Cargando…

Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps

Video calling is one of the most energy-intensive features in apps requiring the simultaneous operation of the mobile camera, display screen, audio speaker, and internet services. This feature impacts a smartphone battery's runtime and lifetime. This paper is the first of its kind experimental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Hayder, Khan, Hassan Abbas, Pecht, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38859-3
_version_ 1785075842830827520
author Ali, Hayder
Khan, Hassan Abbas
Pecht, Michael
author_facet Ali, Hayder
Khan, Hassan Abbas
Pecht, Michael
author_sort Ali, Hayder
collection PubMed
description Video calling is one of the most energy-intensive features in apps requiring the simultaneous operation of the mobile camera, display screen, audio speaker, and internet services. This feature impacts a smartphone battery's runtime and lifetime. This paper is the first of its kind experimental study, which quantifies the operating profile (discharge current, temperature, and terminal voltage) of video call feature in multiple widely used social media apps, which include WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Zoom, Skype, WeChat, Google Hangouts, Imo and Viber. One smartphone each of Vivo and Motorola has been evaluated as the manufacturer-provided application programming interface (API) allowed real-time measurement of the operating profile. Results indicate that the video calling feature for Facebook Messenger and Imo is the most energy efficient. In contrast, Google Hangouts is up to 35% more energy-intensive for video calling than other apps. Measurements also show that Vivo's in-service battery temperature is lower than Motorola due to its efficient chipset. For instance, during active Google Hangouts operation for 1 h, Vivo temperature is limited to 46 °C, whereas Motorola temperature rises to 52 °C. Finally, the influence of app algorithms and codecs on energy efficiency is also discussed with regard to operating performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10359271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103592712023-07-22 Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps Ali, Hayder Khan, Hassan Abbas Pecht, Michael Sci Rep Article Video calling is one of the most energy-intensive features in apps requiring the simultaneous operation of the mobile camera, display screen, audio speaker, and internet services. This feature impacts a smartphone battery's runtime and lifetime. This paper is the first of its kind experimental study, which quantifies the operating profile (discharge current, temperature, and terminal voltage) of video call feature in multiple widely used social media apps, which include WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Zoom, Skype, WeChat, Google Hangouts, Imo and Viber. One smartphone each of Vivo and Motorola has been evaluated as the manufacturer-provided application programming interface (API) allowed real-time measurement of the operating profile. Results indicate that the video calling feature for Facebook Messenger and Imo is the most energy efficient. In contrast, Google Hangouts is up to 35% more energy-intensive for video calling than other apps. Measurements also show that Vivo's in-service battery temperature is lower than Motorola due to its efficient chipset. For instance, during active Google Hangouts operation for 1 h, Vivo temperature is limited to 46 °C, whereas Motorola temperature rises to 52 °C. Finally, the influence of app algorithms and codecs on energy efficiency is also discussed with regard to operating performance. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10359271/ /pubmed/37474603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38859-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ali, Hayder
Khan, Hassan Abbas
Pecht, Michael
Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps
title Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps
title_full Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps
title_fullStr Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps
title_short Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps
title_sort evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37474603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38859-3
work_keys_str_mv AT alihayder evaluationofinservicesmartphonebatterydrainageprofileforvideocallingfeatureinmajorapps
AT khanhassanabbas evaluationofinservicesmartphonebatterydrainageprofileforvideocallingfeatureinmajorapps
AT pechtmichael evaluationofinservicesmartphonebatterydrainageprofileforvideocallingfeatureinmajorapps