Cargando…

Effect of a new graphically modified Nutri-Score on the objective understanding of foods’ nutrient profile and ultraprocessing: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: When considering health-related impacts of foods, nutrient profile and (ultra)processing are two complementary dimensions. The Nutri-Score informs on the nutrient profile dimension. Recently, mounting evidence linked ultraprocessed food consumption to various adverse health outcomes, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srour, Bernard, Hercberg, Serge, Galan, Pilar, Monteiro, Carlos Augusto, Szabo de Edelenyi, Fabien, Bourhis, Laurent, Fialon, Morgane, Sarda, Barthélémy, Druesne-Pecollo, Nathalie, Esseddik, Younes, Deschasaux-Tanguy, Mélanie, Julia, Chantal, Touvier, Mathilde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37484539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000599
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: When considering health-related impacts of foods, nutrient profile and (ultra)processing are two complementary dimensions. The Nutri-Score informs on the nutrient profile dimension. Recently, mounting evidence linked ultraprocessed food consumption to various adverse health outcomes, independently of their nutrient profile. To inform consumers about each of these health-related dimensions of food, we tested, in a randomised controlled trial, if a graphically modified version ‘Nutri-Score V.2.0’, including a black ‘ultraprocessed’ banner, would improve the capacity of consumers to rank products according to their nutrient profile and to detect those ultra-processed, compared with a no-label situation. METHODS: 21 159 participants included in the NutriNet-Santé web-cohort were randomly assigned to a control arm (no front-of-pack label) or an experimental arm (Nutri-Score 2.0) and were presented an online questionnaire with three sets of food products (cookies, breakfast cereals and ready-to-eat meals) to rank according to nutrient profile and to identify ultraprocessed foods. The primary outcome was objective understanding of nutrient profile and ultraprocessing, represented by a score of correct answers. Secondary outcomes were purchasing intentions and the healthiest-perceived product. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS: The Nutri-Score V.2.0 increased the objective understanding of both the nutrient profile dimension (OR (highest vs lowest score category)=29.0 (23.4–35.9), p<0.001) and the ultraprocessing dimension (OR=174.3 (151.4–200.5), p<0.001). Trends were similar for cookies, breakfast cereals and ready-to-eat meals. The Nutri-Score V.2.0 had a positive effect on purchasing intentions and on the products perceived as the healthiest. CONCLUSION: This randomised controlled trial demonstrates the interest of a front-of-pack label combining the Nutri-Score (informing on the nutrient profile dimension) with an additional graphic mention, indicating when the food is ultraprocessed, compared with a no-label situation. Our results show that a combined label enabled participants to independently understand these two complementary dimensions of foods. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05610930.