Cargando…
Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
PURPOSE: Didactic lectures are a commonly used educational tool during urology residency training. Recently, there has been a rapid introduction of online, collaborative didactics as a new model for resident teaching. The aim of this study is to determine which attributes of didactics education are...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1144092 |
_version_ | 1785075809808023552 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yi Spradling, Kyle Allen, Isabel Elaine Conti, Simon Hampson, Lindsay A. |
author_facet | Li, Yi Spradling, Kyle Allen, Isabel Elaine Conti, Simon Hampson, Lindsay A. |
author_sort | Li, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Didactic lectures are a commonly used educational tool during urology residency training. Recently, there has been a rapid introduction of online, collaborative didactics as a new model for resident teaching. The aim of this study is to determine which attributes of didactics education are most preferred by contemporary urology trainees. METHODS: Urology trainees were invited to complete an online choice-based exercise assessing combinations of four attributes associated with didactics education: mode of communication, learning style, presenter credentials, and curriculum design. The survey was distributed via social media platforms and the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics (COViD) website. A choice-based conjoint analysis was used to identify how the trainees valued different combinations of didactic education. RESULTS: Seventy-three trainees completed the conjoint analysis exercise. Mode of communication was rated as significantly more important than curriculum design (relative importance 28.6% vs. 19.9%). Overall, the majority preferred online/virtual presentations to in-person presentations. Respondents preferred national experts to faculty members from their local institutions, and preferred cased based lectures to didactics style lectures. A nationally standardized curriculum was also preferred over curriculum designed by local institutions. Finally, when segmented by level of training, there was increased preference for overall favored options as PGY year increased. CONCLUSION: This conjoint analysis shows clear preference by trainees for online, recorded didactics, nationally standardized with national experts, and preferably in a case-based format. Academic societies in urology and program directors should consider utilizing the shared experience of previously created collaborative online lectures in developing future didactic curriculum that can meet the needs of current trainees. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10359114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103591142023-07-21 Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis Li, Yi Spradling, Kyle Allen, Isabel Elaine Conti, Simon Hampson, Lindsay A. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: Didactic lectures are a commonly used educational tool during urology residency training. Recently, there has been a rapid introduction of online, collaborative didactics as a new model for resident teaching. The aim of this study is to determine which attributes of didactics education are most preferred by contemporary urology trainees. METHODS: Urology trainees were invited to complete an online choice-based exercise assessing combinations of four attributes associated with didactics education: mode of communication, learning style, presenter credentials, and curriculum design. The survey was distributed via social media platforms and the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics (COViD) website. A choice-based conjoint analysis was used to identify how the trainees valued different combinations of didactic education. RESULTS: Seventy-three trainees completed the conjoint analysis exercise. Mode of communication was rated as significantly more important than curriculum design (relative importance 28.6% vs. 19.9%). Overall, the majority preferred online/virtual presentations to in-person presentations. Respondents preferred national experts to faculty members from their local institutions, and preferred cased based lectures to didactics style lectures. A nationally standardized curriculum was also preferred over curriculum designed by local institutions. Finally, when segmented by level of training, there was increased preference for overall favored options as PGY year increased. CONCLUSION: This conjoint analysis shows clear preference by trainees for online, recorded didactics, nationally standardized with national experts, and preferably in a case-based format. Academic societies in urology and program directors should consider utilizing the shared experience of previously created collaborative online lectures in developing future didactic curriculum that can meet the needs of current trainees. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10359114/ /pubmed/37484852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1144092 Text en Copyright © 2023 Li, Spradling, Allen, Conti and Hampson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Li, Yi Spradling, Kyle Allen, Isabel Elaine Conti, Simon Hampson, Lindsay A. Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis |
title | Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1144092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyi evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis AT spradlingkyle evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis AT allenisabelelaine evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis AT contisimon evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis AT hampsonlindsaya evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis |