Cargando…

Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis

PURPOSE: Didactic lectures are a commonly used educational tool during urology residency training. Recently, there has been a rapid introduction of online, collaborative didactics as a new model for resident teaching. The aim of this study is to determine which attributes of didactics education are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yi, Spradling, Kyle, Allen, Isabel Elaine, Conti, Simon, Hampson, Lindsay A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484852
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1144092
_version_ 1785075809808023552
author Li, Yi
Spradling, Kyle
Allen, Isabel Elaine
Conti, Simon
Hampson, Lindsay A.
author_facet Li, Yi
Spradling, Kyle
Allen, Isabel Elaine
Conti, Simon
Hampson, Lindsay A.
author_sort Li, Yi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Didactic lectures are a commonly used educational tool during urology residency training. Recently, there has been a rapid introduction of online, collaborative didactics as a new model for resident teaching. The aim of this study is to determine which attributes of didactics education are most preferred by contemporary urology trainees. METHODS: Urology trainees were invited to complete an online choice-based exercise assessing combinations of four attributes associated with didactics education: mode of communication, learning style, presenter credentials, and curriculum design. The survey was distributed via social media platforms and the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics (COViD) website. A choice-based conjoint analysis was used to identify how the trainees valued different combinations of didactic education. RESULTS: Seventy-three trainees completed the conjoint analysis exercise. Mode of communication was rated as significantly more important than curriculum design (relative importance 28.6% vs. 19.9%). Overall, the majority preferred online/virtual presentations to in-person presentations. Respondents preferred national experts to faculty members from their local institutions, and preferred cased based lectures to didactics style lectures. A nationally standardized curriculum was also preferred over curriculum designed by local institutions. Finally, when segmented by level of training, there was increased preference for overall favored options as PGY year increased. CONCLUSION: This conjoint analysis shows clear preference by trainees for online, recorded didactics, nationally standardized with national experts, and preferably in a case-based format. Academic societies in urology and program directors should consider utilizing the shared experience of previously created collaborative online lectures in developing future didactic curriculum that can meet the needs of current trainees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10359114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103591142023-07-21 Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis Li, Yi Spradling, Kyle Allen, Isabel Elaine Conti, Simon Hampson, Lindsay A. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: Didactic lectures are a commonly used educational tool during urology residency training. Recently, there has been a rapid introduction of online, collaborative didactics as a new model for resident teaching. The aim of this study is to determine which attributes of didactics education are most preferred by contemporary urology trainees. METHODS: Urology trainees were invited to complete an online choice-based exercise assessing combinations of four attributes associated with didactics education: mode of communication, learning style, presenter credentials, and curriculum design. The survey was distributed via social media platforms and the Urology Collaborative Online Video Didactics (COViD) website. A choice-based conjoint analysis was used to identify how the trainees valued different combinations of didactic education. RESULTS: Seventy-three trainees completed the conjoint analysis exercise. Mode of communication was rated as significantly more important than curriculum design (relative importance 28.6% vs. 19.9%). Overall, the majority preferred online/virtual presentations to in-person presentations. Respondents preferred national experts to faculty members from their local institutions, and preferred cased based lectures to didactics style lectures. A nationally standardized curriculum was also preferred over curriculum designed by local institutions. Finally, when segmented by level of training, there was increased preference for overall favored options as PGY year increased. CONCLUSION: This conjoint analysis shows clear preference by trainees for online, recorded didactics, nationally standardized with national experts, and preferably in a case-based format. Academic societies in urology and program directors should consider utilizing the shared experience of previously created collaborative online lectures in developing future didactic curriculum that can meet the needs of current trainees. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10359114/ /pubmed/37484852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1144092 Text en Copyright © 2023 Li, Spradling, Allen, Conti and Hampson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Li, Yi
Spradling, Kyle
Allen, Isabel Elaine
Conti, Simon
Hampson, Lindsay A.
Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
title Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
title_full Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
title_short Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
title_sort evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484852
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1144092
work_keys_str_mv AT liyi evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis
AT spradlingkyle evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis
AT allenisabelelaine evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis
AT contisimon evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis
AT hampsonlindsaya evaluationofurologytraineepreferencesindidacticeducationachoicebasedconjointanalysis