appraisals of human causation and moral concern were associated with worry and outrage, and appraisals of efficacy and technological solutions were associated with hope. Worry and outrage are associated with intentions to reduce one’s energy consumption, whereas hope and guilt are related to support for policies such as tax and price increases. A country comparison shows that French respondents score high on outrage and worry and tend to engage in individual behaviors to mitigate climate change, whereas Norwegian respondents score high on hope and show a tendency to support policies of cost increase. Generally, worry is the most and guilt the least intense emotion. Moral concerns and perceived collective efficacy of one’s country in addressing climate change are relatively strong in France, while beliefs in human causation and in negative impacts of climate change prevail in Germany, and confidence in technological solutions are prevalent in Norway. In sum, findings reveal typical patterns of emotional responses in the four countries and confirm systematic associations between emotions and appraisals as well as between emotions and behaviors. Relating these findings to models of cultural values reveals that Norway, endorsing secular and egalitarian values, is characterized by hope and confidence in technological solutions, whereas France and Germany, emphasizing relatively more hierarchical and traditional values, are rather characterized by fear, outrage, and support for behavioral restrictions imposed by climate change policies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10358841/ /pubmed/37484093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139133 Text en Copyright © 2023 Böhm, Pfister, Doran, Ogunbode, Poortinga, Tvinnereim, Steentjes, Mays, Bertoldo, Sonnberger and Pidgeon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Böhm, Gisela
Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger
Doran, Rouven
Ogunbode, Charles A.
Poortinga, Wouter
Tvinnereim, Endre
Steentjes, Katharine
Mays, Claire
Bertoldo, Raquel
Sonnberger, Marco
Pidgeon, Nicholas
Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom
title Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom
title_full Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom
title_short Emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom
title_sort emotional reactions to climate change: a comparison across france, germany, norway, and the united kingdom
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139133
work_keys_str_mv AT bohmgisela emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT pfisterhansrudiger emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT doranrouven emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT ogunbodecharlesa emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT poortingawouter emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT tvinnereimendre emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT steentjeskatharine emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT maysclaire emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT bertoldoraquel emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT sonnbergermarco emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom
AT pidgeonnicholas emotionalreactionstoclimatechangeacomparisonacrossfrancegermanynorwayandtheunitedkingdom