Cargando…

Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience

BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for a hiatus hernia is usually a high-risk procedure in acutely unwell patients. Common surgical techniques include reduction of the hernia, cruropexy then either fundoplication or gastropexy with a gastrostomy. This is an observational study in a tertiary referral cent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alasmar, Mohamed, McKechnie, Iona, Chaparala, Ramakrishna P. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01482-y
_version_ 1785075829460434944
author Alasmar, Mohamed
McKechnie, Iona
Chaparala, Ramakrishna P. C.
author_facet Alasmar, Mohamed
McKechnie, Iona
Chaparala, Ramakrishna P. C.
author_sort Alasmar, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for a hiatus hernia is usually a high-risk procedure in acutely unwell patients. Common surgical techniques include reduction of the hernia, cruropexy then either fundoplication or gastropexy with a gastrostomy. This is an observational study in a tertiary referral centre for complicated hiatus hernias to compare recurrence rates between these two techniques. METHODS: Eighty patients are included in this study, from October 2012 to November 2020. This is a retrospective review and analysis of their management and follow-up. Recurrence of the hiatus hernia that mandates surgical repair was the primary outcome of this study. Secondary outcomes include morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: In total, 38% of the patients included in the study had fundoplication procedures, 53% had gastropexy, 6% had complete or partial resection of the stomach, 3% had fundoplication and gastropexy and one patient had neither (n = 30, 42, 5, 2,1, respectively). Eight patients had symptomatic recurrence of the hernia which required surgical repair. Three of these patients had acute recurrence and 5 after discharge. 50% had undergone fundoplication, 38% underwent gastropexy and 13% underwent a resection (n = 4, 3, 1) (p value = 0.5). 38% of patient had no complications and 30-day mortality was 7.5% CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest single centre review of outcomes following emergency hiatus hernia repairs. Our results show that either fundoplication or gastropexy can be used safely to reduce the risk of recurrence in the emergency setting. Therefore, surgical technique can be tailored based on the patient characteristics and surgeon experience, without compromising the risk of recurrence or post-operative complications. Mortality and morbidity rates were in keeping with previous studies, which is lower than historically documented, with respiratory complications most prevalent. This study shows that emergency repair of hiatus hernias is a safe operation which is often a lifesaving procedure in elderly comorbid patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10359210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103592102023-07-22 Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience Alasmar, Mohamed McKechnie, Iona Chaparala, Ramakrishna P. C. Updates Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for a hiatus hernia is usually a high-risk procedure in acutely unwell patients. Common surgical techniques include reduction of the hernia, cruropexy then either fundoplication or gastropexy with a gastrostomy. This is an observational study in a tertiary referral centre for complicated hiatus hernias to compare recurrence rates between these two techniques. METHODS: Eighty patients are included in this study, from October 2012 to November 2020. This is a retrospective review and analysis of their management and follow-up. Recurrence of the hiatus hernia that mandates surgical repair was the primary outcome of this study. Secondary outcomes include morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: In total, 38% of the patients included in the study had fundoplication procedures, 53% had gastropexy, 6% had complete or partial resection of the stomach, 3% had fundoplication and gastropexy and one patient had neither (n = 30, 42, 5, 2,1, respectively). Eight patients had symptomatic recurrence of the hernia which required surgical repair. Three of these patients had acute recurrence and 5 after discharge. 50% had undergone fundoplication, 38% underwent gastropexy and 13% underwent a resection (n = 4, 3, 1) (p value = 0.5). 38% of patient had no complications and 30-day mortality was 7.5% CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest single centre review of outcomes following emergency hiatus hernia repairs. Our results show that either fundoplication or gastropexy can be used safely to reduce the risk of recurrence in the emergency setting. Therefore, surgical technique can be tailored based on the patient characteristics and surgeon experience, without compromising the risk of recurrence or post-operative complications. Mortality and morbidity rates were in keeping with previous studies, which is lower than historically documented, with respiratory complications most prevalent. This study shows that emergency repair of hiatus hernias is a safe operation which is often a lifesaving procedure in elderly comorbid patients. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10359210/ /pubmed/36869223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01482-y Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Alasmar, Mohamed
McKechnie, Iona
Chaparala, Ramakrishna P. C.
Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience
title Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience
title_full Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience
title_fullStr Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience
title_full_unstemmed Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience
title_short Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience
title_sort emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? a single-centre experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01482-y
work_keys_str_mv AT alasmarmohamed emergencysurgeryforhiatusherniasdoestechniqueaffectoutcomesasinglecentreexperience
AT mckechnieiona emergencysurgeryforhiatusherniasdoestechniqueaffectoutcomesasinglecentreexperience
AT chaparalaramakrishnapc emergencysurgeryforhiatusherniasdoestechniqueaffectoutcomesasinglecentreexperience