Cargando…

Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labib, Krishma, Evans, Natalie, Pizzolato, Daniel, Aubert Bonn, Noémie, Widdershoven, Guy, Bouter, Lex, Konach, Teodora, Langendam, Miranda, Dierickx, Kris, Tijdink, Joeri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37470823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2
_version_ 1785075827607601152
author Labib, Krishma
Evans, Natalie
Pizzolato, Daniel
Aubert Bonn, Noémie
Widdershoven, Guy
Bouter, Lex
Konach, Teodora
Langendam, Miranda
Dierickx, Kris
Tijdink, Joeri
author_facet Labib, Krishma
Evans, Natalie
Pizzolato, Daniel
Aubert Bonn, Noémie
Widdershoven, Guy
Bouter, Lex
Konach, Teodora
Langendam, Miranda
Dierickx, Kris
Tijdink, Joeri
author_sort Labib, Krishma
collection PubMed
description To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We used an iterative co-creative process. We conducted four half-day online co-creation workshops with 16 participants in total, which were informed by the RI education evidence-base. In the first two workshops, participants generated ideas for guidelines’ content, focusing on different target groups and various approaches to RI education. Based on this content we developed first drafts of the guidelines. Participants in the third and fourth workshop refined those drafts. We next organized a working group which further prioritized, reorganized, and optimized the content of the guidelines. We developed four guidelines on RI education focusing on (a) bachelor, master and PhD students; (b) post-doctorate and senior researchers; (c) other RI stakeholders; as well as (d) continuous RI education. Across guidelines, we recommend mandatory RI training; follow-up refresher training; informal discussions about RI; appropriate rewards and incentives for active participation in RI education; and evaluation of RI educational events. Our work provides experience-based co-created guidance to research institutions on what to consider when developing a successful RI education strategy. Each guideline is offered as a distinct, publicly available tool in our toolbox (www.sops4ri.eu/toolbox) which institutions can access, adapt and implement to meet their institution-specific RI education needs. Trial registration https://osf.io/zej5b. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10359202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103592022023-07-22 Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions Labib, Krishma Evans, Natalie Pizzolato, Daniel Aubert Bonn, Noémie Widdershoven, Guy Bouter, Lex Konach, Teodora Langendam, Miranda Dierickx, Kris Tijdink, Joeri Sci Eng Ethics Original Research/Scholarship To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We used an iterative co-creative process. We conducted four half-day online co-creation workshops with 16 participants in total, which were informed by the RI education evidence-base. In the first two workshops, participants generated ideas for guidelines’ content, focusing on different target groups and various approaches to RI education. Based on this content we developed first drafts of the guidelines. Participants in the third and fourth workshop refined those drafts. We next organized a working group which further prioritized, reorganized, and optimized the content of the guidelines. We developed four guidelines on RI education focusing on (a) bachelor, master and PhD students; (b) post-doctorate and senior researchers; (c) other RI stakeholders; as well as (d) continuous RI education. Across guidelines, we recommend mandatory RI training; follow-up refresher training; informal discussions about RI; appropriate rewards and incentives for active participation in RI education; and evaluation of RI educational events. Our work provides experience-based co-created guidance to research institutions on what to consider when developing a successful RI education strategy. Each guideline is offered as a distinct, publicly available tool in our toolbox (www.sops4ri.eu/toolbox) which institutions can access, adapt and implement to meet their institution-specific RI education needs. Trial registration https://osf.io/zej5b. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2. Springer Netherlands 2023-07-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10359202/ /pubmed/37470823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research/Scholarship
Labib, Krishma
Evans, Natalie
Pizzolato, Daniel
Aubert Bonn, Noémie
Widdershoven, Guy
Bouter, Lex
Konach, Teodora
Langendam, Miranda
Dierickx, Kris
Tijdink, Joeri
Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions
title Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions
title_full Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions
title_fullStr Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions
title_full_unstemmed Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions
title_short Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions
title_sort co-creating research integrity education guidelines for research institutions
topic Original Research/Scholarship
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37470823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2
work_keys_str_mv AT labibkrishma cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT evansnatalie cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT pizzolatodaniel cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT aubertbonnnoemie cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT widdershovenguy cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT bouterlex cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT konachteodora cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT langendammiranda cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT dierickxkris cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions
AT tijdinkjoeri cocreatingresearchintegrityeducationguidelinesforresearchinstitutions