Cargando…

Purposeful listening in challenging conditions: A study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise

Prediction is often used during language comprehension. However, studies of prediction have tended to focus on L1 listeners in quiet conditions. Thus, it is unclear how listeners predict outside the laboratory and in specific communicative settings. Here, we report two eye-tracking studies which use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amos, Rhona M., Hartsuiker, Robert J., Seeber, Kilian G., Pickering, Martin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37471379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288960
_version_ 1785075791377203200
author Amos, Rhona M.
Hartsuiker, Robert J.
Seeber, Kilian G.
Pickering, Martin J.
author_facet Amos, Rhona M.
Hartsuiker, Robert J.
Seeber, Kilian G.
Pickering, Martin J.
author_sort Amos, Rhona M.
collection PubMed
description Prediction is often used during language comprehension. However, studies of prediction have tended to focus on L1 listeners in quiet conditions. Thus, it is unclear how listeners predict outside the laboratory and in specific communicative settings. Here, we report two eye-tracking studies which used a visual-world paradigm to investigate whether prediction during a consecutive interpreting task differs from prediction during a listening task in L2 listeners, and whether L2 listeners are able to predict in the noisy conditions that might be associated with this communicative setting. In a first study, thirty-six Dutch-English bilinguals either just listened to, or else listened to and then consecutively interpreted, predictable sentences presented on speech-shaped sound. In a second study, another thirty-six Dutch-English bilinguals carried out the same tasks in clear speech. Our results suggest that L2 listeners predict the meaning of upcoming words in noisy conditions. However, we did not find that predictive eye movements depended on task, nor that L2 listeners predicted upcoming word form. We also did not find a difference in predictive patterns when we compared our two studies. Thus, L2 listeners predict in noisy circumstances, supporting theories which posit that prediction regularly takes place in comprehension, but we did not find evidence that a subsequent production task or noise affects semantic prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10359016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103590162023-07-21 Purposeful listening in challenging conditions: A study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise Amos, Rhona M. Hartsuiker, Robert J. Seeber, Kilian G. Pickering, Martin J. PLoS One Research Article Prediction is often used during language comprehension. However, studies of prediction have tended to focus on L1 listeners in quiet conditions. Thus, it is unclear how listeners predict outside the laboratory and in specific communicative settings. Here, we report two eye-tracking studies which used a visual-world paradigm to investigate whether prediction during a consecutive interpreting task differs from prediction during a listening task in L2 listeners, and whether L2 listeners are able to predict in the noisy conditions that might be associated with this communicative setting. In a first study, thirty-six Dutch-English bilinguals either just listened to, or else listened to and then consecutively interpreted, predictable sentences presented on speech-shaped sound. In a second study, another thirty-six Dutch-English bilinguals carried out the same tasks in clear speech. Our results suggest that L2 listeners predict the meaning of upcoming words in noisy conditions. However, we did not find that predictive eye movements depended on task, nor that L2 listeners predicted upcoming word form. We also did not find a difference in predictive patterns when we compared our two studies. Thus, L2 listeners predict in noisy circumstances, supporting theories which posit that prediction regularly takes place in comprehension, but we did not find evidence that a subsequent production task or noise affects semantic prediction. Public Library of Science 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10359016/ /pubmed/37471379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288960 Text en © 2023 Amos et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Amos, Rhona M.
Hartsuiker, Robert J.
Seeber, Kilian G.
Pickering, Martin J.
Purposeful listening in challenging conditions: A study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise
title Purposeful listening in challenging conditions: A study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise
title_full Purposeful listening in challenging conditions: A study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise
title_fullStr Purposeful listening in challenging conditions: A study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise
title_full_unstemmed Purposeful listening in challenging conditions: A study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise
title_short Purposeful listening in challenging conditions: A study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise
title_sort purposeful listening in challenging conditions: a study of prediction during consecutive interpreting in noise
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37471379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288960
work_keys_str_mv AT amosrhonam purposefullisteninginchallengingconditionsastudyofpredictionduringconsecutiveinterpretinginnoise
AT hartsuikerrobertj purposefullisteninginchallengingconditionsastudyofpredictionduringconsecutiveinterpretinginnoise
AT seeberkiliang purposefullisteninginchallengingconditionsastudyofpredictionduringconsecutiveinterpretinginnoise
AT pickeringmartinj purposefullisteninginchallengingconditionsastudyofpredictionduringconsecutiveinterpretinginnoise