Cargando…

Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015–2020

BACKGROUND: Participation in bowel cancer screening programs remains poor in many countries. Knowledge of geographical variation in participation rates may help design targeted interventions to improve uptake. This study describes small-area and broad geographical patterns in bowel screening partici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dasgupta, Paramita, Cameron, Jessica K., Goodwin, Belinda, Cramb, Susanna M., Mengersen, Kerrie, Aitken, Joanne F., Baade, Peter D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37471422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288992
_version_ 1785075770688798720
author Dasgupta, Paramita
Cameron, Jessica K.
Goodwin, Belinda
Cramb, Susanna M.
Mengersen, Kerrie
Aitken, Joanne F.
Baade, Peter D.
author_facet Dasgupta, Paramita
Cameron, Jessica K.
Goodwin, Belinda
Cramb, Susanna M.
Mengersen, Kerrie
Aitken, Joanne F.
Baade, Peter D.
author_sort Dasgupta, Paramita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Participation in bowel cancer screening programs remains poor in many countries. Knowledge of geographical variation in participation rates may help design targeted interventions to improve uptake. This study describes small-area and broad geographical patterns in bowel screening participation in Australia between 2015–2020. METHODS: Publicly available population-level participation data for Australia’s National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) were modelled using generalized linear models to quantify screening patterns by remoteness and area-level disadvantage. Bayesian spatial models were used to obtain smoothed estimates of participation across 2,247 small areas during 2019–2020 compared to the national average, and during 2015–2016 and 2017–2018 for comparison. Spatial heterogeneity was assessed using the maximized excess events test. RESULTS: Overall, screening participation rates was around 44% over the three time-periods. Participation was consistently lower in remote or disadvantaged areas, although heterogeneity was evident within these broad categories. There was strong evidence of spatial differences in participation over all three periods, with little change in patterns between time periods. If the spatial variation was reduced (so low participation areas were increased to the 80th centile), an extra 250,000 screens (4% of total) would have been conducted during 2019–2020. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having a well-structured evidence-based government funded national bowel cancer screening program, the substantial spatial variation in participation rates highlights the importance of accounting for the unique characteristics of specific geographical regions and their inhabitants. Identifying the reasons for geographical disparities could inform interventions to achieve more equitable access and a higher overall bowel screening uptake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10358922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103589222023-07-21 Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015–2020 Dasgupta, Paramita Cameron, Jessica K. Goodwin, Belinda Cramb, Susanna M. Mengersen, Kerrie Aitken, Joanne F. Baade, Peter D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Participation in bowel cancer screening programs remains poor in many countries. Knowledge of geographical variation in participation rates may help design targeted interventions to improve uptake. This study describes small-area and broad geographical patterns in bowel screening participation in Australia between 2015–2020. METHODS: Publicly available population-level participation data for Australia’s National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) were modelled using generalized linear models to quantify screening patterns by remoteness and area-level disadvantage. Bayesian spatial models were used to obtain smoothed estimates of participation across 2,247 small areas during 2019–2020 compared to the national average, and during 2015–2016 and 2017–2018 for comparison. Spatial heterogeneity was assessed using the maximized excess events test. RESULTS: Overall, screening participation rates was around 44% over the three time-periods. Participation was consistently lower in remote or disadvantaged areas, although heterogeneity was evident within these broad categories. There was strong evidence of spatial differences in participation over all three periods, with little change in patterns between time periods. If the spatial variation was reduced (so low participation areas were increased to the 80th centile), an extra 250,000 screens (4% of total) would have been conducted during 2019–2020. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having a well-structured evidence-based government funded national bowel cancer screening program, the substantial spatial variation in participation rates highlights the importance of accounting for the unique characteristics of specific geographical regions and their inhabitants. Identifying the reasons for geographical disparities could inform interventions to achieve more equitable access and a higher overall bowel screening uptake. Public Library of Science 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10358922/ /pubmed/37471422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288992 Text en © 2023 Dasgupta et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dasgupta, Paramita
Cameron, Jessica K.
Goodwin, Belinda
Cramb, Susanna M.
Mengersen, Kerrie
Aitken, Joanne F.
Baade, Peter D.
Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015–2020
title Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015–2020
title_full Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015–2020
title_fullStr Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015–2020
title_full_unstemmed Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015–2020
title_short Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015–2020
title_sort geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, australia, 2015–2020
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37471422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288992
work_keys_str_mv AT dasguptaparamita geographicalandspatialvariationsinbowelcancerscreeningparticipationaustralia20152020
AT cameronjessicak geographicalandspatialvariationsinbowelcancerscreeningparticipationaustralia20152020
AT goodwinbelinda geographicalandspatialvariationsinbowelcancerscreeningparticipationaustralia20152020
AT crambsusannam geographicalandspatialvariationsinbowelcancerscreeningparticipationaustralia20152020
AT mengersenkerrie geographicalandspatialvariationsinbowelcancerscreeningparticipationaustralia20152020
AT aitkenjoannef geographicalandspatialvariationsinbowelcancerscreeningparticipationaustralia20152020
AT baadepeterd geographicalandspatialvariationsinbowelcancerscreeningparticipationaustralia20152020