Cargando…

Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation

Biofilm formation is a leading cause for chronic implant-related bone infections as biofilms shield bacteria against the immune system and antibiotics. Additionally, biofilms generate a metabolic microenvironment that shifts the immune response towards tolerance. Here, we compared the impact of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seebach, Elisabeth, Elschner, Tabea, Kraus, Franziska V., Souto-Carneiro, Margarida, Kubatzky, Katharina F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10753-023-01824-3
_version_ 1785075833589727232
author Seebach, Elisabeth
Elschner, Tabea
Kraus, Franziska V.
Souto-Carneiro, Margarida
Kubatzky, Katharina F.
author_facet Seebach, Elisabeth
Elschner, Tabea
Kraus, Franziska V.
Souto-Carneiro, Margarida
Kubatzky, Katharina F.
author_sort Seebach, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description Biofilm formation is a leading cause for chronic implant-related bone infections as biofilms shield bacteria against the immune system and antibiotics. Additionally, biofilms generate a metabolic microenvironment that shifts the immune response towards tolerance. Here, we compared the impact of the metabolite profile of bacterial environments on macrophage immune activation using Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and epidermidis (SE) conditioned media (CM) of planktonic and biofilm cultures. The biofilm environment had reduced glucose and increased lactate concentrations. Moreover, the expression of typical immune activation markers on macrophages was reduced in the biofilm environment compared to the respective planktonic CM. However, all CM caused a predominantly pro-inflammatory macrophage cytokine response with a comparable induction of Tnfa expression. In biofilm CM, this was accompanied by higher levels of anti-inflammatory Il10. Planktonic CM, on the other hand, induced an IRF7 mediated Ifnb gene expression which was absent in the biofilm environments. For SA but not for SE planktonic CM, this was accompanied by IRF3 activation. Stimulation of macrophages with TLR-2/-9 ligands under varying metabolic conditions revealed that, like in the biofilm setting, low glucose concentration reduced the Tnfa to Il10 mRNA ratio. However, the addition of extracellular L-lactate but not D-lactate increased the Tnfa to Il10 mRNA ratio upon TLR-2/-9 stimulation. In summary, our data indicate that the mechanisms behind the activation of macrophages differ between planktonic and biofilm environments. These differences are independent of the metabolite profiles, suggesting that the production of different bacterial factors is ultimately more important than the concentrations of glucose and lactate in the environment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10753-023-01824-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10359233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103592332023-07-22 Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation Seebach, Elisabeth Elschner, Tabea Kraus, Franziska V. Souto-Carneiro, Margarida Kubatzky, Katharina F. Inflammation Research Biofilm formation is a leading cause for chronic implant-related bone infections as biofilms shield bacteria against the immune system and antibiotics. Additionally, biofilms generate a metabolic microenvironment that shifts the immune response towards tolerance. Here, we compared the impact of the metabolite profile of bacterial environments on macrophage immune activation using Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and epidermidis (SE) conditioned media (CM) of planktonic and biofilm cultures. The biofilm environment had reduced glucose and increased lactate concentrations. Moreover, the expression of typical immune activation markers on macrophages was reduced in the biofilm environment compared to the respective planktonic CM. However, all CM caused a predominantly pro-inflammatory macrophage cytokine response with a comparable induction of Tnfa expression. In biofilm CM, this was accompanied by higher levels of anti-inflammatory Il10. Planktonic CM, on the other hand, induced an IRF7 mediated Ifnb gene expression which was absent in the biofilm environments. For SA but not for SE planktonic CM, this was accompanied by IRF3 activation. Stimulation of macrophages with TLR-2/-9 ligands under varying metabolic conditions revealed that, like in the biofilm setting, low glucose concentration reduced the Tnfa to Il10 mRNA ratio. However, the addition of extracellular L-lactate but not D-lactate increased the Tnfa to Il10 mRNA ratio upon TLR-2/-9 stimulation. In summary, our data indicate that the mechanisms behind the activation of macrophages differ between planktonic and biofilm environments. These differences are independent of the metabolite profiles, suggesting that the production of different bacterial factors is ultimately more important than the concentrations of glucose and lactate in the environment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10753-023-01824-3. Springer US 2023-05-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10359233/ /pubmed/37212952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10753-023-01824-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Seebach, Elisabeth
Elschner, Tabea
Kraus, Franziska V.
Souto-Carneiro, Margarida
Kubatzky, Katharina F.
Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation
title Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation
title_full Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation
title_fullStr Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation
title_short Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation
title_sort bacterial and metabolic factors of staphylococcal planktonic and biofilm environments differentially regulate macrophage immune activation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10753-023-01824-3
work_keys_str_mv AT seebachelisabeth bacterialandmetabolicfactorsofstaphylococcalplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyregulatemacrophageimmuneactivation
AT elschnertabea bacterialandmetabolicfactorsofstaphylococcalplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyregulatemacrophageimmuneactivation
AT krausfranziskav bacterialandmetabolicfactorsofstaphylococcalplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyregulatemacrophageimmuneactivation
AT soutocarneiromargarida bacterialandmetabolicfactorsofstaphylococcalplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyregulatemacrophageimmuneactivation
AT kubatzkykatharinaf bacterialandmetabolicfactorsofstaphylococcalplanktonicandbiofilmenvironmentsdifferentiallyregulatemacrophageimmuneactivation